RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

byoutline/kickmaterial

Crowdfunding app concept for Android. Created to showcase new trends in Android development with strong focus on Material Design.

  • View repository ↗
  • Kotlin
  • ★ 1,611
  • commit 25181c9ce4fd
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

81/100

strong

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

80/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2015-106,107 · 0% AI
  2. 2015-1144 · 0% AI
  3. 2015-122 · 0% AI
  4. 2016-01155 · 0% AI
  5. 2016-020 · 0% AI
  6. 2016-03322 · 0% AI
  7. 2016-0541 · 0% AI
  8. 2016-10111 · 0% AI
  9. 2016-110 · 0% AI
  10. 2017-086,086 · 0% AI
  11. 2017-0929 · 0% AI
  12. 2017-10397 · 0% AI
  13. 2017-111,276 · 0% AI
  14. 2017-121 · 0% AI
  15. 2018-013 · 0% AI
  16. 2018-1042 · 0% AI
  17. 2018-110 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
171
effective_loc
14,616
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
10,749
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
123.78
measured_loc
3,867
median_loc_per_hour
51.50
pr_timed_units
2
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
3,867
work_units
50
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
4,209
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

81 strong

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.02, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication92
  • Lint and smells88
  • Tests and CI61
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
1,867
functions
308
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
1
mean_ccn
1.44
p90_ccn
2
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok3 items
compared_lines
2,188
duplicated_lines
31
duplicated_share
1.4%
files
72
Lintok
category:best-practice
1
category:correctness
5
findings
6
scanned_lines
4,209
weighted_findings
2.25
Tests and CIok2 items
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
  • CI runs tests (./gradlew check, unittest)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
71
cochange_share
12.7%
source_lines
4,209
test_lines
69
test_ratio
0.02
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
45
Type safetyskipped

Security

80 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)95
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
1
parse_errors
1
scanned_lines
4,209
weighted_findings
0.60
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.6%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

2 medium5 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/bash.lang.best-practice.useless-cat ci/update_android_dependencies.sh:5 Useless call to 'cat' in a pipeline. Use '<' and '>' for any command to read from a file or write to a file. Lint
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:16 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command ci/launchEmu.sh:4 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command ci/update_android_dependencies.sh:17 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command ci/update_android_dependencies.sh:22 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command ci/update_android_dependencies.sh:23 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command ci/update_android_dependencies.sh:5 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4146
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1425181c9ce4fdprov-5+qual-2+sec-20%8180
2026-11-1425181c9ce4fdprov-4+qual-2+sec-20%8180

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/byoutline/kickmaterial/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/byoutline/kickmaterial/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/byoutline/kickmaterial/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/byoutline/kickmaterial/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/byoutline/kickmaterial/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/byoutline/kickmaterial/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 81 strong 90% 100%
Security 80 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2015-12 2 0%
2016-01 155 0%
2016-03 322 0%
2016-05 41 0%
2016-10 111 0%
2017-08 6,086 0%
2017-09 29 0%
2017-10 397 0%
2017-11 1,276 0%
2017-12 1 0%
2018-01 3 0%
2018-10 42 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.02, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 92
Code smells (Opengrep) 88
Tests and CI 61
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 308; mean complexity 1.4, 90th percentile 2; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 1.4% of 2,188 compared
  • Tests: 69 test lines for 4,209 source lines (ratio 0.02); CI test commands: ./gradlew check, unittest; 13% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 95
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:16

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 4,209; test lines: 69
Language Lines
Kotlin 4,095
Java 148
Shell 35