Leaderboard github.com
bendc/sprint
A tiny, lightning fast jQuery-like library for modern browsers.
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
59/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
66/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2014-08560 · 0% AI
- 2014-09248 · 0% AI
- 2014-10700 · 0% AI
- 2014-11831 · 0% AI
- 2014-12759 · 0% AI
- 2015-01509 · 0% AI
- 2015-040 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 151
- effective_loc
- 3,607
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 0
- measured_loc
- 0
- median_loc_per_hour
- 0
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 0
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 1,407
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
59 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 12% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity70
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok2 items
- complex_functions
- 1
- function_nloc
- 1,422
- functions
- 173
- long_functions
- 1
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.62
- p90_ccn
- 6
- risky_nloc_share
- 11.9%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 1,003
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 1
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,407
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 142
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 1,407
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE.txt
LICENSE.txt
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 114
Type safetyskipped
Security
66 weak
Security posture is weak: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)57
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 5
- findings_high
- 2
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 3
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,407
- weighted_findings
- 2.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
2 high3 medium
5 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
sprint.js:920 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
sprint.js:920 | User controlled data in a `this.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
sprint.js:184 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.prototype-pollution.prototype-pollution-loop |
sprint.js:479 | Possibility of prototype polluting function detected. By adding or modifying attributes of an object prototype, it is possible to create attributes that exist on every object, or replace critical attributes with malicious ones. This can... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html |
sprint.js:916 | JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 5 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | a220796dc647 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 59 | 66 |
| 2026-11-14 | a220796dc647 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 59 | 66 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/bendc/sprint
- Commit:
a220796dc6470cc928726a3f15192ca5389af36c - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 59 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 66 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2014-08 | 560 | 0% |
| 2014-09 | 248 | 0% |
| 2014-10 | 700 | 0% |
| 2014-11 | 831 | 0% |
| 2014-12 | 759 | 0% |
| 2015-01 | 509 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 12% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 70 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 173; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 6; 1 complex and 1 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,003 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 1,407 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is weak: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 57 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
sprint.js:920 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
sprint.js:920 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method: Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
sprint.js:184 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.prototype-pollution.prototype-pollution-loop: Possibility of prototype polluting function detected. By adding or modifying attributes of an object prototype, it is possible to create attributes that exist on every object, or replace critical attributes with malicious ones. This can be problematic if the software depends on existence or non-exis [confidence low] |
sprint.js:479 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html: JQuery's html function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider text instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's HtmlUtils.setHtml(). [confidence low] |
sprint.js:916 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,407; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| JavaScript | 1,407 |