RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

appchemist/DevAI

  • View repository ↗
  • Shell
  • ★ 0
  • commit 02b06f772ac2
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
63%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

69/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

82/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files1
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-03243 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-043,231 · 0% AI
  3. 2026-065 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
92
effective_loc
3,479
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok1 item
artifacts
1
earliest_adoption
2026-04-07
tools_configured
1
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
325.87
measured_loc
3,479
median_loc_per_hour
65.01
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
12
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
569
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

69 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 4.87, no CI test run detected; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

How the score is built

  • Complexitynot measured
  • Duplication80
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI55
  • Documentation40
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)skipped
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
compared_lines
421
duplicated_lines
16
duplicated_share
3.8%
files
10
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
569
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
yes
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
25
cochange_share
64.0%
source_lines
569
test_lines
2,770
test_ratio
4.87
Documentationok1 item
  • README.md README.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
no
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
140
Type safetyskipped

Security

82 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
569
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

No line-level findings.

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityskipped—0
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1402b06f772ac2prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6982
2026-11-1402b06f772ac2prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%6982

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/appchemist/DevAI/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/appchemist/DevAI/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/appchemist/DevAI/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/appchemist/DevAI/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/appchemist/DevAI/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/appchemist/DevAI/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/appchemist/DevAI
  • Commit: 02b06f772ac2f237a11591ccdd3b6304e2a20a15
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 63% 100%
Code quality 69 adequate 90% 100%
Security 82 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-03 243 0%
2026-04 3,231 0%
2026-06 5 0%

Evidence

  • CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 4.87, no CI test run detected; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) n/a
Duplication 80
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 55
Documentation 40
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Duplicated lines: 3.8% of 421 compared
  • Tests: 2,770 test lines for 569 source lines (ratio 4.87); CI test commands: none detected; 64% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 569; test lines: 2,770
Language Lines
Shell 3,339