RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer

Peer-to-peer file transfer for Windows, macOS and Android.

  • View repository ↗
  • Go
  • ★ 0
  • commit 3e4eee2130b4
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

77/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

56/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share100%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share100%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace4
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.04

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code5935,3582026-10-102026-11-10

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-1030,523 · 100% AI
  2. 2026-114,841 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 28,032 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality1.00——
Security1.78——

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok26 items
attributed_commit_share
95.2%
attributed_commits
59
attributed_loc
35,358
attributed_loc_share
100.0%
commits
62
effective_loc
35,364
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok4 items
excluded_import_loc
18,209
flagged_loc
9,862
flagged_loc_share
57.5%
flagged_units
4
max_loc_per_hour
1,266.85
measured_loc
17,155
median_loc_per_hour
359.06
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
20
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
30,404.40
releases
16
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
2
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
2
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0.04
lines_scanned
28,032
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0.07
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
28,032
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
195
other_lines
0
quality:ai_findings
28
quality:ai_per_kloc
1.00
quality:other_findings
0
security:ai_findings
50
security:ai_per_kloc
1.78
security:other_findings
0

Code quality

77 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.22, CI runs tests; 10% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

How the score is built

  • Complexity75
  • Duplication88
  • Lint and smells85
  • Tests and CI76
  • Documentation65
  • Type safety60
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
20
function_nloc
15,960
functions
2,131
long_functions
4
many_param_functions
5
mean_ccn
2.73
p90_ccn
6
risky_nloc_share
9.5%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
20,651
duplicated_lines
457
duplicated_share
2.2%
files
195
Lintok
category:best-practice
1
category:correctness
27
findings
28
scanned_lines
27,758
weighted_findings
17.50
Tests and CIok2 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/build.yml .github/workflows/build.yml
  • CI runs tests (go test)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
yes
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
35
cochange_share
71.4%
source_lines
28,032
test_lines
6,090
test_ratio
0.22
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
196
Type safetyok1 item
  • TypeScript strict type checking: frontend/tsconfig.node.json frontend/tsconfig.node.json
check:low_escape_density
no
check:strict_config
yes
escapes
45
escapes_per_kloc
14.25

Security

56 weak

Security posture is weak: 22 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 32 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)79
  • Vulnerable dependencies50
  • CI workflows0
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
16
declared
16
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
1
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
52
findings_high
8
findings_low
0
findings_medium
44
parse_errors
1
scanned_lines
27,758
weighted_findings
18.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
41
vulnerabilities
22
vulnerable_packages
8
vulns_critical
1
vulns_high
5
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
13
vulns_unknown
3
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
39
findings_high
32
findings_low
1
findings_medium
6
penalty
315.60
workflows
1
Security postureok1 item
  • frontend/wailsjs/runtime/package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) frontend/wailsjs/runtime/package.json
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
no
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
1.6%
unpinned_manifests
1
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
50
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

1 critical45 high80 medium15 low1 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
critical osv/GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8 go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6839, GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:117 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:127 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:128 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:128 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:131 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:143 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/build.yml:25 overly broad permissions [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:31 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:32 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:32 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:41 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:42 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:42 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:45 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:45 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:49 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:58 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:59 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:59 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:62 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:62 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:66 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:75 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:76 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:76 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:80 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:89 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:90 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:90 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/build.yml:93 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:93 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:96 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high osv/GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq frontend/package-lock.json [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4 go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6873, GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6840, GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6842, GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high osv/GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6293, GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command internal/desktopapp/update_darwin.go:71 Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command internal/desktopapp/update_windows.go:65 Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:3 Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 User controlled data in a `ye.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket web/src/link.ts:88 Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method web/src/main.ts:13 User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml web/src/main.ts:13 User controlled data in a `view.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission cmd/server/dnscert.go:81 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/desktopapp/notify_windows.go:28 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/desktopapp/update.go:75 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/identity/identity.go:74 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/node/lock.go:20 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.best-practice.hidden-goroutine internal/node/predict.go:138 Detected a hidden goroutine. Function invocations are expected to synchronous, and this function will execute asynchronously because all it does is call a goroutine. Instead, remove the internal goroutine and call the function using 'go'. Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/node/settings.go:56 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/peers/store.go:302 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/peers/store.go:315 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/transfer/receiver.go:295 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/transfer/receiver.go:483 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/transfer/receiver.go:489 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/transfer/receiver.go:640 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium opengrep/go.lang.correctness.permissions.incorrect-default-permission internal/update/update.go:129 Detected file permissions that are set to more than `0600` (user/owner can read and write). Setting file permissions to higher than `0600` is most likely unnecessary and violates the principle of least privilege. Instead, set... Lint
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:127 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:31 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:41 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:58 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:75 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:89 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity frontend/android/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:13 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium osv/GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 frontend/package-lock.json [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-8g5g-mxqh-grgj frontend/package-lock.json [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-8g5g-mxqh-grgj; also in web/package-lock.json Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 frontend/package-lock.json [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 frontend/package-lock.json [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method frontend/src/lib/backend.ts:59 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium osv/GHSA-23wf-92cp-8pcj go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6878, GHSA-23wf-92cp-8pcj Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-246p-cpwv-v3jq go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6872, GHSA-246p-cpwv-v3jq Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-2ffq-g2xg-c22p go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6879, GHSA-2ffq-g2xg-c22p Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-3pmx-cf9f-34xr go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6881, GHSA-3pmx-cf9f-34xr Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-99jh-6h7p-pp36 go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6875, GHSA-99jh-6h7p-pp36 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-h9g5-28mm-hx3g go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6876, GHSA-h9g5-28mm-hx3g Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-r7w9-592q-9vg4 go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6877, GHSA-r7w9-592q-9vg4 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-v753-g4cw-jm48 go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6883, GHSA-v753-g4cw-jm48 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-xwq5-6cqp-vx96 go.mod github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6885, GHSA-xwq5-6cqp-vx96 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-5932 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-5932 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6860 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6860 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GO-2026-6866 go.mod golang.org/x/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6866 Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/flash_windows.go:43 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/flash_windows.go:44 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/flash_windows.go:63 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:28 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:29 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:36 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.use-of-unsafe-block internal/desktop/tray_darwin.go:37 Using the unsafe package in Go gives you low-level memory management and many of the strengths of the C language, but also steps around the type safety of Go and can lead to buffer overflows and possible arbitrary code execution by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used internal/node/predict.go:6 Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used internal/portmap/portmap.go:11 Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.crypto.math-random-used internal/server/server.go:17 Do not use `math/rand`. Use `crypto/rand` instead. [confidence medium] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:1 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:10 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:10 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:11 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:13 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:15 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:15 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:22 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:24 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:4 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:8 User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity mobile/android-probe/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:14 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/bed.ts:25 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method web/src/i18n.ts:31 Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:139 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:215 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:45 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:62 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:86 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:87 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string web/src/main.ts:90 This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:11 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:11 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:24 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:24 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:25 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:4 `r` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.useless-assignment internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:4 `s` is assigned twice; the first assignment is useless Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator web/src/main.ts:217 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator web/src/main.ts:217 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator web/src/main.ts:218 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator web/src/main.ts:218 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator web/src/main.ts:91 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator web/src/main.ts:91 This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? Lint
low gitleaks/generic-api-key internal/update/update_test.go:94 Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) Secrets (gitleaks)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/build.yml:143 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41428
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.039
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.122
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41452
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-143e4eee2130b4prov-5+qual-2+sec-2100%7756
2026-11-143e4eee2130b4prov-4+qual-2+sec-2100%7756

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/TropicalFan344/TropicalPeer/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 100 explicit 85% 100%
Code quality 77 adequate 90% 100%
Security 56 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 59 35,358

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 28,032 of 28,032.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 0.04 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 2). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-10 30,523 100%
2026-11 4,841 100%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3e4eee2130b4)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (03e49d472b14)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ea53be0282bf)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f5927fba6d51)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9605229d4495)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f925fcd8e76a)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7f69f0c92be1)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (162cd06f6703)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (06e13bc53552)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c91136597b57)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e998e0b5e7dc)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (822955fd9720)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (78f2a422a331)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3878a3548ab8)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ebed96995b1b)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.22, CI runs tests; 10% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 75
Duplication 88
Code smells (Opengrep) 85
Tests and CI 76
Documentation 65
Type safety 60
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 2,131; mean complexity 2.7, 90th percentile 6; 20 complex and 4 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 2.2% of 20,651 compared
  • Tests: 6,090 test lines for 28,032 source lines (ratio 0.22); CI test commands: go test; 71% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 22 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies; 8 high-severity SAST findings; 32 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 79
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 50
CI workflows (zizmor) 0
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 22 in 8 packages (critical 1, high 5, medium 13, low 0)

  • Posture checks passed: none; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
critical osv/GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6839, GHSA-cxf3-9h37-7rr8 go.mod
high opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command: Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] internal/desktopapp/update_darwin.go:71
high opengrep/go.lang.security.audit.dangerous-exec-command: Detected non-static command inside Command. Audit the input to 'exec.Command'. If unverified user data can reach this call site, this is a code injection vulnerability. A malicious actor can inject a malicious script to execute arbitrary code. [confidence low] internal/desktopapp/update_windows.go:65
high opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket: Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:3
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a ye.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] internal/server/webdist/assets/index-BENn4tZh.js:7
high opengrep/javascript.lang.security.detect-insecure-websocket: Insecure WebSocket Detected. WebSocket Secure (wss) should be used for all WebSocket connections. [confidence low] web/src/link.ts:88
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] web/src/main.ts:13
high opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a view.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] web/src/main.ts:13
high osv/GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq frontend/package-lock.json
high osv/GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6293, GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq go.mod
high osv/GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6840, GHSA-f48p-c9v4-h7xv go.mod
high osv/GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6842, GHSA-h7wr-284f-5qvc go.mod
high osv/GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4: github.com/labstack/echo/[email protected] (Go) is affected by GO-2026-6873, GHSA-375p-5qhx-8wq4 go.mod
high zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:25
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:31
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:32
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:41
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:42
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:45
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:49
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:58
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:59
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:62
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:66

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 28,032; test lines: 6,090
Language Lines
Go 23,681
Svelte 4,057
TypeScript 3,158
Java 1,665
JavaScript 606
Kotlin 492
PowerShell 208
Shell 189
Objective-C 66