RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool

Offline Guitar Pro tab player and practice tool with Neural Amp Modeler guitar tone, written in Rust

  • View repository ↗
  • Rust
  • ★ 1
  • commit 269dc8199607
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence
73%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

60/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

66/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share100%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share100%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace2
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.74

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
GitHub Copilot coding agent1013,3952026-10-102026-10-29

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-1013,395 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 12,105 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.00——
Security0.17——

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok11 items
attributed_commit_share
90.9%
attributed_commits
10
attributed_loc
13,395
attributed_loc_share
100.0%
commits
11
effective_loc
13,395
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok2 items
excluded_import_loc
5,215
flagged_loc
5,975
flagged_loc_share
73.0%
flagged_units
2
max_loc_per_hour
806.75
measured_loc
8,180
median_loc_per_hour
419.65
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
5
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok5 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
8
count:narrated_steps
5
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
3
files:narrated_steps
1
files:placeholder
0
index
0.74
lines_scanned
12,105
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0.66
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.41
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
12,105
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
21
other_lines
0
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:ai_per_kloc
0
quality:other_findings
0
security:ai_findings
2
security:ai_per_kloc
0.17
security:other_findings
0

Code quality

60 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 43% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

  • Complexity27
  • Duplication99
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI35
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
47
function_nloc
9,240
functions
432
long_functions
16
many_param_functions
3
mean_ccn
5.91
p90_ccn
16
risky_nloc_share
43.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
compared_lines
9,111
duplicated_lines
12
duplicated_share
0.1%
files
21
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
12,105
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok3 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
  • CI runs tests (go test, cargo test)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
2
cochange_commits
9
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
12,105
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok1 item
  • README.md README.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
29
Type safetyskipped

Security

66 weak

Security posture is weak: 12 known vulnerabilities in 9 dependencies; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)99
  • Vulnerable dependencies64
  • CI workflows10
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
16
declared
16
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
2
findings_high
0
findings_low
2
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
1
scanned_lines
12,105
weighted_findings
0.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
27
vulnerabilities
12
vulnerable_packages
9
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
0
vulns_low
3
vulns_medium
1
vulns_unknown
8
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
16
findings_high
12
findings_low
1
findings_medium
3
penalty
140.40
workflows
2
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
5
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

12 high12 medium5 low1 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:16 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:17 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:18 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:33 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:34 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/release.yml:37 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:37 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:43 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:49 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:64 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:68 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/release.yml:9 overly broad permissions [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:16 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:9 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/release.yml:33 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0370 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0370 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0371 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0371 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0372 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0372 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0381 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0381 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0348, GHSA-h2v8-394m-p7vv Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-vp88-798v-h67f Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0347, GHSA-vp88-798v-h67f Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low osv/GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0349, GHSA-w44r-93j7-qv28 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.args src/main.rs:220 args should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be relied... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe src/synth/sampler.rs:593 current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change... Static analysis (opengrep)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/release.yml:68 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.016
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.112
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4142
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14269dc8199607prov-5+qual-2+sec-2100%6066
2026-11-14269dc8199607prov-4+qual-2+sec-2100%6066

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/craigloewen-msft/guitar-practice-tool/)
Full text report

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 100 explicit 73% 100%
Code quality 60 weak 90% 100%
Security 66 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
GitHub Copilot coding agent 10 13,395

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 12,105 of 12,105.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 0.74 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 5, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 8). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-10 13,395 100%

Evidence

  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (269dc8199607)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (6f220c2133f5)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (34925619d8d7)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (a2839208cd0c)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (296385520bf8)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (0d78a68edaa2)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (9a48ab09a612)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (2b5a37a1e83c)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (8624017078b1)
  • GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (860cfeb828ff)
  • 3,227 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (807 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (34925619d8d7)
  • 2,748 lines of first-party code in ~4.5h (613 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (2b5a37a1e83c)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1: structure. Match the whole song at once by what each part is doing - which parts (src/backing.)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Step 2: hits. Place the tab's hits where the structure says they fall, and slide each (src/backing.)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Step 3: the map playback follows. Every point is measured, so there is no single tempo for (src/backing.)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 43% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 27
Duplication 99
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 35
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 432; mean complexity 5.9, 90th percentile 16; 47 complex and 16 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.1% of 9,111 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 12,105 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: go test, cargo test; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 12 known vulnerabilities in 9 dependencies; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 99
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 64
CI workflows (zizmor) 10
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 12 in 9 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 1, low 3)

  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:16
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:17
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:18
high zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:9
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:33
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:34
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:37
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:43
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:49
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:64
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:68
high zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:37
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Cargo.lock
medium osv/GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0346, GHSA-c8m5-c952-6cm4 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0382: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0382 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0386: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0386 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0192: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0192 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0381: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0381 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0371: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0371 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0370: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0370 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0372: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0372 Cargo.lock
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:16
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/ci.yml:9
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/release.yml:33
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.args: args should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be relied upon for security purposes." [confidence high] src/main.rs:220

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 12,105; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Rust 12,105