RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Tencent/PhoenixGo

Go AI program which implements the AlphaGo Zero paper

  • View repository ↗
  • C++
  • ★ 2,918
  • commit fbf67f9aec42
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
60%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

49/100

poor

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

78/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2018-056,777 · 0% AI
  2. 2018-06102 · 0% AI
  3. 2018-0849 · 0% AI
  4. 2018-090 · 0% AI
  5. 2018-12170 · 0% AI
  6. 2019-02481 · 0% AI
  7. 2019-030 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
80
effective_loc
7,579
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
6,565
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
49.03
measured_loc
1,014
median_loc_per_hour
21.39
pr_timed_units
1
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
1,014
work_units
19
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
39.80
releases
4
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
7,090
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

49 poor

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 14% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity65
  • Duplication53
  • Lint and smells75
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation65
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok7 items
complex_functions
7
function_nloc
4,211
functions
337
long_functions
2
many_param_functions
1
mean_ccn
3.10
p90_ccn
8
risky_nloc_share
14.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok7 items
compared_lines
4,783
duplicated_lines
510
duplicated_share
10.7%
files
39
Lintok
category:best-practice
6
category:correctness
6
findings
12
scanned_lines
7,090
weighted_findings
8.25
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
29
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
7,090
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE.TXT LICENSE.TXT
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
211
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

78 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)90
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
5
findings_high
2
findings_low
0
findings_medium
3
parse_errors
2
scanned_lines
7,090
weighted_findings
2.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
21.2%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok6 items
binary_assets
7
signals
2
suspicious
0

Findings

2 high10 medium5 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit configure.py:143 Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit configure.py:147 Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding configure.py:124 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding configure.py:127 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding configure.py:132 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list configure.py:170 Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding configure.py:249 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding configure.py:257 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.unspecified-open-encoding configure.py:756 Missing 'encoding' parameter. 'open()' uses device locale encodings by default, corrupting files with special characters. Specify the encoding to ensure cross-platform support when opening files in text mode (e.g. encoding="utf-8"). Lint
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset common/go_state.h:119 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset common/go_state.h:120 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset common/go_state.h:121 When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command scripts/build_tensorrt_model.sh:18 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command scripts/build_tensorrt_model.sh:24 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command scripts/build_tensorrt_model.sh:26 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command scripts/build_tensorrt_model.sh:6 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command scripts/start.sh:3 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41412
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4145
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14fbf67f9aec42prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%4978
2026-11-14fbf67f9aec42prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%4978

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/Tencent/PhoenixGo
  • Commit: fbf67f9aec42531bff9569c44b85eb4c3f37b7be
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 60% 100%
Code quality 49 poor 90% 100%
Security 78 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2018-05 6,777 0%
2018-06 102 0%
2018-08 49 0%
2018-12 170 0%
2019-02 481 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 14% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 65
Duplication 53
Code smells (Opengrep) 75
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 65
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 337; mean complexity 3.1, 90th percentile 8; 7 complex and 2 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 10.7% of 4,783 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 7,090 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 90
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] configure.py:143
high opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] configure.py:147
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] common/go_state.h:119
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] common/go_state.h:120
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset: When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While memset() is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information behind due to compiler optimizations or other factors. To avoi [confidence low] common/go_state.h:121

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 7,090; test lines: 0
Language Lines
C++ 3,722
Python 1,747
C 1,540
Shell 81