RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker

Andreaitemmaker: Vibe coded item plugin aiming to replace premium plugins by being completely free and open source

  • View repository ↗
  • Java
  • ★ 1
  • commit d88bdb078ded
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
44%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

72/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

91/100

strong

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-088,522 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-096,804 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
14
effective_loc
15,326
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
11,880
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
451.69
measured_loc
3,446
median_loc_per_hour
229.71
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
3
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
3,717.80
releases
2
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
12,325
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

72 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.21, no CI test run detected; 5% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity87
  • Duplication84
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI40
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok7 items
complex_functions
7
function_nloc
7,192
functions
705
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
7
mean_ccn
3.01
p90_ccn
7
risky_nloc_share
4.6%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
7,832
duplicated_lines
231
duplicated_share
2.9%
files
95
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
12,325
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
6
cochange_share
100.0%
source_lines
12,325
test_lines
2,550
test_ratio
0.21
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
325
Type safetyskipped

Security

91 strong

Security posture is strong: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)97
  • Vulnerable dependencies100
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture40
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
1
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
12,325
weighted_findings
1
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
0
vulnerabilities
0
vulnerable_packages
0
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
0
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
0
vulns_unknown
0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
  • Security policy: docs/security.md docs/security.md
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
yes
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
28.6%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok3 items
binary_assets
3
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

1 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.crypto.use-of-sha1 src/main/java/com/andreaitemmaker/pack/ResourcePackManagerImpl.java:113 Detected SHA1 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. SHA1 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Instead, use PBKDF2 for password hashing or SHA256 or SHA512 for other hash function... Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.10
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14d88bdb078dedprov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7291
2026-11-14d88bdb078dedprov-4+qual-2+sec-20%7291

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Therecalloftheonion/Andreaitemmaker/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 44% 100%
Code quality 72 adequate 90% 100%
Security 91 strong 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-08 8,522 0%
2026-09 6,804 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.21, no CI test run detected; 5% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 87
Duplication 84
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 40
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 705; mean complexity 3.0, 90th percentile 7; 7 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 2.9% of 7,832 compared
  • Tests: 2,550 test lines for 12,325 source lines (ratio 0.21); CI test commands: none detected; 100% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is strong: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 97
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 100
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 40
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: security policy, lockfiles; missing: dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.crypto.use-of-sha1: Detected SHA1 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. SHA1 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Instead, use PBKDF2 for password hashing or SHA256 or SHA512 for other hash function applications. [confidence high] src/main/java/com/andreaitemmaker/pack/ResourcePackManagerImpl.java:113

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 12,325; test lines: 2,550
Language Lines
Java 14,875