RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop

Malware Defender 2026 desktop setup with real-time protection against malware and ransomware, deep system scan with quarantine and removal, plus web shield that blocks phishing and malicious sites for Windows 11

  • View repository ↗
  • C++
  • ★ 298
  • commit 832edac99624
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

insufficient-sourceunusual-traction

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
44%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

—

Not scored: no supported files or tools failed.

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

—

Not scored: no supported files or tools failed.

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-100 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-1138 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
14
effective_loc
38
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
9.50
measured_loc
38
median_loc_per_hour
0
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
1
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
38
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
17
functions
4
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
2.25
p90_ccn
3
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
22
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
3
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
38
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .github/workflows/SP7LDgUHone.yml .github/workflows/SP7LDgUHone.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
1
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
38
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
148
Type safetyskipped

Security

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
38
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
1
findings_high
1
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
penalty
12
workflows
1
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
14.3%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok3 items
  • 38 lines of source code
  • 298 stars in 1 days (298/day)
  • owner account is 32 days old with 298 stars on this repo
binary_assets
0
signals
3
suspicious
0

Findings

1 high

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/SP7LDgUHone.yml:12 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.01
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14832edac99624prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%——

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/brisk-thrush-husky/malware-defender-desktop/)
Full text report

Scores

Insufficient first-party source code to score quality or security (under 100 lines). An empty or README-only repository is not evidence of safety.

Unusual traction: many stars in a few days on a newly created account, which is consistent with purchased or automated stars. Star count is not a reliable signal for this repository.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 44% 100%
Code quality not scored
Security not scored

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-11 38 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Distribution signals

  • thin-source: 38 lines of source code
  • star-burst: 298 stars in 1 days (298/day)
  • new-owner: owner account is 32 days old with 298 stars on this repo

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 38; test lines: 0
Language Lines
C++ 38