RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

aletheap/slack-exporter

Export Slack private channels to the official Slack export format

  • View repository ↗
  • Python
  • ★ 0
  • commit d4a178065f0d
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence
78%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

34/100

poor

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

85/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share100%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share100%
  • AI tool configuration files1
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)75.88

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code322,5292026-03-102026-03-28

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-032,529 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 2,102 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality19.98——
Security0.00——

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items
attributed_commit_share
94.1%
attributed_commits
32
attributed_loc
2,529
attributed_loc_share
100.0%
commits
34
effective_loc
2,529
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok1 item
artifacts
1
earliest_adoption
2026-03-10
tools_configured
1
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
379.59
measured_loc
2,529
median_loc_per_hour
245.79
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
7
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok8 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
303
count:narrated_steps
8
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
1
files:narrated_steps
1
files:placeholder
0
index
75.88
lines_scanned
2,102
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
144.15
per_kloc:narrated_steps
3.81
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
2,102
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
2
other_lines
0
quality:ai_findings
42
quality:ai_per_kloc
19.98
quality:other_findings
0
security:ai_findings
0
security:ai_per_kloc
0
security:other_findings
0

Code quality

34 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity52
  • Duplication93
  • Lint and smells1
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation40
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok2 items
complex_functions
2
function_nloc
883
functions
50
long_functions
1
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
5.36
p90_ccn
13
risky_nloc_share
21.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
compared_lines
1,759
duplicated_lines
22
duplicated_share
1.2%
files
2
Lintok
category:maintainability
42
findings
42
scanned_lines
2,102
weighted_findings
42
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
29
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
2,102
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok1 item
  • README.md README.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
no
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
90
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

85 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 8 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependencies83
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture20
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
3
declared
3
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
2,102
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
11
vulnerabilities
8
vulnerable_packages
2
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
1
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
5
vulns_unknown
2
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
100.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

1 high49 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high osv/GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2018-28, GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:105 key `"wave"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:181 key `"cup_with_straw"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:183 key `"cup_with_straw"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:243 key `"boom"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:243 key `"anger"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:243 key `"100"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:244 key `"moneybag"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:248 key `"mag"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:250 key `"hammer"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:253 key `"wrench"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:257 key `"package"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:257 key `"mailbox"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:258 key `"inbox_tray"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:258 key `"outbox_tray"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:259 key `"wastebasket"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:260 key `"calendar_spiral"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:264 key `"pencil"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:274 key `"inbox_tray"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:274 key `"outbox_tray"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:275 key `"package"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:275 key `"mailbox"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:277 key `"pencil"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:279 key `"calendar"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:279 key `"calendar_spiral"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:280 key `"wastebasket"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:281 key `"telephone_receiver"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:291 key `"telephone_receiver"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:298 key `"calendar"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:299 key `"moneybag"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:300 key `"hammer"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:300 key `"wrench"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:301 key `"mag"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:328 key `"sos"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:331 key `"up"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:332 key `"sos"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:332 key `"up"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:338 key `"100"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:367 key `"anger"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:367 key `"boom"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:66 key `"poop"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:68 key `"poop"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.useless-literal slack_html.py:73 key `"wave"` is uselessly assigned twice Lint
medium osv/GHSA-652x-xj99-gmcc requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2014-14, GHSA-652x-xj99-gmcc Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1872, GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56 requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1873, GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-cfj3-7x9c-4p3h requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2014-13, GHSA-cfj3-7x9c-4p3h Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2 requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2275, GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/PYSEC-2015-17 requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2015-17 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/PYSEC-2017-74 requirements.txt [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2017-74 Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41442
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.18
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14d4a178065f0dprov-5+qual-2+sec-2100%3485
2026-11-14d4a178065f0dprov-4+qual-2+sec-2100%3485

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/aletheap/slack-exporter/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/aletheap/slack-exporter/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/aletheap/slack-exporter/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/aletheap/slack-exporter/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/aletheap/slack-exporter/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/aletheap/slack-exporter/)
Full text report

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 100 explicit 78% 100%
Code quality 34 poor 90% 100%
Security 85 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 32 2,529
  • AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 2,102 of 2,102.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 75.88 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 8, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 303). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-03 2,529 100%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (d4a178065f0d)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4da3479ff13f)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (fde93ae2ce70)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4a47ec74efcf)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8ae9bc66bd4f)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bba43de62c31)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (29b9eb178f72)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (983310100295)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a899376607f9)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (0f9a08b41957)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4abace3de9bb)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (39472792fb24)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ce0871b92de1)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c365b62cede1)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a69f3344eaaf)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 52
Duplication 93
Code smells (Opengrep) 1
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 40
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 50; mean complexity 5.4, 90th percentile 13; 2 complex and 1 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 1.2% of 1,759 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 2,102 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 8 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 83
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 20
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 8 in 2 packages (critical 0, high 1, medium 5, low 0)

  • Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high osv/GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2018-28, GHSA-x84v-xcm2-53pg requirements.txt
medium osv/GHSA-cfj3-7x9c-4p3h: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2014-13, GHSA-cfj3-7x9c-4p3h requirements.txt
medium osv/GHSA-652x-xj99-gmcc: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2014-14, GHSA-652x-xj99-gmcc requirements.txt
medium osv/PYSEC-2015-17: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2015-17 requirements.txt
medium osv/GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1872, GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 requirements.txt
medium osv/GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1873, GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56 requirements.txt
medium osv/GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-2275, GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2 requirements.txt
medium osv/PYSEC-2017-74: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2017-74 requirements.txt

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 2,102; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Python 2,102