Leaderboard github.com

binoygeorge97/edu_blog

View repository ↗
Python
★ 0
commit 3848d7c3c4fe
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

68%

explicit

Confidence: 77%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

50/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

68% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 68% of first-party code added; an estimated 68% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share68%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share68%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)1.81

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	12	1,859	2026-06-21	2026-06-21

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-062,730 · 68% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 1,706 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 778 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	4.10	0.00	—
Security	0.00	0.00	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok13 items

attributed_commit_share: 41.4%
attributed_commits: 12
attributed_loc: 1,859
attributed_loc_share: 68.1%
commits: 29
effective_loc: 2,730
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok1 item

CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2026-06-21
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 736.50
measured_loc: 2,730
median_loc_per_hour: 72.38
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 7

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 9
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 3
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 1.81
lines_scanned: 2,484
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 3.62
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 1,706
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 25
other_lines: 778
quality:ai_findings: 7
quality:ai_per_kloc: 4.10
quality:other_findings: 0
quality:other_per_kloc: 0
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 0
security:other_per_kloc: 0

Code quality

50 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity78
Duplication100
Lint and smells49
Tests and CI0
Documentation40
Type safety63
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok2 items

complex_functions: 2
function_nloc: 1,421
functions: 132
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.61
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 8.4%

Duplication (jscpd)ok

compared_lines: 1,756
duplicated_lines: 0
duplicated_share: 0.0%
files: 25

Lintok

category:best-practice: 5
category:correctness: 2
findings: 7
scanned_lines: 2,484
weighted_findings: 7

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 20
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 2,484
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 83

Type safetyok1 item

TypeScript strict type checking: web/tsconfig.json web/tsconfig.json

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 1
escapes_per_kloc: 0.40

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 17 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependencies44
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 23
declared: 23
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 2,484
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 49
vulnerabilities: 17
vulnerable_packages: 8
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 7
vulns_low: 1
vulns_medium: 9
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

7 high16 medium1 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`osv/GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list`	app/agents/critics.py:23	Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list`	app/agents/critics.py:28	Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list?	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	eval/experiment.py:163	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	eval/experiment.py:50	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	eval/generate.py:122	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	eval/generate.py:47	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding`	eval/generate.py:95	Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8").	Lint
medium	`osv/GHSA-mf9w-mj56-hr94`	requirements-api.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2270, GHSA-mf9w-mj56-hr94; also in requirements.txt	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2285, GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rxff-vr5r-8cj5`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2024-153, GHSA-rxff-vr5r-8cj5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-vqwp-45wm-r9r5`	requirements.txt	[email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-212, GHSA-vqwp-45wm-r9r5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	web/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	7
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	17
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`3848d7c3c4fe`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	68%	50	72
2026-11-14	`3848d7c3c4fe`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	68%	50	72

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/binoygeorge97/edu_blog
Commit: 3848d7c3c4fe1d16413b8a3605976cbb68bc385c
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:03+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	68	explicit	77%	100%
Code quality	50	weak	90%	100%
Security	72	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 68% of first-party code added; an estimated 68% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 68.1%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 68.1%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	12	1,859

AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 1,706 of 2,484.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	4.103	0.0	n/a
Security	0.0	0.0	n/a

Stylometry index: 1.81 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 9). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-06	2,730	68%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (1787ca7a001d)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (98772d978e2e)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (50be6a5efdcd)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bc5876d4c4ed)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (933df9491602)
Claude Code: on merged branch (afda99a309) (4a1a4b3c1971)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (0bba8c4312c2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a47ff63e5bf7)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (5fcfa6ad2684)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a75ebf2e759c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f7dcd9f7cdc2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9f490209d45d)
CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	78
Duplication	100
Code smells (Opengrep)	49
Tests and CI	0
Documentation	40
Type safety	63
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 132; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 6; 2 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,756 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 2,484 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 17 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	44
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 17 in 8 packages (critical 0, high 7, medium 9, low 1)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`osv/GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-c83g-rgw3-j3cx	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	web/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	web/package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-mf9w-mj56-hr94`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2270, GHSA-mf9w-mj56-hr94; also in requirements.txt	requirements-api.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-rxff-vr5r-8cj5`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2024-153, GHSA-rxff-vr5r-8cj5	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-vqwp-45wm-r9r5`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-212, GHSA-vqwp-45wm-r9r5	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846`: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2285, GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846	requirements.txt
medium	`osv/GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5vr-8v7q-w6rv	web/package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp	web/package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	web/package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	web/package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	web/package-lock.json
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	web/package-lock.json

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 2,484; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
Python	1,550
TypeScript	934