Leaderboard github.com

SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10

Port of Hostile Neural Networks to Minecraft Forge 1.7.10

View repository ↗
Java
★ 3
commit de40f5958b5f
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

unreviewed-ai-risk

AI provenance

51%

explicit

Confidence: 77%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

56/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

79/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

51% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 51% of first-party code added; an estimated 51% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share51%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share51%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.17

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	23	9,897	2026-01-22	2026-07-14

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-0114,197 · 32% AI
2026-023,899 · 100% AI
2026-04161 · 100% AI
2026-071,298 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 6,735 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 5,148 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.00	—
Security	0.00	0.00	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok24 items

attributed_commit_share: 82.1%
attributed_commits: 23
attributed_loc: 9,897
attributed_loc_share: 50.6%
commits: 28
effective_loc: 19,555
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 8,772
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 385.61
measured_loc: 10,783
median_loc_per_hour: 99.62
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 23

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 674.60
releases: 4

Coding styleok2 items

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 2
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 1
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.17
lines_scanned: 11,883
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0.17
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 6,735
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 53
other_lines: 5,148
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 0
quality:other_per_kloc: 0
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 0
security:other_per_kloc: 0

Code quality

56 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity58
Duplication69
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI15
Documentation65
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 10
function_nloc: 6,715
functions: 609
long_functions: 7
many_param_functions: 3
mean_ccn: 2.91
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 18.4%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 7,414
duplicated_lines: 454
duplicated_share: 6.1%
files: 53

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 11,883
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok2 items

CI config: .github/workflows/build-and-test.yml .github/workflows/build-and-test.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/release-tags.yml .github/workflows/release-tags.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 2
cochange_commits: 28
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 11,883
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 23

Type safetyskipped

Security

79 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflows56
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 11,883
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 5
findings_high: 2
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 3
penalty: 34.40
workflows: 2

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 100.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok5 items

binary_assets: 15
signals: 1
suspicious: 0

Findings

2 high3 medium

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml:12	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release-tags.yml:13	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml:11	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/secrets-inherit`	.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml:12	secrets unconditionally inherited by called workflow [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/secrets-inherit`	.github/workflows/release-tags.yml:13	secrets unconditionally inherited by called workflow [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	5
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`de40f5958b5f`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	51%	56	79
2026-11-14	`de40f5958b5f`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	51%	56	79

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/SwingURM/Hostile-Neural-Networks-1.7.10
Commit: de40f5958b5ff8d3157189d14acb1a036e9989ca
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	51	explicit	77%	100%
Code quality	56	weak	90%	100%
Security	79	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 51% of first-party code added; an estimated 51% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 50.6%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 50.6%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	23	9,897

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 6,735 of 11,883.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	0.0	0.0	n/a
Security	0.0	0.0	n/a

Stylometry index: 0.17 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 2, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-01	14,197	32%
2026-02	3,899	100%
2026-04	161	100%
2026-07	1,298	100%

Evidence

Claude Code: author email [email protected] (de40f5958b5f)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (4ba86b44ede3)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (6d502e35f294)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (8f64ac2d6192)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (3855470fe3dd)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (3eb62fdda8a8)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (45fb3f7ac665)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (57a709aab9cd)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (54a24265a070)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (a83a3e338577)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (fbf02a29339e)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (052e93891d33)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (adcb0bf909d7)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (5a2d620be2c3)
Claude Code: author email [email protected] (9bdf1fdef921)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	58
Duplication	69
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	15
Documentation	65
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 609; mean complexity 2.9, 90th percentile 6; 10 complex and 7 long functions
Duplicated lines: 6.1% of 7,414 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 11,883 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	56
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml:12
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release-tags.yml:13
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml:11
medium	`zizmor/secrets-inherit`: secrets unconditionally inherited by called workflow [confidence high]	.github/workflows/build-and-test.yml:12
medium	`zizmor/secrets-inherit`: secrets unconditionally inherited by called workflow [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release-tags.yml:13

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

binary-release-asset: release v0.0.1-alpha5 ships hostilenetworks-v0.0.1-alpha5-dev.jar (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v0.0.1-alpha5 ships hostilenetworks-v0.0.1-alpha5-sources.jar (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v0.0.1-alpha5 ships hostilenetworks-v0.0.1-alpha5.jar (1 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v0.0.1-alpha4 ships hostilenetworks-v0.0.1-alpha4-dev.jar (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v0.0.1-alpha4 ships hostilenetworks-v0.0.1-alpha4-sources.jar (0 downloads)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

Source lines: 11,883; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
Java	11,858
Kotlin	25