RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

dobjs/dob

Light and fast 🚀 state management tool using proxy.

  • View repository ↗
  • TypeScript
  • ★ 726
  • commit 1022933a04a4
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

77/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

73/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2017-021,161 · 0% AI
  2. 2017-03628 · 0% AI
  3. 2017-044 · 0% AI
  4. 2017-05442 · 0% AI
  5. 2017-062,443 · 0% AI
  6. 2017-0760 · 0% AI
  7. 2017-08617 · 0% AI
  8. 2017-09403 · 0% AI
  9. 2017-10713 · 0% AI
  10. 2017-11743 · 0% AI
  11. 2017-1271 · 0% AI
  12. 2018-024 · 0% AI
  13. 2018-0511 · 0% AI
  14. 2018-06170 · 0% AI
  15. 2018-090 · 0% AI
  16. 2018-10233 · 0% AI
  17. 2018-121,277 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
221
effective_loc
8,980
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
316.75
measured_loc
8,980
median_loc_per_hour
62.73
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
8,980
work_units
88
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
1,397
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

77 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.17, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication66
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI90
  • Documentation65
  • Type safety60
  • Review process0

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
743
functions
99
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
1.95
p90_ccn
4
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items
compared_lines
804
duplicated_lines
56
duplicated_share
7.0%
files
14
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
1,397
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok2 items
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
  • CI runs tests (npm test)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
yes
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
105
cochange_share
35.2%
source_lines
1,397
test_lines
1,632
test_ratio
1.17
Documentationok2 items
  • readme.md readme.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
138
Type safetyok1 item
  • TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json tsconfig.json
check:low_escape_density
no
check:strict_config
yes
escapes
75
escapes_per_kloc
53.69

Security

73 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecard25

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
aggregate
2
check:Binary-Artifacts
yes
check:Branch-Protection
no
check:CII-Best-Practices
no
check:Code-Review
no
check:Fuzzing
no
check:License
yes
check:Maintained
no
check:SAST
no
check:Security-Policy
no
Package registriesok
checked
5
declared
5
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
1,397
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
  • package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) package.json
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
no
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
1
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

No line-level findings.

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityokscorecard v5.6.00
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-141022933a04a4prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7773
2026-11-141022933a04a4prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%7773

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/dobjs/dob/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/dobjs/dob/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/dobjs/dob/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/dobjs/dob/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/dobjs/dob/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/dobjs/dob/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/dobjs/dob
  • Commit: 1022933a04a4ac10da0318ff48b590acca4b9344
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:04+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 77 adequate 90% 100%
Security 73 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2017-06 2,443 0%
2017-07 60 0%
2017-08 617 0%
2017-09 403 0%
2017-10 713 0%
2017-11 743 0%
2017-12 71 0%
2018-02 4 0%
2018-05 11 0%
2018-06 170 0%
2018-10 233 0%
2018-12 1,277 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.17, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 7% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 66
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 90
Documentation 65
Type safety 60
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) 0
  • Functions: 99; mean complexity 1.9, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 7.0% of 804 compared
  • Tests: 1,632 test lines for 1,397 source lines (ratio 1.17); CI test commands: npm test; 35% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 25
  • Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
  • OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.0/10 (published 2026-11-09)

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 1,397; test lines: 1,632
Language Lines
TypeScript 3,029