RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

ValveSoftware/ToGL

Direct3D to OpenGL abstraction layer

  • View repository ↗
  • C++
  • ★ 2,094
  • commit 7b64367f0e67
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
41%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

37/100

poor

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

81/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.08

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2014-0338,713 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
2
effective_loc
38,713
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
37,965
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
187
measured_loc
748
median_loc_per_hour
187
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
748
work_units
1
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok3 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
3
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
2
files:placeholder
0
index
0.08
lines_scanned
38,713
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.08
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

37 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 45% of function code in complex or long functions; 13% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity26
  • Duplication45
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation45
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
49
function_nloc
19,519
functions
928
long_functions
32
many_param_functions
25
mean_ccn
4.85
p90_ccn
9
risky_nloc_share
45.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
25,590
duplicated_lines
3,392
duplicated_share
13.3%
files
35
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
38,713
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
2
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
38,713
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
no
readme_lines
13
Type safetyskipped

Security

81 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)98
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
9
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
9
parse_errors
12
scanned_lines
38,713
weighted_findings
2.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

9 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1181 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1408 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1578 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1882 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:75 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:899 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:956 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-string-copy-fn public/togl/linuxwin/glmgrbasics.h:183 Finding triggers whenever there is a strcpy or strncpy used. This is an issue because strcpy does not affirm the size of the destination array and strncpy will not automatically NULL-terminate strings. This can lead to buffer overflows,... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset togl/linuxwin/mach_override.c:675 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4149
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-147b64367f0e67prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%3781
2026-11-147b64367f0e67prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%3781

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/ValveSoftware/ToGL
  • Commit: 7b64367f0e67b29bdc3343f43e440059c591216b
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 41% 100%
Code quality 37 poor 90% 100%
Security 81 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 0.08 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 3, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2014-03 38,713 0%

Evidence

  • step-by-step narration comment: // now we know enough to allocate and populate the new tex layout. (togl/linuxwi)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // finally, disable all of them if commandline did not say "enable spew" (togl/linuxwi)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // then, move cursor to next line. (togl/linuxwi)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 45% of function code in complex or long functions; 13% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 26
Duplication 45
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 45
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 928; mean complexity 4.8, 90th percentile 9; 49 complex and 32 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 13.3% of 25,590 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 38,713 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: readme, contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 98
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:75
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:899
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:956
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1181
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1408
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1578
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgr.h:1882
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-string-copy-fn: Finding triggers whenever there is a strcpy or strncpy used. This is an issue because strcpy does not affirm the size of the destination array and strncpy will not automatically NULL-terminate strings. This can lead to buffer overflows, which can cause program crashes and potentially let an attacker [confidence low] public/togl/linuxwin/glmgrbasics.h:183
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] togl/linuxwin/mach_override.c:675

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 38,713; test lines: 0
Language Lines
C++ 28,632
C 10,081