Leaderboard github.com
Real-Serious-Games/C-Sharp-Promise
Promises library for C# for management of asynchronous operations.
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
68/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
69/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2014-10401 · 0% AI
- 2014-11665 · 0% AI
- 2014-1237 · 0% AI
- 2015-012,431 · 0% AI
- 2015-022,549 · 0% AI
- 2015-03539 · 0% AI
- 2015-05625 · 0% AI
- 2015-09195 · 0% AI
- 2015-10105 · 0% AI
- 2016-021,660 · 0% AI
- 2016-032 · 0% AI
- 2016-040 · 0% AI
- 2016-060 · 0% AI
- 2017-02105 · 0% AI
- 2017-032,617 · 0% AI
- 2017-1036 · 0% AI
- 2017-11288 · 0% AI
- 2017-125 · 0% AI
- 2018-01936 · 0% AI
- 2018-021,194 · 0% AI
- 2018-045 · 0% AI
- 2018-060 · 0% AI
- 2018-0761 · 0% AI
- 2018-110 · 0% AI
- 2019-05136 · 0% AI
- 2019-06234 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 228
- effective_loc
- 14,826
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 2,371.40
- measured_loc
- 14,826
- median_loc_per_hour
- 65.60
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 1,907
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 1
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 14,826
- work_units
- 83
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 3,906.90
- releases
- 22
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 4,549
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
68 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.78, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 38% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication10
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI70
- Documentation80
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process25
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 2,285
- functions
- 173
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.80
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: Examples/Example1/Program.cs:25 and Examples/Example3/Program.cs:48
- 6+ duplicated lines: Examples/Example1/Program.cs:29 and Examples/Example2/Program.cs:28
- 6+ duplicated lines: Examples/Example1/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs:1 and Examples/Example2/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: Examples/Example3/Program.cs:16 and Examples/Example4/Program.cs:16
- 6+ duplicated lines: Examples/Example4/Program.cs:14 and Examples/Example5/Program.cs:13
- 6+ duplicated lines: Tests/A+ Spec/2.2.cs:50 and Tests/A+ Spec/2.2.cs:77
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/Promise.cs:39 and src/Promise_NonGeneric.cs:39
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/Promise.cs:116 and src/Promise.cs:944
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/PromiseHelpers.cs:21 and src/PromiseHelpers.cs:42
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/Promise_NonGeneric.cs:113 and src/Promise_NonGeneric.cs:1052
- compared_lines
- 2,736
- duplicated_lines
- 1,032
- duplicated_share
- 37.7%
- files
- 22
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 4,549
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok1 item
- CI config: .travis.yml
.travis.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 144
- cochange_share
- 32.6%
- source_lines
- 4,549
- test_lines
- 3,558
- test_ratio
- 0.78
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CONTRIBUTING.md
CONTRIBUTING.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 504
Type safetyskipped
Security
69 weak
Security posture is weak: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard0
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok8 items
- Scorecard Code-Review: 5/10 (Found 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 0/10 (binaries present in source code)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 1.50
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 4,549
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 2.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
No line-level findings.
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 824b714b47e4 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 68 | 69 |
| 2026-11-14 | 824b714b47e4 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 68 | 69 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Real-Serious-Games/C-Sharp-Promise
- Commit:
824b714b47e40239aa6595a3288460c461539345 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 68 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 69 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-03 | 2 | 0% |
| 2017-02 | 105 | 0% |
| 2017-03 | 2,617 | 0% |
| 2017-10 | 36 | 0% |
| 2017-11 | 288 | 0% |
| 2017-12 | 5 | 0% |
| 2018-01 | 936 | 0% |
| 2018-02 | 1,194 | 0% |
| 2018-04 | 5 | 0% |
| 2018-07 | 61 | 0% |
| 2019-05 | 136 | 0% |
| 2019-06 | 234 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.78, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 38% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 10 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 70 |
| Documentation | 80 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 25 |
- Functions: 173; mean complexity 1.8, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 37.7% of 2,736 compared
- Tests: 3,558 test lines for 4,549 source lines (ratio 0.78); CI test commands: none detected; 33% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: changelog
Security
Security posture is weak: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 0 |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 1.5/10 (published 2026-11-09)
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 4,549; test lines: 3,558
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C# | 8,107 |