andrewosh/cellarium
A playground for cellular automata
- Repository: https://github.com/andrewosh/cellarium
- Commit:
92e55d2d3011962d7b9dbb24f8b35f6b1426a6e1 - Generated: 2026-11-13T23:57:35+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 44% | 100% |
| Code quality | 43 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 81 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02 | 4,699 | 0% |
| 2026-03 | 1,342 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 41% of function code in complex or long functions; 8% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 29 |
| Duplication | 60 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 252; mean complexity 4.1, 90th percentile 9; 14 complex and 6 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 8.4% of 4,068 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 5,760 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- emit_spatial_op in macros/src/lower.rs: complexity 55, 268 lines
- emit_method_call in macros/src/lower.rs: complexity 49, 88 lines
- window_event in src/runtime.rs: complexity 48, 206 lines
- emit_fused_spatial_ops in macros/src/lower.rs: complexity 43, 143 lines
- validate_expr in macros/src/check.rs: complexity 38, 80 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 98 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| low | opengrep/rust.lang.security.args: args should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be relied upon for security purposes." [confidence high] |
src/runtime.rs:83 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 5,760; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Rust | 5,760 |