Leaderboard github.com

aileo/pensa

Organize family gifts without carrying it all in your head. Everyone's wishes, the dates coming up and who gives what live in one place — and nobody ever sees what is meant for them.

View repository ↗
TypeScript
★ 0
commit f10cc33fc364
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

80/100

strong

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

55/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share100%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share100%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace1
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.08

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
GitHub Copilot coding agent	61	11,404	2026-09-29	2026-10-31

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-095,437 · 100% AI
2026-105,967 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 6,247 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	1.12	—	—
Security	0.32	—	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items

attributed_commit_share: 98.4%
attributed_commits: 61
attributed_loc: 11,404
attributed_loc_share: 100.0%
commits: 62
effective_loc: 11,404
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok1 item

2,265 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (566 lines/hour, 1 commit session)

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 2,265
flagged_loc_share: 19.9%
flagged_units: 1
max_loc_per_hour: 770
measured_loc: 11,404
median_loc_per_hour: 226.11
pr_timed_units: 14
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 25

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 11,760
releases: 10

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 1
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 1
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.08
lines_scanned: 6,247
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0.16
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 6,247
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 65
other_lines: 0
quality:ai_findings: 7
quality:ai_per_kloc: 1.12
quality:other_findings: 0
security:ai_findings: 2
security:ai_per_kloc: 0.32
security:other_findings: 0

Code quality

80 strong

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.30, CI runs tests; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity62
Duplication88
Lint and smells80
Tests and CI80
Documentation100
Type safety100
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 16
function_nloc: 4,772
functions: 895
long_functions: 2
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.59
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 16.2%

Duplication (jscpd)ok4 items

compared_lines: 5,107
duplicated_lines: 106
duplicated_share: 2.1%
files: 65

Lintok

category:best-practice: 5
category:correctness: 2
findings: 7
scanned_lines: 6,077
weighted_findings: 5.50

Tests and CIok4 items

CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/pages.yml .github/workflows/pages.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
CI runs tests (npm test)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 3
cochange_commits: 45
cochange_share: 64.4%
source_lines: 6,247
test_lines: 1,867
test_ratio: 0.30

Documentationok4 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE
docs/CONTRIBUTING.md docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md

check:changelog: yes
check:contributing: yes
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 97

Type safetyok1 item

TypeScript strict type checking: apps/api/tsconfig.json apps/api/tsconfig.json

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: yes
escapes: 0
escapes_per_kloc: 0

Security

55 weak

Security posture is weak: 31 known vulnerabilities in 11 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 18 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)88
Vulnerable dependencies35
CI workflows2
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 30
declared: 30
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 3
findings_high: 1
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 2
parse_errors: 2
scanned_lines: 6,077
weighted_findings: 2.30

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 63
vulnerabilities: 31
vulnerable_packages: 11
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 9
vulns_low: 2
vulns_medium: 20
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 27
findings_high: 18
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 9
penalty: 231.60
workflows: 3

Security postureok1 item

package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) package.json

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: no
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 40.3%
unpinned_manifests: 1

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

28 high36 medium4 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:21	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:22	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:61	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:62	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:83	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:84	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:85	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/pages.yml:23	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/pages.yml:24	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/pages.yml:43	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/pages.yml:45	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/pages.yml:63	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:31	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:33	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:35	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:37	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:44	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:56	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`osv/GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user`	apps/web/Dockerfile:18	By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	apps/web/src/components/atoms/FormLabel.tsx:4	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	apps/web/src/components/atoms/SelectInput.tsx:4	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	apps/web/src/components/atoms/TextArea.tsx:4	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-spreading`	apps/web/src/components/atoms/TextInput.tsx:4	It's best practice to explicitly pass props to an HTML component rather than use the spread operator. The spread operator risks passing invalid HTML props to an HTML element, which can cause console warnings or worse, give malicious...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/typescript.react.best-practice.react-props-in-state`	apps/web/src/reorder.ts:88	Copying a prop into state in React -- this is bad practice as all updates to it are ignored. Instead, read props directly in your component and avoid copying props into state.	Lint
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:1	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:21	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:34	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:61	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:76	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:83	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/pages.yml:23	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/release.yml:31	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4qv8-2p9j-2685`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4qv8-2p9j-2685	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-55wc-3pg8-jfw6`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-55wc-3pg8-jfw6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-9fm3-97px-rjf6`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9fm3-97px-rjf6	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-f72v-6w45-q472	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-qxg6-89mg-rqv8`	apps/api/package-lock.json	@vitest/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qxg6-89mg-rqv8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rxp7-6hxx-x8q5`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rxp7-6hxx-x8q5	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-xp26-3454-mjgp`	apps/api/package-lock.json	@vitest/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xp26-3454-mjgp	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector`	apps/api/src/metadata.ts:311	User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string`	site/.vitepress/config.ts:76	This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS)....	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	apps/web/src/routes.ts:53	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator`	apps/web/src/routes.ts:53	This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'?	Lint
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	apps/api/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	site/package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	7
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	27
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	31
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	3
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`f10cc33fc364`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	100%	80	55
2026-11-14	`f10cc33fc364`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	100%	80	55

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/aileo/pensa/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/aileo/pensa/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/aileo/pensa/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/aileo/pensa/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/aileo/pensa/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/aileo/pensa/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/aileo/pensa
Commit: f10cc33fc364c99149236d17184a4acf18e452de
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	100	explicit	85%	100%
Code quality	80	strong	90%	100%
Security	55	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
GitHub Copilot coding agent	61	11,404

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 6,247 of 6,247.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Stylometry index: 0.08 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-09	5,437	100%
2026-10	5,967	100%

Evidence

GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (f10cc33fc364)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (6eee32e8380f)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (682fce4cfb44)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (a53d036c1cbb)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (ebe6fcba28e1)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (6becadea6cee)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (4fad5342db8c)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (00659c203982)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (f7ab5405c065)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (bf7a9d18a414)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (b1cbf34a535f)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (a520caa0d862)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (3684084f457a)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (cf5d282ca66e)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Copilot' (e6f72aac3127)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.30, CI runs tests; 16% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	62
Duplication	88
Code smells (Opengrep)	80
Tests and CI	80
Documentation	100
Type safety	100
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 895; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 5; 16 complex and 2 long functions
Duplicated lines: 2.1% of 5,107 compared
Tests: 1,867 test lines for 6,247 source lines (ratio 0.30); CI test commands: npm test; 64% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: none

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 31 known vulnerabilities in 11 dependencies; 1 high-severity SAST findings; 18 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	88
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	35
CI workflows (zizmor)	2
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 31 in 11 packages (critical 0, high 9, medium 20, low 2)
Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user`: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium]	apps/web/Dockerfile:18
high	`osv/GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-2m5v-pch6-74hx	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4w7w-5xrc-9h26	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qrxm-fqhp-jwvm	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xjj6-f33q-929c	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm; also in apps/web/package-lock.json	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5	apps/api/package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	site/package-lock.json
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:21
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:22
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:61
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:62
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:83
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:84
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:85
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/pages.yml:23
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/pages.yml:24
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/pages.yml:43
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/pages.yml:45
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/pages.yml:63
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:31
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:33
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:35

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 6,247; test lines: 1,867

Language	Lines
TypeScript	7,615
JavaScript	329
SQL	170