Leaderboard github.com
anhkgg/SuperWeChatPC
超级微信电脑客户端，支持多开、防消息撤销、语音消息备份...开放WeChatSDK
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 56%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
44/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
82/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.69
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2017-05514 · 0% AI
- 2017-060 · 0% AI
- 2018-11219 · 0% AI
- 2018-1235 · 0% AI
- 2019-023,006 · 0% AI
- 2019-032,539 · 0% AI
- 2019-061 · 0% AI
- 2019-070 · 0% AI
- 2019-08403 · 0% AI
- 2019-100 · 0% AI
- 2019-110 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 64
- effective_loc
- 6,717
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 580.75
- measured_loc
- 6,717
- median_loc_per_hour
- 98.39
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 4,723
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 2
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 6,717
- work_units
- 18
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 238.10
- releases
- 6
Coding styleok2 items
- assistant-style phrasing left in code: #error this stub requires an updated version of <rpcndr.h>
- assistant-style phrasing left in code: #error this stub requires an updated version of <rpcndr.h>
- count:assistant_voice
- 2
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 2
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.69
- lines_scanned
- 5,825
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0.34
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
44 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 6% of function code in complex or long functions; 34% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity85
- Duplication13
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation40
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok1 item
- complex_functions
- 1
- function_nloc
- 2,106
- functions
- 157
- long_functions
- 1
- many_param_functions
- 1
- mean_ccn
- 2.24
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 5.6%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: sdk/sdk.h:1 and src/WeChatSDK/sdk.h:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDK/resource.h:5 and src/WeChatSDKCore/resource.h:5
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDK/util.cpp:7 and src/WeChatSDKCore/util.cpp:4
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk.cpp:11 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk.cpp:36
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_c.c:6 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_h.h:6
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_c.c:12 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_s.c:12
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_c.c:117 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_c.c:136
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_c.c:148 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkdef_c.c:254
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkclk_h.h:12 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkdef_h.h:12
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkdef_c.c:6 and src/WeChatSDKCore/sdkdef_h.h:6
- compared_lines
- 3,748
- duplicated_lines
- 1,279
- duplicated_share
- 34.1%
- files
- 54
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 5,825
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 25
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 5,825
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok1 item
- readme.md
readme.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 33
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
82 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 6
- scanned_lines
- 5,825
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
No line-level findings.
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 35a15126bc35 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 44 | 82 |
| 2026-11-14 | 35a15126bc35 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 44 | 82 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/anhkgg/SuperWeChatPC
- Commit:
35a15126bc354742b0e2faf56ef8ce9a72e5b0f6 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 56% | 100% |
| Code quality | 44 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 82 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 0.69 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 2, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2017-05 | 514 | 0% |
| 2018-11 | 219 | 0% |
| 2018-12 | 35 | 0% |
| 2019-02 | 3,006 | 0% |
| 2019-03 | 2,539 | 0% |
| 2019-06 | 1 | 0% |
| 2019-08 | 403 | 0% |
Evidence
- assistant-style phrasing left in code: #error this stub requires an updated version of <rpcndr.h> (src/WeChatSD)
- assistant-style phrasing left in code: #error this stub requires an updated version of <rpcndr.h> (src/WeChatSD)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 6% of function code in complex or long functions; 34% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 85 |
| Duplication | 13 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 157; mean complexity 2.2, 90th percentile 4; 1 complex and 1 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 34.1% of 3,748 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 5,825 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 5,825; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C | 2,838 |
| C++ | 2,745 |
| C# | 113 |
| Python | 78 |
| Java | 51 |