Leaderboard github.com
TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer
Peer-to-peer file transfer for Windows, macOS and Android.
AI provenance
100%
explicit
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
77/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
56/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
100% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share100%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share100%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace4
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.04
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 59 | 35,358 | 2026-10-10 | 2026-11-10 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-1030,523 · 100% AI
- 2026-114,841 · 100% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 28,032 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 1.00 | — | — |
| Security | 1.78 | — | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok26 items
- Claude Code: 59 attributed commits, 35,358 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 95.2%
- attributed_commits
- 59
- attributed_loc
- 35,358
- attributed_loc_share
- 100.0%
- commits
- 62
- effective_loc
- 35,364
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok4 items
- 1,674 lines of first-party code in ~1.3h (1,267 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 1,579 lines of first-party code in ~2.2h (729 lines/hour, 4 commit session)
- 4,423 lines of first-party code in ~6.2h (715 lines/hour, 8 commit session)
- 2,186 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (546 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- excluded_import_loc
- 18,209
- flagged_loc
- 9,862
- flagged_loc_share
- 57.5%
- flagged_units
- 4
- max_loc_per_hour
- 1,266.85
- measured_loc
- 17,155
- median_loc_per_hour
- 359.06
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 20
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 30,404.40
- releases
- 16
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 2
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 2
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.04
- lines_scanned
- 28,032
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0.07
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 28,032
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 195
- other_lines
- 0
- quality:ai_findings
- 28
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 1.00
- quality:other_findings
- 0
- security:ai_findings
- 50
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 1.78
- security:other_findings
- 0
Code quality
77 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.22, CI runs tests; 10% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
How the score is built
- Complexity75
- Duplication88
- Lint and smells85
- Tests and CI76
- Documentation65
- Type safety60
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- runCommand in cmd/tpcli/main.go: complexity 55, 193 lines
- handleIncoming in internal/node/node.go: complexity 31, 109 lines
- connect in internal/node/connect.go: complexity 30, 102 lines
- start in cmd/server/links.go: complexity 28, 106 lines
- Send in internal/transfer/sender.go: complexity 28, 98 lines
- upsertTransfer in frontend/src/lib/state.svelte.ts: complexity 27, 37 lines
- serve in internal/linkshare/linkshare.go: complexity 25, 83 lines
- handleLinkHost in internal/server/links.go: complexity 25, 76 lines
- handleRegister in internal/server/server.go: complexity 24, 73 lines
- receiveFile in internal/transfer/receiver.go: complexity 24, 88 lines
- complex_functions
- 20
- function_nloc
- 15,960
- functions
- 2,131
- long_functions
- 4
- many_param_functions
- 5
- mean_ccn
- 2.73
- p90_ccn
- 6
- risky_nloc_share
- 9.5%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: cmd/server/links.go:259 and cmd/server/links.go:308
- 6+ duplicated lines: cmd/tpcli/main.go:248 and cmd/tpcli/main.go:296
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/App.svelte:82 and frontend/src/lib/components/Pager.svelte:157
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/components/ComposeBar.svelte:124 and frontend/src/lib/components/SendChooser.svelte:89
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/components/PeerCard.svelte:291 and frontend/src/lib/components/PeerCard.svelte:302
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/components/ShareSheet.svelte:66 and frontend/src/lib/components/TextDialog.svelte:70
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/components/Sidebar.svelte:10 and frontend/src/lib/components/TabBar.svelte:11
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/components/Sidebar.svelte:23 and frontend/src/lib/pages/SettingsPage.svelte:181
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/format.ts:3 and web/src/main.ts:24
- 6+ duplicated lines: frontend/src/lib/i18n.svelte.ts:70 and web/src/i18n.ts:17
- compared_lines
- 20,651
- duplicated_lines
- 457
- duplicated_share
- 2.2%
- files
- 195
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 1
- category:correctness
- 27
- findings
- 28
- scanned_lines
- 27,758
- weighted_findings
- 17.50
Tests and CIok2 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/build.yml
.github/workflows/build.yml - CI runs tests (go test)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 35
- cochange_share
- 71.4%
- source_lines
- 28,032
- test_lines
- 6,090
- test_ratio
- 0.22
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 196
Type safetyok1 item
- TypeScript strict type checking: frontend/tsconfig.node.json
frontend/tsconfig.node.json
- check:low_escape_density
- no
- check:strict_config
- yes
- escapes
- 45
- escapes_per_kloc
- 14.25
Security
56 weak
Security posture is weak: 22 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 32 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets97
- Static analysis (SAST)79
- Vulnerable dependencies50
- CI workflows0
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 16
- declared
- 16
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 1
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 52
- findings_high
- 8
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 44
- parse_errors
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 27,758
- weighted_findings
- 18.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 41
- vulnerabilities
- 22
- vulnerable_packages
- 8
- vulns_critical
- 1
- vulns_high
- 5
- vulns_low
- 0
- vulns_medium
- 13
- vulns_unknown
- 3
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 39
- findings_high
- 32
- findings_low
- 1
- findings_medium
- 6
- penalty
- 315.60
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok1 item
- frontend/wailsjs/runtime/package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies)
frontend/wailsjs/runtime/package.json
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- no
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 1.6%
- unpinned_manifests
- 1
Release downloadsok5 items
- release v0.2.6 ships TropicalPeer-0.2.6.apk (5 downloads)
- release v0.2.6 ships TropicalPeer-0.2.6.dmg (0 downloads)
- release v0.2.6 ships TropicalPeer-0.2.6.exe (0 downloads)
- release v0.2.6 ships tropicalpeer-server-windows-amd64.exe (0 downloads)
- release v0.2.6 ships tropicalpeer-server-windows-arm64.exe (0 downloads)
- binary_assets
- 50
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
1 critical45 high80 medium15 low1 info
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| critical | osv/GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8 |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6839, GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:117 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:127 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:128 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:128 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:131 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:143 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/build.yml:25 | overly broad permissions [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:31 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:32 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:32 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:41 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:42 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:42 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:45 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:45 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:49 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:58 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:59 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:59 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:62 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:62 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:66 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:75 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:76 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:76 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:80 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:89 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:90 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:90 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build.yml:93 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:93 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:96 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | osv/GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4 |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6873, GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6840, GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6842, GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | osv/GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6293, GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command |
internal/desktopapp/update_darwin.go:71 | Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command |
internal/desktopapp/update_windows.go:65 | Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:3 | Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | User controlled data in a `ye.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket |
web/src/link.ts:88 | Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
web/src/main.ts:13 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
web/src/main.ts:13 | User controlled data in a `view.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
cmd/server/dnscert.go:81 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/desktopapp/notify_windows.go:28 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/desktopapp/update.go:75 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/identity/identity.go:74 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/node/lock.go:20 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.best-practice.hidden-goroutine |
internal/node/predict.go:138 | Detected a hidden goroutine. Function invocations are expected to synchronous, and this function will execute asynchronously because all it does is call a goroutine. Instead, remove the internal goroutine and call the function using 'go'. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/node/settings.go:56 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/peers/store.go:302 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/peers/store.go:315 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/transfer/receiver.go:295 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/transfer/receiver.go:483 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/transfer/receiver.go:489 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/transfer/receiver.go:640 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission |
internal/update/update.go:129 | Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... | Lint |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:127 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:31 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:41 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:58 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:75 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:89 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity |
frontend/android/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:13 | The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-8g5g-mxqh-grgj |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-8g5g-mxqh-grgj; also in web/package-lock.json | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 |
frontend/package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
frontend/src/lib/backend.ts:59 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-23wf-92cp-8pcj |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6878, GHSA-23wf-92cp-8pcj | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-246p-cpwv-v3jq |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6872, GHSA-246p-cpwv-v3jq | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-2ffq-g2xg-c22p |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6879, GHSA-2ffq-g2xg-c22p | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-3pmx-cf9f-34xr |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6881, GHSA-3pmx-cf9f-34xr | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-99jh-6h7p-pp36 |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6875, GHSA-99jh-6h7p-pp36 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-h9g5-28mm-hx3g |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6876, GHSA-h9g5-28mm-hx3g | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-r7w9-592q-9vg4 |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6877, GHSA-r7w9-592q-9vg4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-v753-g4cw-jm48 |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6883, GHSA-v753-g4cw-jm48 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-xwq5-6cqp-vx96 |
go.mod | github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6885, GHSA-xwq5-6cqp-vx96 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GO-2026-5932 |
go.mod | golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5932 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GO-2026-6860 |
go.mod | golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6860 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GO-2026-6866 |
go.mod | golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6866 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/flash_windows.go:43 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/flash_windows.go:44 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/flash_windows.go:63 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:28 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:29 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:36 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block |
internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:37 | Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used |
internal/node/predict.go:6 | Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used |
internal/portmap/portmap.go:11 | Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used |
internal/server/server.go:17 | Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:1 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:10 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:10 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:11 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:13 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:15 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:15 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:22 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:24 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:4 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:8 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity |
mobile/android-probe/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:14 | The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/bed.ts:25 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
web/src/i18n.ts:31 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:139 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:215 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:45 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:62 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:86 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:87 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
web/src/main.ts:90 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:11 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:11 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:24 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:24 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:4 | `r` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:4 | `s` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
web/src/main.ts:217 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
web/src/main.ts:217 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
web/src/main.ts:218 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
web/src/main.ts:218 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
web/src/main.ts:91 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
web/src/main.ts:91 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
internal/update/update_test.go:94 | Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| info | zizmor/superfluous-actions |
.github/workflows/build.yml:143 | action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 28 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 39 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 22 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 52 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 1 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 3e4eee2130b4 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 77 | 56 |
| 2026-11-14 | 3e4eee2130b4 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 77 | 56 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer
- Commit:
3e4eee2130b45864e0372d2efa04041268f9a593 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:02+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 100 | explicit | 85% | 100% |
| Code quality | 77 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 56 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 59 | 35,358 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 28,032 of 28,032.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
- Stylometry index: 0.04 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 2). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 30,523 | 100% |
| 2026-11 | 4,841 | 100% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3e4eee2130b4)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (03e49d472b14)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ea53be0282bf)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f5927fba6d51)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9605229d4495)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f925fcd8e76a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7f69f0c92be1)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (162cd06f6703)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (06e13bc53552)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c91136597b57)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e998e0b5e7dc)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (822955fd9720)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (78f2a422a331)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3878a3548ab8)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ebed96995b1b)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.22, CI runs tests; 10% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 75 |
| Duplication | 88 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 85 |
| Tests and CI | 76 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 60 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 2,131; mean complexity 2.7, 90th percentile 6; 20 complex and 4 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 2.2% of 20,651 compared
- Tests: 6,090 test lines for 28,032 source lines (ratio 0.22); CI test commands: go test; 71% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- runCommand in cmd/tpcli/main.go: complexity 55, 193 lines
- handleIncoming in internal/node/node.go: complexity 31, 109 lines
- connect in internal/node/connect.go: complexity 30, 102 lines
- start in cmd/server/links.go: complexity 28, 106 lines
- Send in internal/transfer/sender.go: complexity 28, 98 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 22 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 32 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 97 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 79 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 50 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 0 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 22 in 8 packages (critical 1, high 5, medium 13, low 0)
-
Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| critical | osv/GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6839, GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8 |
go.mod |
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command: Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
internal/desktopapp/update_darwin.go:71 |
| high | opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command: Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] |
internal/desktopapp/update_windows.go:65 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket: Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:3 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a ye.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket: Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] |
web/src/link.ts:88 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
web/src/main.ts:13 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a view.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
web/src/main.ts:13 |
| high | osv/GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq |
frontend/package-lock.json |
| high | osv/GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6293, GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq |
go.mod |
| high | osv/GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6840, GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv |
go.mod |
| high | osv/GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6842, GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc |
go.mod |
| high | osv/GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6873, GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4 |
go.mod |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:25 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:31 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:32 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:41 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:42 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:45 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:49 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:58 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:59 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:62 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:66 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v0.2.6 ships TropicalPeer-0.2.6.apk (5 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.2.6 ships TropicalPeer-0.2.6.dmg (0 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.2.6 ships TropicalPeer-0.2.6.exe (0 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.2.6 ships tropicalpeer-server-windows-amd64.exe (0 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v0.2.6 ships tropicalpeer-server-windows-arm64.exe (0 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 28,032; test lines: 6,090
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Go | 23,681 |
| Svelte | 4,057 |
| TypeScript | 3,158 |
| Java | 1,665 |
| JavaScript | 606 |
| Kotlin | 492 |
| PowerShell | 208 |
| Shell | 189 |
| Objective-C | 66 |