RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

andreamazz/BubbleTransition

A custom modal transition that presents and dismiss a controller with an expanding bubble effect.

  • View repository ↗
  • Swift
  • ★ 3,293
  • commit f1cab1fc6e24
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

62/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2015-05423 · 0% AI
  2. 2015-0659 · 0% AI
  3. 2015-080 · 0% AI
  4. 2015-0923 · 0% AI
  5. 2015-1057 · 0% AI
  6. 2015-111 · 0% AI
  7. 2016-020 · 0% AI
  8. 2016-033 · 0% AI
  9. 2016-0957 · 0% AI
  10. 2016-1214 · 0% AI
  11. 2017-020 · 0% AI
  12. 2017-030 · 0% AI
  13. 2017-042 · 0% AI
  14. 2017-090 · 0% AI
  15. 2017-120 · 0% AI
  16. 2018-04201 · 0% AI
  17. 2018-051 · 0% AI
  18. 2018-0617 · 0% AI
  19. 2018-07104 · 0% AI
  20. 2018-084 · 0% AI
  21. 2018-1114 · 0% AI
  22. 2019-010 · 0% AI
  23. 2019-030 · 0% AI
  24. 2019-080 · 0% AI
  25. 2020-031 · 0% AI
  26. 2020-0416 · 0% AI
  27. 2020-060 · 0% AI
  28. 2020-110 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
101
effective_loc
997
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
46.25
measured_loc
997
median_loc_per_hour
42.75
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
997
work_units
32
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
73.40
releases
20
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
448
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

62 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation85
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review process5

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
170
functions
18
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
1.94
p90_ccn
8
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
270
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
7
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
448
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
39
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
448
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok3 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
121
Type safetyskipped

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecard20

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardok10 items
aggregate
1.90
check:Binary-Artifacts
yes
check:Branch-Protection
no
check:CII-Best-Practices
no
check:Code-Review
yes
check:Fuzzing
no
check:License
yes
check:Maintained
no
check:SAST
no
check:Security-Policy
no
check:Signed-Releases
no
Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
4
scanned_lines
448
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
3.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
6
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

No line-level findings.

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityokscorecard v5.6.00
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14f1cab1fc6e24prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6272
2026-11-14f1cab1fc6e24prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%6272

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/andreamazz/BubbleTransition/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/andreamazz/BubbleTransition/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/andreamazz/BubbleTransition/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/andreamazz/BubbleTransition/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/andreamazz/BubbleTransition/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/andreamazz/BubbleTransition/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 62 weak 90% 100%
Security 72 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2016-03 3 0%
2016-09 57 0%
2016-12 14 0%
2017-04 2 0%
2018-04 201 0%
2018-05 1 0%
2018-06 17 0%
2018-07 104 0%
2018-08 4 0%
2018-11 14 0%
2020-03 1 0%
2020-04 16 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 85
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) 5
  • Functions: 18; mean complexity 1.9, 90th percentile 8; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 270 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 448 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 20
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
  • OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 1.9/10 (published 2026-11-09)

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 448; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Swift 429
C 19