Leaderboard github.com

brackets-userland/brackets-git

brackets-git — git extension for adobe/brackets

View repository ↗
TypeScript
★ 651
commit 334b702d2a35
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

none-detected

Confidence: 65%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

70/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

70/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.18

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2013-083,048 · 0% AI
2013-091,649 · 0% AI
2013-10239 · 0% AI
2013-1169 · 0% AI
2013-12670 · 0% AI
2014-01674 · 0% AI
2014-021,553 · 0% AI
2014-0310,312 · 0% AI
2014-049,840 · 0% AI
2014-05244 · 0% AI
2014-06115 · 0% AI
2014-07491 · 0% AI
2014-08220 · 0% AI
2014-091,039 · 0% AI
2014-10398 · 0% AI
2014-11145 · 0% AI
2014-12472 · 0% AI
2015-011 · 0% AI
2015-02116 · 0% AI
2015-03747 · 0% AI
2015-04139 · 0% AI
2015-0521 · 0% AI
2015-070 · 0% AI
2015-0881 · 0% AI
2015-090 · 0% AI
2015-12113 · 0% AI
2016-01228 · 0% AI
2016-021 · 0% AI
2016-032 · 0% AI
2016-042 · 0% AI
2016-05169 · 0% AI
2016-088 · 0% AI
2016-097,488 · 0% AI
2016-10447 · 0% AI
2016-11833 · 0% AI
2016-12396 · 0% AI
2017-01631 · 0% AI
2017-07242 · 0% AI
2018-011 · 0% AI
2018-040 · 0% AI
2018-080 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 1,319
effective_loc: 42,844
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 2,267
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 932.25
measured_loc: 40,577
median_loc_per_hour: 70.50
pr_timed_units: 1
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 7,906
pre_ai_era_bursts: 3
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 40,577
work_units: 619

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 1.40
releases: 2

Coding styleok2 items

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 2
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 2
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.18
lines_scanned: 10,886
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0.18
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

70 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 4% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity90
Duplication94
Lint and smells99
Tests and CI15
Documentation100
Type safety40
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok4 items

complex_functions: 4
function_nloc: 6,597
functions: 1,014
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 1.80
p90_ccn: 3
risky_nloc_share: 3.6%

Duplication (jscpd)ok5 items

compared_lines: 7,998
duplicated_lines: 84
duplicated_share: 1.1%
files: 58

Lintok

category:best-practice: 2
findings: 2
scanned_lines: 10,886
weighted_findings: 0.50

Tests and CIok1 item

CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 1
cochange_commits: 181
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 10,886
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok4 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE
CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md
CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md

check:changelog: yes
check:contributing: yes
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 82

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 11
escapes_per_kloc: 1.36

Security

70 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 5 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)68
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 29
declared: 29
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 37
findings_high: 5
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 32
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 10,886
weighted_findings: 11.75

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok2 items

package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) package.json
src/node/package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) src/node/package.json

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: no
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 2.0%
unpinned_manifests: 2

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

5 high32 medium2 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`	src/node/cli.ts:40	Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `args`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`	src/node/cli.ts:40	Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `command`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`	src/node/cli.ts:70	Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `command`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`	src/node/process-utils.ts:32	Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `pid`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`	src/node/process-utils.ts:37	Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `pid`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	nls/generate.js:18	Detected that function argument `lang` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	nls/generate.js:58	Detected that function argument `lang` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`	src/Branch.ts:144	JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Branch.ts:336	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-method`	src/ChangelogDialog.ts:19	User controlled data in a jQuery's `.html(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`	src/ChangelogDialog.ts:19	JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method`	src/Cli.ts:168	Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`	src/HistoryViewer.ts:52	JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Panel.ts:1144	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Panel.ts:957	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Panel.ts:961	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Panel.ts:965	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Panel.ts:968	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Panel.ts:977	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp`	src/ProjectTreeMarks.ts:87	RegExp() called with a `_line` function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Remotes.ts:312	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	src/Remotes.ts:322	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`	src/Remotes.ts:96	JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method`	src/Utils.ts:339	Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`	src/dialogs/RemoteCommon.ts:15	JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`	src/ftp/Ftp.ts:131	JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/node/cli.ts:196	Detected that function argument `path` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`	src/node/process-utils.ts:89	Detected that function argument `_path` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/format-diff.html:11	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-diff-dialog.html:3	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-output.html:8	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-question-dialog.html:6	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-settings-dialog.html:138	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-settings-dialog.html:163	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-settings-dialog.html:230	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/git-settings-dialog.html:240	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.express.security.audit.xss.mustache.template-explicit-unescape`	templates/history-viewer.html:53	Detected an explicit unescape in a Mustache template, using triple braces '{{{...}}}' or ampersand '&'. If external data can reach these locations, your application is exposed to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If you must...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/typescript.lang.best-practice.moment-deprecated`	src/History.ts:3	Moment is a legacy project in maintenance mode. Consider using libraries that are actively supported, e.g. `dayjs`.	Lint
low	`opengrep/typescript.lang.best-practice.moment-deprecated`	src/Panel.ts:8	Moment is a legacy project in maintenance mode. Consider using libraries that are actively supported, e.g. `dayjs`.	Lint

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	2
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	37
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`334b702d2a35`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	70	70
2026-11-14	`334b702d2a35`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	70	70

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/brackets-userland/brackets-git
Commit: 334b702d2a35f62a2a863b9aaa25d1bec95c7ed7
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:03+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	none-detected	65%	100%
Code quality	70	adequate	90%	100%
Security	70	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Stylometry index: 0.18 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 2, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2016-02	1	0%
2016-03	2	0%
2016-04	2	0%
2016-05	169	0%
2016-08	8	0%
2016-09	7,488	0%
2016-10	447	0%
2016-11	833	0%
2016-12	396	0%
2017-01	631	0%
2017-07	242	0%
2018-01	1	0%

Evidence

step-by-step narration comment: // now we launch a diff to fill the gutters in our editors (src/GutterMa)
step-by-step narration comment: // now we are going to be paranoid and we will check if some mofo didn't change our diff (src/Panel.ts)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 4% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	90
Duplication	94
Code smells (Opengrep)	99
Tests and CI	15
Documentation	100
Type safety	40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 1,014; mean complexity 1.8, 90th percentile 3; 4 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 1.1% of 7,998 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 10,886 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: none

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 5 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	68
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`: Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `args`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized or sandboxed. [confidence low]	src/node/cli.ts:40
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`: Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `command`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized or sandboxed. [confidence low]	src/node/cli.ts:40
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`: Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `command`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized or sandboxed. [confidence low]	src/node/cli.ts:70
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`: Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `pid`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized or sandboxed. [confidence low]	src/node/process-utils.ts:32
high	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-child-process`: Detected calls to child_process from a function argument `pid`. This could lead to a command injection if the input is user controllable. Try to avoid calls to child_process, and if it is needed ensure user input is correctly sanitized or sandboxed. [confidence low]	src/node/process-utils.ts:37
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `lang` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	nls/generate.js:18
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-fs-filename`: Detected that function argument `lang` has entered the fs module. An attacker could potentially control the location of this file, to include going backwards in the directory with '../'. To address this, ensure that user-controlled variables in file paths are validated. [confidence low]	nls/generate.js:58
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`: JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	src/Branch.ts:144
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Branch.ts:336
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-method`: User controlled data in a jQuery's `.html(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/ChangelogDialog.ts:19
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`: JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	src/ChangelogDialog.ts:19
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method`: Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low]	src/Cli.ts:168
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`: JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	src/HistoryViewer.ts:52
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Panel.ts:957
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Panel.ts:961
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Panel.ts:965
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Panel.ts:968
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Panel.ts:977
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Panel.ts:1144
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.detect-non-literal-regexp`: RegExp() called with a `_line` function argument, this might allow an attacker to cause a Regular Expression Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) within your application as RegExP blocks the main thread. For this reason, it is recommended to use hardcoded regexes instead. If your regex is run on user-controlle [confidence low]	src/ProjectTreeMarks.ts:87
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`: JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	src/Remotes.ts:96
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Remotes.ts:312
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`: User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/Remotes.ts:322
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method`: Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low]	src/Utils.ts:339
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html`: JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low]	src/dialogs/RemoteCommon.ts:15

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 10,886; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
TypeScript	8,058
JavaScript	2,814
Shell	14