RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

dddqmmx/xminecraft

  • View repository ↗
  • Rust
  • ★ 0
  • commit 2d7bc8563845
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

11%

explicit

Confidence
75%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

62/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

62/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

11% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 11% of first-party code added; an estimated 11% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share11%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts54%
  • Estimated AI-generated share11%
  • AI tool configuration files2
  • Work sessions at AI pace3
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.07

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code22,3112026-07-262026-08-01

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-064,689 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-0710,157 · 10% AI
  3. 2026-086,605 · 20% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 1,392 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 13,400 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality3.591.492.41×
Security0.000.450.00×

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok3 items
attributed_commit_share
10.0%
attributed_commits
2
attributed_loc
2,311
attributed_loc_share
10.8%
commits
20
effective_loc
21,451
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok2 items
artifacts
2
earliest_adoption
2026-06-17
tools_configured
2
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok3 items
excluded_import_loc
3,613
flagged_loc
11,586
flagged_loc_share
65.0%
flagged_units
3
max_loc_per_hour
1,325.75
measured_loc
17,838
median_loc_per_hour
413.38
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
11
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok1 item
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
1
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
1
files:placeholder
0
index
0.07
lines_scanned
14,792
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.07
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
1,392
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
51
other_lines
13,400
quality:ai_findings
5
quality:ai_per_kloc
3.59
quality:other_findings
20
quality:other_per_kloc
1.49
quality:ratio
2.41
security:ai_findings
0
security:ai_per_kloc
0
security:other_findings
6
security:other_per_kloc
0.45
security:ratio
0

Code quality

62 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.24, CI runs tests; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

How the score is built

  • Complexity58
  • Duplication61
  • Lint and smells47
  • Tests and CI87
  • Documentation40
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
13
function_nloc
9,590
functions
602
long_functions
8
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
3
p90_ccn
7
risky_nloc_share
18.1%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
10,872
duplicated_lines
903
duplicated_share
8.3%
files
51
Lintok
category:best-practice
22
category:maintainability
3
findings
25
scanned_lines
14,792
weighted_findings
45
Tests and CIok3 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • CI runs tests (go test, cargo test)
  • CI runs linters (clippy, rustfmt, cargo fmt)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
yes
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
17
cochange_share
70.6%
source_lines
14,792
test_lines
3,521
test_ratio
0.24
Documentationok1 item
  • README.md README.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
no
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
421
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

62 weak

Security posture is weak: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 0 only in history; 10 known vulnerabilities in 7 dependencies; 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets60
  • Static analysis (SAST)97
  • Vulnerable dependencies70
  • CI workflows52
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
27
declared
27
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
1
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
3
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
5
findings_high
0
findings_low
5
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
14,792
weighted_findings
1.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
21
vulnerabilities
10
vulnerable_packages
7
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
0
vulns_low
2
vulns_medium
3
vulns_unknown
5
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
5
findings_high
3
findings_low
0
findings_medium
2
penalty
39.60
workflows
1
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

14 high25 medium10 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/enc.py:386 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/enc.py:572 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/enc.py:592 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/enc.py:610 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/play_prelogin.py:112 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/probe.py:166 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/probe.py:211 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/probe.py:367 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/probe.py:453 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep probe/probe.py:589 time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? Lint
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:16 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:19 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:24 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high gitleaks/private-key src/test_support.rs:75 Possible private-key secret in the current tree Secrets (gitleaks)
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:12 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:15 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:18 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:21 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:25 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:3 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:6 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding fix_lints.py:9 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding probe/diff.py:20 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding probe/diff.py:21 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses probe/enc.py:252 Is "is_probe" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant fn.is_probe() because fn.is_probe is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses probe/enc.py:273 Is "is_probe" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant wrapped.is_probe() because wrapped.is_probe is always true. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.hardcoded-tmp-path probe/mc_codec.py:13 Detected hardcoded temp directory. Consider using 'tempfile.TemporaryFile' instead. Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding probe/mc_codec.py:13 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses probe/probe.py:156 Is "is_probe" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant fn.is_probe() because fn.is_probe is always true. Lint
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:13 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:16 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium osv/GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0285, GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2023-0071 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2023-0071 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0384 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0384 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0134 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0134 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0348, GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0349, GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir src/cert.rs:169 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir src/cli.rs:835 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir src/config.rs:632 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir src/test_support.rs:33 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir src/whitelist.rs:179 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low gitleaks/private-key tests/fixtures/ca.key:1 Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) Secrets (gitleaks)
low gitleaks/private-key tests/fixtures/server.key:1 Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) Secrets (gitleaks)
low gitleaks/private-key tests/fixtures/test.key:1 Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41425
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.05
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.110
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4145
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.14

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-142d7bc8563845prov-5+qual-2+sec-211%6262
2026-11-142d7bc8563845prov-4+qual-2+sec-211%6262

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/dddqmmx/xminecraft
  • Commit: 2d7bc856384565e6835ed6d35467eafb3084d3a0
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:03+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 11 explicit 75% 100%
Code quality 62 weak 90% 100%
Security 62 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 11% of first-party code added; an estimated 11% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 10.8%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 54.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 10.8%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 2 2,311
  • AI tooling configured in repo: gemini, generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 1,392 of 14,792.

Findings per 1,000 lines AI-attributed Other Ratio
Quality 3.592 1.493 2.41x
Security 0.0 0.448 0.0x
  • Stylometry index: 0.07 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 1, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-06 4,689 0%
2026-07 10,157 10%
2026-08 6,605 20%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (cc7c01abf3fe)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (62134a3f101c)
  • AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
  • GEMINI.md (gemini configuration) (GEMINI.md)
  • 5,303 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (1,326 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (71185aa9ba88)
  • 3,388 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (847 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (a2e1ff17e48e)
  • 2,895 lines of first-party code in ~4.1h (709 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (1c8cce08f0d5)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // first, so a 17-ASCII-char name reports (17 > 16) and a 100-byte (src/protocol)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.24, CI runs tests; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 58
Duplication 61
Code smells (Opengrep) 47
Tests and CI 87
Documentation 40
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 602; mean complexity 3.0, 90th percentile 7; 13 complex and 8 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 8.3% of 10,872 compared
  • Tests: 3,521 test lines for 14,792 source lines (ratio 0.24); CI test commands: go test, cargo test; 71% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 1 possible secret(s) in the tree, 0 only in history; 10 known vulnerabilities in 7 dependencies; 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 60
Static analysis (Opengrep) 97
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 70
CI workflows (zizmor) 52
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 10 in 7 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 3, low 2)

  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high gitleaks/private-key: Possible private-key secret in the current tree src/test_support.rs:75
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:16
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:19
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:24
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0190: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0384: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0384 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2023-0071: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2023-0071 Cargo.lock
medium osv/GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0285, GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc Cargo.lock
medium osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2025-0134: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2025-0134 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Cargo.lock
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:16
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/ci.yml:13
low gitleaks/private-key: Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) tests/fixtures/ca.key:1
low gitleaks/private-key: Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) tests/fixtures/server.key:1
low gitleaks/private-key: Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) tests/fixtures/test.key:1
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir: temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary directory must use a secure method to create a uniquely named file. [confidence high] src/cert.rs:169
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir: temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary directory must use a secure method to create a uniquely named file. [confidence high] src/cli.rs:835
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir: temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary directory must use a secure method to create a uniquely named file. [confidence high] src/config.rs:632
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir: temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary directory must use a secure method to create a uniquely named file. [confidence high] src/test_support.rs:33
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir: temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary directory must use a secure method to create a uniquely named file. [confidence high] src/whitelist.rs:179
low osv/GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0348, GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv Cargo.lock
low osv/GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0349, GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 Cargo.lock

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 14,792; test lines: 3,521
Language Lines
Rust 16,186
Python 2,127