Leaderboard github.com
Radioo/573Renderer
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
82/100
strong
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
70/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 1 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts45%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files1
- Work sessions at AI pace27
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 1 | 2 | 2026-07-08 | 2026-07-08 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-0729,823 · 0% AI
- 2026-0875,343 · 0% AI
- 2026-0985,162 · 0% AI
- 2026-101,057 · 0% AI
- 2026-11183 · 0% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 0 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 109,469 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | — | 0.05 | — |
| Security | — | 0.12 | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok2 items
- Claude Code: 1 attributed commits, 2 lines added
- Claude Code: on merged branch (7d32ad52bc)
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.5%
- attributed_commits
- 1
- attributed_loc
- 2
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 196
- effective_loc
- 191,568
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok1 item
- artifacts
- 1
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-07-07
- tools_configured
- 1
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok15 items
- 3,275 lines of first-party code in ~1.2h (2,804 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 1,777 lines of first-party code in ~1.0h (1,699 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 7,646 lines of first-party code in ~4.8h (1,577 lines/hour, 12 commit session)
- 2,483 lines of first-party code in ~1.6h (1,540 lines/hour, 2 commit session)
- 3,561 lines of first-party code in ~2.3h (1,529 lines/hour, 3 commit session)
- 2,351 lines of first-party code in ~1.5h (1,525 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 2,928 lines of first-party code in ~2.2h (1,333 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 3,821 lines of first-party code in ~3.2h (1,196 lines/hour, 9 commit session)
- 2,183 lines of first-party code in ~2.2h (989 lines/hour, 4 commit session)
- 1,893 lines of first-party code in ~1.9h (986 lines/hour, 4 commit session)
- 3,837 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (959 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 2,194 lines of first-party code in ~2.3h (942 lines/hour, 6 commit session)
- 3,621 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (905 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 3,501 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (875 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 2,818 lines of first-party code in ~3.4h (835 lines/hour, 3 commit session)
- excluded_import_loc
- 88,461
- flagged_loc
- 86,398
- flagged_loc_share
- 83.8%
- flagged_units
- 27
- max_loc_per_hour
- 2,804.47
- measured_loc
- 103,107
- median_loc_per_hour
- 483.47
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 67
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 933.30
- releases
- 4
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 109,469
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 0
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 782
- other_lines
- 109,469
- quality:ai_findings
- 0
- quality:other_findings
- 5
- quality:other_per_kloc
- 0.05
- security:ai_findings
- 0
- security:other_findings
- 13
- security:other_per_kloc
- 0.12
Code quality
82 strong
Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.52, CI runs tests; 9% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.
How the score is built
- Complexity76
- Duplication83
- Lint and smells98
- Tests and CI100
- Documentation40
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- Editor::Window::ShowTimelineMenu in editor/src/editor_timeline_menu.cpp: complexity 74, 184 lines
- main in editor/src/editor_shot_main.cpp: complexity 73, 214 lines
- Editor::Window::ShowKeyMenu in editor/src/editor_keys.cpp: complexity 47, 136 lines
- Editor::Icons::Named in editor/src/editor_icons.cpp: complexity 39, 81 lines
- AfpScript::PushOperandSize in src/formats/afp_script.cpp: complexity 36, 47 lines
- Editor::Window::ShowPackageMenu in editor/src/editor_window.cpp: complexity 32, 87 lines
- Loop::CliAutopilot::Tick in src/loop/cli_autopilot.cpp: complexity 32, 44 lines
- Preset::Doc::ReadParam in src/preset/doc/preset_json.cpp: complexity 27, 54 lines
- main in tools/local/render_regression.py: complexity 27, 77 lines
- Editor::ScriptLexer::StylesOf in editor/src/editor_script_lexer.cpp: complexity 26, 56 lines
- complex_functions
- 63
- function_nloc
- 69,960
- functions
- 5,151
- long_functions
- 19
- many_param_functions
- 27
- mean_ccn
- 4.11
- p90_ccn
- 9
- risky_nloc_share
- 9.1%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: editor/src/editor_depth_menu.cpp:88 and editor/src/editor_depth_menu.cpp:106
- 6+ duplicated lines: editor/src/editor_ease_editor.h:31 and editor/src/editor_graph.h:43
- 6+ duplicated lines: editor/src/editor_project.cpp:86 and editor/src/editor_project.cpp:118
- 6+ duplicated lines: editor/src/editor_selection_bar.cpp:87 and editor/src/editor_timeline_bar.cpp:74
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/afp_anim.cpp:424 and src/afp_anim.cpp:453
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/arc_extract.cpp:131 and src/customize_extract.cpp:238
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/arc_extract.h:14 and src/customize_extract.h:17
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/backend/afp_profiles.cpp:9 and src/backend/afp_profiles.cpp:30
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/document/anchor_edit.cpp:42 and src/document/span_split.cpp:53
- 6+ duplicated lines: src/document/animation_entries.cpp:416 and src/document/animation_entries.cpp:458
- compared_lines
- 75,986
- duplicated_lines
- 2,325
- duplicated_share
- 3.1%
- files
- 782
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 1
- category:correctness
- 4
- findings
- 5
- scanned_lines
- 109,469
- weighted_findings
- 7
Tests and CIok4 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/build-renderer.yml
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml - CI config: .github/workflows/quality-gates.yml
.github/workflows/quality-gates.yml - CI runs tests (pytest, ctest)
- CI runs linters (ruff)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- yes
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- yes
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 2
- cochange_commits
- 181
- cochange_share
- 90.6%
- source_lines
- 109,469
- test_lines
- 57,171
- test_ratio
- 0.52
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 80
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
70 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 1 known vulnerabilities in 1 dependencies; 12 high-severity SAST findings; 39 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)96
- Vulnerable dependencies95
- CI workflows0
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesok
- checked
- 5
- declared
- 5
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 13
- findings_high
- 12
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 22
- scanned_lines
- 109,469
- weighted_findings
- 11.35
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 3
- vulnerabilities
- 1
- vulnerable_packages
- 1
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 0
- vulns_medium
- 1
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 45
- findings_high
- 39
- findings_low
- 6
- findings_medium
- 0
- penalty
- 393.90
- workflows
- 2
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok5 items
- release v1.3.0 ships 573Editor.zip (2 downloads)
- release v1.3.0 ships 573Renderer.zip (2 downloads)
- release v1.2.0 ships 573Renderer.exe (52 downloads)
- release v1.2.0 ships 573Renderer32.exe (7 downloads)
- release v1.1.0 ships 573Renderer.exe (43 downloads)
- binary_assets
- 8
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
52 high6 medium5 low1 info
64 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.arbitrary-sleep |
tools/ci/check_editor_starts.py:24 | time.sleep() call; did you mean to leave this in? | Lint |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:111 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:111 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:16 | overly broad permissions [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:167 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:176 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:187 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:193 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:204 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:224 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:236 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:242 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:242 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:252 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:252 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:277 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:284 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:284 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:296 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:315 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:327 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:333 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:333 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:343 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:343 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:374 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:377 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:383 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:389 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:395 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:395 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:404 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:56 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:69 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:75 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:75 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/cache-poisoning |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:92 | runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:92 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/quality-gates.yml:23 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/quality-gates.yml:26 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/check_editor_starts.py:17 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/preset_dump.py:41 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/run_format.py:32 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/run_format.py:50 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:171 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:171 | Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:31 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:90 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:90 | Detected subprocess function 'check_output' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/local/preset_sweep.py:49 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/local/render_regression.py:33 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
tools/render_regress/regress.py:91 | Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
tools/ci/check_preset_layers.py:48 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
tools/ci/check_preset_layers.py:54 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
tools/ci/check_preset_states.py:59 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.correctness.common-mistakes.string-concat-in-list |
tools/ci/check_preset_states.py:65 | Detected strings that are implicitly concatenated inside a list. Python will implicitly concatenate strings when not explicitly delimited. Was this supposed to be individual elements of the list? | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-memset |
src/backend/afp_render_context.h:13 | When handling sensitive information in a buffer, it's important to ensure that the data is securely erased before the buffer is deleted or reused. While `memset()` is commonly used for this purpose, it can leave sensitive information... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-6w46-j5rx-g56g |
tools/ci/uv.lock | [email protected] (PyPI) is affected by PYSEC-2026-1845, GHSA-6w46-j5rx-g56g | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:223 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:314 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:373 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:55 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| low | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/quality-gates.yml:22 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| info | zizmor/superfluous-actions |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:404 | action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 5 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 45 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 1 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 13 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 75f504c8835a | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 82 | 70 |
| 2026-11-14 | 75f504c8835a | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 82 | 70 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Radioo/573Renderer
- Commit:
75f504c8835a59b27408940b51fe5814428b9eb1 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 82 | strong | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 70 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 1 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 45.1%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 1 | 2 |
- AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 0 of 109,469.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07 | 29,823 | 0% |
| 2026-08 | 75,343 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 85,162 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 1,057 | 0% |
| 2026-11 | 183 | 0% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: on merged branch (7d32ad52bc) (179339a18ea6)
- 3,275 lines of first-party code in ~1.2h (2,804 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (61d22b79b4b6)
- 1,777 lines of first-party code in ~1.0h (1,699 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (804cea5112c2)
- CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)
- 7,646 lines of first-party code in ~4.8h (1,577 lines/hour, 12 commit session) (c4d0bb7c2504)
- 2,483 lines of first-party code in ~1.6h (1,540 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (fde0379b773d)
- 3,561 lines of first-party code in ~2.3h (1,529 lines/hour, 3 commit session) (72d24c8adc5d)
- 2,351 lines of first-party code in ~1.5h (1,525 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (cda3fff90b2a)
- 2,928 lines of first-party code in ~2.2h (1,333 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (fc24565e759d)
- 3,821 lines of first-party code in ~3.2h (1,196 lines/hour, 9 commit session) (9cc74c2ef535)
- 2,183 lines of first-party code in ~2.2h (989 lines/hour, 4 commit session) (7d69a80cfeff)
- 1,893 lines of first-party code in ~1.9h (986 lines/hour, 4 commit session) (acaedd8c6d57)
- 3,837 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (959 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (735eb6b09a21)
- 2,194 lines of first-party code in ~2.3h (942 lines/hour, 6 commit session) (71aa63555e87)
- 3,621 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (905 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (6d1a8b628d28)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.52, CI runs tests; 9% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 76 |
| Duplication | 83 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 98 |
| Tests and CI | 100 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 5,151; mean complexity 4.1, 90th percentile 9; 63 complex and 19 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 3.1% of 75,986 compared
- Tests: 57,171 test lines for 109,469 source lines (ratio 0.52); CI test commands: pytest, ctest; 91% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- Editor::Window::ShowTimelineMenu in editor/src/editor_timeline_menu.cpp: complexity 74, 184 lines
- main in editor/src/editor_shot_main.cpp: complexity 73, 214 lines
- Editor::Window::ShowKeyMenu in editor/src/editor_keys.cpp: complexity 47, 136 lines
- Editor::Icons::Named in editor/src/editor_icons.cpp: complexity 39, 81 lines
- AfpScript::PushOperandSize in src/formats/afp_script.cpp: complexity 36, 47 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 1 known vulnerabilities in 1 dependencies; 12 high-severity SAST findings; 39 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 96 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 95 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 0 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 1 in 1 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 1, low 0)
-
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/check_editor_starts.py:17 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/preset_dump.py:41 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/run_format.py:32 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/run_format.py:50 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:31 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:90 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'check_output' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:90 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:171 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-tainted-env-args: Detected subprocess function 'run' with user controlled data. A malicious actor could leverage this to perform command injection. You may consider using 'shlex.quote()'. [confidence medium] |
tools/ci/run_tidy.py:171 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/local/preset_sweep.py:49 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/local/render_regression.py:33 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'run' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
tools/render_regress/regress.py:91 |
| high | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:16 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:56 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:69 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:75 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:92 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:111 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:167 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:176 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:187 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:193 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:204 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:224 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-renderer.yml:236 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v1.3.0 ships 573Editor.zip (2 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.3.0 ships 573Renderer.zip (2 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.2.0 ships 573Renderer.exe (52 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.2.0 ships 573Renderer32.exe (7 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.0 ships 573Renderer.exe (43 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 109,469; test lines: 57,171
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C++ | 144,508 |
| C | 19,726 |
| Python | 2,341 |
| Shell | 65 |