Leaderboard github.com
VirologyCharite/iterated-consensus
Iteratively build a consensus sequence from a BAM/FASTQ by remapping against each new consensus until convergence
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 43%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
63/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
74/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts29%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace1
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-087,757 · 0% AI
- 2026-10228 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 13
- effective_loc
- 7,985
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok1 item
- excluded_import_loc
- 3,220
- flagged_loc
- 2,338
- flagged_loc_share
- 49.1%
- flagged_units
- 1
- max_loc_per_hour
- 695.86
- measured_loc
- 4,765
- median_loc_per_hour
- 105.92
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 8
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 3,269
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
63 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 1.33, no CI test run detected; 17% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: lint.
How the score is built
- Complexity60
- Duplication100
- Lint and smells37
- Tests and CI55
- Documentation85
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok2 items
- run_cmd in src/iterated_consensus/cli.py: complexity 21, 131 lines
- run in src/iterated_consensus/runner.py: complexity 20, 168 lines
- complex_functions
- 2
- function_nloc
- 1,784
- functions
- 115
- long_functions
- 2
- many_param_functions
- 3
- mean_ccn
- 4.34
- p90_ccn
- 9
- risky_nloc_share
- 16.8%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
- compared_lines
- 2,514
- duplicated_lines
- 0
- duplicated_share
- 0.0%
- files
- 16
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 1
- category:correctness
- 5
- category:maintainability
- 7
- findings
- 13
- scanned_lines
- 3,269
- weighted_findings
- 13
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 11
- cochange_share
- 90.9%
- source_lines
- 3,269
- test_lines
- 4,338
- test_ratio
- 1.33
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CHANGELOG.md
CHANGELOG.md
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 629
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 2
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0.62
Security
74 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 31 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies; 3 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)76
- Vulnerable dependencies77
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 8
- declared
- 8
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 3
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 3,269
- weighted_findings
- 2.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 16
- vulnerabilities
- 31
- vulnerable_packages
- 2
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 11
- vulns_low
- 5
- vulns_medium
- 15
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
14 high29 medium5 low
48 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:106 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:53 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:59 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | osv/GHSA-394h-qwmc-48pf |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-394h-qwmc-48pf | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-5vjq-rrrf-7h2q |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-5vjq-rrrf-7h2q | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-8rjx-v5ww-45pp |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-8rjx-v5ww-45pp | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4011, GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-c947-3pg5-gm8q |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-c947-3pg5-gm8q | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-c978-59m8-c77v |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-c978-59m8-c77v | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-p58f-9548-mpm2 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4013, GHSA-p58f-9548-mpm2 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-vxj4-q4g9-crj7 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-vxj4-q4g9-crj7 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-x78j-v8h9-3j2q |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4014, GHSA-x78j-v8h9-3j2q | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/bam.py:148 | Is "is_unmapped" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant read.is_unmapped() because read.is_unmapped is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/bam.py:148 | Is "is_secondary" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant read.is_secondary() because read.is_secondary is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/bam.py:149 | Is "is_supplementary" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant read.is_supplementary() because read.is_supplementary is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:107 | Is "is_shell" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant rendered.is_shell() because rendered.is_shell is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:53 | Is "is_shell" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant cmd.is_shell() because cmd.is_shell is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:61 | Is "is_shell" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant cmd.is_shell() because cmd.is_shell is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
src/iterated_consensus/report.py:111 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
src/iterated_consensus/report.py:118 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
src/iterated_consensus/report.py:210 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.manual-defaultdict-list-create |
src/iterated_consensus/report.py:233 | manually creating a defaultdict - use collections.defaultdict(list) | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
src/iterated_consensus/report.py:97 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.maintainability.is-function-without-parentheses |
src/iterated_consensus/runner.py:253 | Is "is_whole_file" a function or an attribute? If it is a function, you may have meant resolved.is_whole_file() because resolved.is_whole_file is always true. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
src/iterated_consensus/runner.py:485 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected |
src/iterated_consensus/reference.py:121 | Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-43mp-35q3-x3fq |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-43mp-35q3-x3fq | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-558c-9hv2-4prj |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-558c-9hv2-4prj | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-69hj-f68j-2879 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-69hj-f68j-2879 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-8mx5-7m5m-r77g |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-8mx5-7m5m-r77g | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-9c4x-gm8v-wgc4 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-9c4x-gm8v-wgc4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-9h9j-4vrj-gf7g |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4012, GHSA-9h9j-4vrj-gf7g | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-cw65-gx24-rc82 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-cw65-gx24-rc82 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-cwqr-hh33-gh44 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-cwqr-hh33-gh44 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-fc2g-4w5p-6whm |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-fc2g-4w5p-6whm | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-fq56-3cx3-fjxp |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-fq56-3cx3-fjxp | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-hhxq-47xx-j5xx |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-hhxq-47xx-j5xx | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-j8f7-rjxc-mr56 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-j8f7-rjxc-mr56 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-m462-7rxw-wvpg |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-m462-7rxw-wvpg | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-494p-63j8-28p3 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-494p-63j8-28p3 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-9vhv-jxww-xfm5 |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-9vhv-jxww-xfm5 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-cx28-75q4-x26q |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-cx28-75q4-x26q | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | osv/GHSA-qmx5-4p3x-wvqf |
uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-qmx5-4p3x-wvqf | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 13 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 31 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 4 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 24047fe090a6 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 63 | 74 |
| 2026-11-14 | 24047fe090a6 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 63 | 74 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/VirologyCharite/iterated-consensus
- Commit:
24047fe090a685f614ea1095a88838d1391a2a48 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 43% | 100% |
| Code quality | 63 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 74 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 29.3%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 7,757 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 228 | 0% |
Evidence
- 2,338 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (584 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (cbe7133b9a2d)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 1.33, no CI test run detected; 17% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: lint.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 60 |
| Duplication | 100 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 37 |
| Tests and CI | 55 |
| Documentation | 85 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 115; mean complexity 4.3, 90th percentile 9; 2 complex and 2 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 2,514 compared
- Tests: 4,338 test lines for 3,269 source lines (ratio 1.33); CI test commands: none detected; 91% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing
Most complex functions:
- run_cmd in src/iterated_consensus/cli.py: complexity 21, 131 lines
- run in src/iterated_consensus/runner.py: complexity 20, 168 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 31 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies; 3 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 76 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 77 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 31 in 2 packages (critical 0, high 11, medium 15, low 5)
-
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:53 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:59 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/iterated_consensus/commands.py:106 |
| high | osv/GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8 |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4011, GHSA-94p9-xgh2-xp45 |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-p58f-9548-mpm2: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4013, GHSA-p58f-9548-mpm2 |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-x78j-v8h9-3j2q: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4014, GHSA-x78j-v8h9-3j2q |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-394h-qwmc-48pf: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-394h-qwmc-48pf |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-5vjq-rrrf-7h2q: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-5vjq-rrrf-7h2q |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-6w3r-xr62-4xcp |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-8rjx-v5ww-45pp: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-8rjx-v5ww-45pp |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-c947-3pg5-gm8q: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-c947-3pg5-gm8q |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-c978-59m8-c77v: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-c978-59m8-c77v |
uv.lock |
| high | osv/GHSA-vxj4-q4g9-crj7: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-vxj4-q4g9-crj7 |
uv.lock |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dynamic-urllib-use-detected: Detected a dynamic value being used with urllib. urllib supports 'file://' schemes, so a dynamic value controlled by a malicious actor may allow them to read arbitrary files. Audit uses of urllib calls to ensure user data cannot control the URLs, or consider using the 'requests' library instead. [confidence low] |
src/iterated_consensus/reference.py:121 |
| medium | osv/GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-6627-m3xw-93mp |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-69hj-f68j-2879: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-69hj-f68j-2879 |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-8mx5-7m5m-r77g: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-8mx5-7m5m-r77g |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-9c4x-gm8v-wgc4: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-9c4x-gm8v-wgc4 |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-cwqr-hh33-gh44: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-cwqr-hh33-gh44 |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-fq56-3cx3-fjxp: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-fq56-3cx3-fjxp |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-j8f7-rjxc-mr56: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-j8f7-rjxc-mr56 |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-m462-7rxw-wvpg: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-m462-7rxw-wvpg |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by GHSA-rfpc-qcw5-3pc4 |
uv.lock |
| medium | osv/GHSA-9h9j-4vrj-gf7g: [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-4012, GHSA-9h9j-4vrj-gf7g |
uv.lock |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 3,269; test lines: 4,338
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 7,586 |
| Shell | 21 |