Leaderboard github.com
Ramotion/reel-search
:octocat: 🔍 RAMReel is a UI controller that allows you to choose options from a list. Swift UI library made by @Ramotion
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
64/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
71/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2015-042,652 · 0% AI
- 2015-0510 · 0% AI
- 2015-0616 · 0% AI
- 2015-07100 · 0% AI
- 2015-0823 · 0% AI
- 2015-09133 · 0% AI
- 2015-10192 · 0% AI
- 2015-1264 · 0% AI
- 2016-01276 · 0% AI
- 2016-0268 · 0% AI
- 2016-030 · 0% AI
- 2016-049 · 0% AI
- 2016-0599 · 0% AI
- 2016-060 · 0% AI
- 2016-070 · 0% AI
- 2016-080 · 0% AI
- 2016-10267 · 0% AI
- 2017-010 · 0% AI
- 2017-020 · 0% AI
- 2017-030 · 0% AI
- 2017-04340 · 0% AI
- 2017-060 · 0% AI
- 2017-070 · 0% AI
- 2017-1115 · 0% AI
- 2018-0110 · 0% AI
- 2018-020 · 0% AI
- 2018-030 · 0% AI
- 2018-040 · 0% AI
- 2018-050 · 0% AI
- 2018-060 · 0% AI
- 2018-0850 · 0% AI
- 2018-0930 · 0% AI
- 2018-120 · 0% AI
- 2019-040 · 0% AI
- 2019-100 · 0% AI
- 2019-1139 · 0% AI
- 2020-0114 · 0% AI
- 2020-040 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 171
- effective_loc
- 4,407
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 131.75
- measured_loc
- 4,407
- median_loc_per_hour
- 53.00
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 4,407
- work_units
- 63
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 795.70
- releases
- 43
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 2,137
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
64 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication75
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI15
- Documentation100
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process5
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 906
- functions
- 107
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.99
- p90_ccn
- 4
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 1,234
- duplicated_lines
- 60
- duplicated_share
- 4.9%
- files
- 16
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 2,137
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok1 item
- CI config: .travis.yml
.travis.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 71
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 2,137
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok4 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CONTRIBUTING.md
CONTRIBUTING.md - CHANGELOG.md
CHANGELOG.md
- check:changelog
- yes
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 104
Type safetyskipped
Security
71 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)92
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard25
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok9 items
- Scorecard Code-Review: 1/10 (Found 4/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1)
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 10/10 (no binaries found in the repo)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 2.10
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 2
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- parse_errors
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 2,137
- weighted_findings
- 0.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 9.4%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
2 medium
2 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
docs/docsets/RAMReel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/js/jazzy.js:14 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector |
docs/js/jazzy.js:14 | User controlled data in a `$(...)` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 2 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | fde22643b50c | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 64 | 71 |
| 2026-11-14 | fde22643b50c | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 64 | 71 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Ramotion/reel-search
- Commit:
fde22643b50c0b4235c3ada2b82c904f0a61d48c - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 64 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 71 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-01 | 276 | 0% |
| 2016-02 | 68 | 0% |
| 2016-04 | 9 | 0% |
| 2016-05 | 99 | 0% |
| 2016-10 | 267 | 0% |
| 2017-04 | 340 | 0% |
| 2017-11 | 15 | 0% |
| 2018-01 | 10 | 0% |
| 2018-08 | 50 | 0% |
| 2018-09 | 30 | 0% |
| 2019-11 | 39 | 0% |
| 2020-01 | 14 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 75 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 15 |
| Documentation | 100 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 5 |
- Functions: 107; mean complexity 2.0, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 4.9% of 1,234 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 2,137 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: none
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 92 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 25 |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.1/10 (published 2026-11-09)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector: User controlled data in a $(...) is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
docs/docsets/RAMReel.docset/Contents/Resources/Documents/js/jazzy.js:14 |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.jquery-insecure-selector: User controlled data in a $(...) is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
docs/js/jazzy.js:14 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 2,137; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Swift | 2,038 |
| JavaScript | 80 |
| C | 19 |