RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Yurzi/nvpaper

Minimal pure-Rust video wallpaper for niri / wlr-layer-shell compositors, with dma-buf zerocopy

  • View repository ↗
  • Rust
  • ★ 0
  • commit 76c364076187
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence
70%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

55/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

68/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share100%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share100%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code22,2722026-06-272026-06-27

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-062,272 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 2,272 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.00——
Security9.68——

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok3 items
attributed_commit_share
100.0%
attributed_commits
2
attributed_loc
2,272
attributed_loc_share
100.0%
commits
2
effective_loc
2,272
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
2,272
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
0
measured_loc
0
median_loc_per_hour
0
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
0
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
2,272
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
2,272
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
8
other_lines
0
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:ai_per_kloc
0
quality:other_findings
0
security:ai_findings
22
security:ai_per_kloc
9.68
security:other_findings
0

Code quality

55 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity51
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok4 items
complex_functions
3
function_nloc
1,640
functions
70
long_functions
3
many_param_functions
1
mean_ccn
4.46
p90_ccn
15
risky_nloc_share
22.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
1,675
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
8
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
2,272
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
1
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
2,272
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
128
Type safetyskipped

Security

68 weak

Security posture is weak: 5 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)43
  • Vulnerable dependencies75
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture20
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
12
declared
12
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
22
findings_high
0
findings_low
22
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
2,272
weighted_findings
5.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
17
vulnerabilities
5
vulnerable_packages
4
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
2
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
0
vulns_unknown
3
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
100.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

2 high3 medium22 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0194 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0195 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0195 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0388 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0388 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Cargo.lock [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:103 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:110 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:120 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:125 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:143 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:165 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:172 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:189 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:192 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:193 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:203 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:265 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:268 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:287 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:289 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:292 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:300 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:304 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:319 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:359 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage src/gpu/mod.rs:458 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.args src/main.rs:79 args should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be relied... Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.15
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41422
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1476c364076187prov-5+qual-2+sec-2100%5568
2026-11-1476c364076187prov-4+qual-2+sec-2100%5568

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/Yurzi/nvpaper
  • Commit: 76c3640761879784ef5f9bb48fd1fa5ef4c3197b
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 100 explicit 70% 100%
Code quality 55 weak 90% 100%
Security 68 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 2 2,272

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 2,272 of 2,272.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-06 2,272 100%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (76c364076187)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7b8fb4f7a9fa)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 22% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 51
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 70; mean complexity 4.5, 90th percentile 15; 3 complex and 3 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,675 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 2,272 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 5 known vulnerabilities in 4 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 43
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 75
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 20
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 5 in 4 packages (critical 0, high 2, medium 0, low 0)

  • Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0194: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0194 Cargo.lock
high osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0195: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0195 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0190: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0190 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2024-0388: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2024-0388 Cargo.lock
medium osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0486: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0486 Cargo.lock
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:103
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:110
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:120
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:125
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:143
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:165
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:172
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:189
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:192
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:193
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:203
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:265
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:268
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:287
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:289
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:292
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:300
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:304
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:319
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] src/gpu/mod.rs:359

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 2,272; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Rust 2,272