Leaderboard github.com
craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool
Offline Guitar Pro tab player and practice tool with Neural Amp Modeler guitar tone, written in Rust
unreviewed-ai-risk
AI provenance
100%
explicit
- Confidence
- 73%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
60/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
66/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
100% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share100%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share100%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace2
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.74
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot coding agent | 10 | 13,395 | 2026-10-10 | 2026-10-29 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-1013,395 · 100% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 12,105 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 0.00 | — | — |
| Security | 0.17 | — | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok11 items
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: 10 attributed commits, 13,395 lines added
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot'
- attributed_commit_share
- 90.9%
- attributed_commits
- 10
- attributed_loc
- 13,395
- attributed_loc_share
- 100.0%
- commits
- 11
- effective_loc
- 13,395
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok2 items
- 3,227 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (807 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 2,748 lines of first-party code in ~4.5h (613 lines/hour, 2 commit session)
- excluded_import_loc
- 5,215
- flagged_loc
- 5,975
- flagged_loc_share
- 73.0%
- flagged_units
- 2
- max_loc_per_hour
- 806.75
- measured_loc
- 8,180
- median_loc_per_hour
- 419.65
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 5
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok5 items
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1: structure. Match the whole song at once by what each part is doing - which parts
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 2: hits. Place the tab's hits where the structure says they fall, and slide each
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 3: the map playback follows. Every point is measured, so there is no single tempo for
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 4: report each window as a check on the structure match.
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 5: with the map settled, ask the blunt question - do the hits land together? A
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 8
- count:narrated_steps
- 5
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 3
- files:narrated_steps
- 1
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.74
- lines_scanned
- 12,105
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0.66
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0.41
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 12,105
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 21
- other_lines
- 0
- quality:ai_findings
- 0
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- quality:other_findings
- 0
- security:ai_findings
- 2
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0.17
- security:other_findings
- 0
Code quality
60 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 43% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.
How the score is built
- Complexity27
- Duplication99
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI35
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- parse in src/gp.rs: complexity 61, 102 lines
- read_note_effects in src/gp.rs: complexity 58, 117 lines
- schedule_beat in src/timeline.rs: complexity 54, 243 lines
- process_block in src/synth/mod.rs: complexity 53, 187 lines
- align in src/backing.rs: complexity 47, 234 lines
- read_track in src/gp.rs: complexity 41, 60 lines
- handle in src/synth/mod.rs: complexity 41, 111 lines
- parse_layer_array in src/synth/nam.rs: complexity 38, 104 lines
- read_measure_header in src/gp.rs: complexity 37, 77 lines
- tab_view in src/ui/mod.rs: complexity 34, 109 lines
- complex_functions
- 47
- function_nloc
- 9,240
- functions
- 432
- long_functions
- 16
- many_param_functions
- 3
- mean_ccn
- 5.91
- p90_ccn
- 16
- risky_nloc_share
- 43.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 9,111
- duplicated_lines
- 12
- duplicated_share
- 0.1%
- files
- 21
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 12,105
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok3 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml
.github/workflows/ci.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml
.github/workflows/release.yml - CI runs tests (go test, cargo test)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 2
- cochange_commits
- 9
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 12,105
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 29
Type safetyskipped
Security
66 weak
Security posture is weak: 12 known vulnerabilities in 9 dependencies; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)99
- Vulnerable dependencies64
- CI workflows10
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 16
- declared
- 16
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 2
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 2
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 12,105
- weighted_findings
- 0.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 27
- vulnerabilities
- 12
- vulnerable_packages
- 9
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 3
- vulns_medium
- 1
- vulns_unknown
- 8
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 16
- findings_high
- 12
- findings_low
- 1
- findings_medium
- 3
- penalty
- 140.40
- workflows
- 2
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok5 items
- release v0.1.0 ships guitar-practice-tool_0.1.0_amd64.deb (0 downloads)
- release v0.1.0 ships guitar-practice-tool_0.1.0_x64-setup.exe (1 downloads)
- release v0.1.0 ships guitar-practice-tool_0.1.0_x86_64.AppImage (0 downloads)
- release v0.1.0 ships Guitar.Practice.Tool_0.1.0_aarch64.dmg (1 downloads)
- release v0.1.0 ships Guitar.Practice.Tool_0.1.0_x64.dmg (0 downloads)
- binary_assets
- 5
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
12 high12 medium5 low1 info
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:16 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:17 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:18 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:33 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:34 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/release.yml:37 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:37 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:43 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:49 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:64 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/release.yml:68 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/release.yml:9 | overly broad permissions [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:16 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:9 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/release.yml:33 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0370 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0370 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0371 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0371 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0372 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0372 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0381 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0381 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0348, GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-vp88-798v-h67f |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0347, GHSA-vp88-798v-h67f | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 |
Cargo.lock | [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0349, GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.args |
src/main.rs:220 | args should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be relied... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe |
src/synth/sampler.rs:593 | current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| info | zizmor/superfluous-actions |
.github/workflows/release.yml:68 | action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 16 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 12 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 2 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 269dc8199607 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 60 | 66 |
| 2026-11-14 | 269dc8199607 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 60 | 66 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool
- Commit:
269dc8199607d3a0fac4b757b2367eb0cef419e7 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:03+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 100 | explicit | 73% | 100% |
| Code quality | 60 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 66 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot coding agent | 10 | 13,395 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 12,105 of 12,105.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
- Stylometry index: 0.74 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 5, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 8). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 13,395 | 100% |
Evidence
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (269dc8199607)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (6f220c2133f5)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (34925619d8d7)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (a2839208cd0c)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (296385520bf8)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (0d78a68edaa2)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (9a48ab09a612)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (2b5a37a1e83c)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (8624017078b1)
- GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (860cfeb828ff)
- 3,227 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (807 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (34925619d8d7)
- 2,748 lines of first-party code in ~4.5h (613 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (2b5a37a1e83c)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1: structure. Match the whole song at once by what each part is doing - which parts (src/backing.)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 2: hits. Place the tab's hits where the structure says they fall, and slide each (src/backing.)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Step 3: the map playback follows. Every point is measured, so there is no single tempo for (src/backing.)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 43% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 27 |
| Duplication | 99 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 35 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 432; mean complexity 5.9, 90th percentile 16; 47 complex and 16 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.1% of 9,111 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 12,105 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: go test, cargo test; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- parse in src/gp.rs: complexity 61, 102 lines
- read_note_effects in src/gp.rs: complexity 58, 117 lines
- schedule_beat in src/timeline.rs: complexity 54, 243 lines
- process_block in src/synth/mod.rs: complexity 53, 187 lines
- align in src/backing.rs: complexity 47, 234 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 12 known vulnerabilities in 9 dependencies; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 99 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 64 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 10 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 12 in 9 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 1, low 3)
-
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:16 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:17 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:18 |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:9 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:33 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:34 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:37 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:43 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:49 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:64 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:68 |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:37 |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0381: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0381 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0371: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0371 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0370: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0370 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0372: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0372 |
Cargo.lock |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:16 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/ci.yml:9 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/release.yml:33 |
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.args: args should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be relied upon for security purposes." [confidence high] |
src/main.rs:220 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v0.1.0 ships guitar-practice-tool_0.1.0_amd64.deb (0 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.1.0 ships guitar-practice-tool_0.1.0_x64-setup.exe (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.1.0 ships guitar-practice-tool_0.1.0_x86_64.AppImage (0 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.1.0 ships Guitar.Practice.Tool_0.1.0_aarch64.dmg (1 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.1.0 ships Guitar.Practice.Tool_0.1.0_x64.dmg (0 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 12,105; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Rust | 12,105 |