Leaderboard github.com
PoweredBySalt/Portfolio-Website
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 43%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
48/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
73/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-1010,351 · 0% AI
- 2026-11887 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 13
- effective_loc
- 11,238
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 10,255
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 120.50
- measured_loc
- 983
- median_loc_per_hour
- 70.75
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 5
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 10,451
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
48 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity59
- Duplication69
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation40
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok5 items
- update in javascript/magneticEdges.js: complexity 33, 99 lines
- SMTP::authenticate in PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php: complexity 32, 115 lines
- SMTP::get_lines in PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php: complexity 17, 73 lines
- build in javascript/magneticEdges.js: complexity 16, 61 lines
- (anonymous) in javascript/magneticEdges.js: complexity 6, 102 lines
- complex_functions
- 4
- function_nloc
- 2,543
- functions
- 222
- long_functions
- 2
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.86
- p90_ccn
- 6
- risky_nloc_share
- 17.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok7 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: PHPMailer/src/DSNConfigurator.php:1 and PHPMailer/src/OAuth.php:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: PHPMailer/src/DSNConfigurator.php:5 and PHPMailer/src/Exception.php:5
- 6+ duplicated lines: PHPMailer/src/Exception.php:7 and PHPMailer/src/OAuth.php:7
- 6+ duplicated lines: PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:421 and PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php:140
- 6+ duplicated lines: PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:1104 and PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:1203
- 6+ duplicated lines: PHPMailer/src/POP3.php:164 and PHPMailer/src/POP3.php:191
- 6+ duplicated lines: datenschutz.php:5 and impressum.php:5
- compared_lines
- 7,036
- duplicated_lines
- 431
- duplicated_share
- 6.1%
- files
- 24
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 10,451
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 9
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 10,451
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 61
Type safetyskipped
Security
73 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 7 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)76
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 14
- findings_high
- 7
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 7
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 10,451
- weighted_findings
- 8.05
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
7 high7 medium
14 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.exec-use |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:1889 | Executing non-constant commands. This can lead to command injection. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.exec-use |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:1917 | Executing non-constant commands. This can lead to command injection. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php:718 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php:726 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.file-inclusion |
dev-router.php:33 | Detected non-constant file inclusion. This can lead to local file inclusion (LFI) or remote file inclusion (RFI) if user input reaches this statement. LFI and RFI could lead to sensitive files being obtained by attackers. Instead,... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
javascript/popup.js:278 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
javascript/popup.js:278 | User controlled data in a `description_left.querySelector("p").innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:3250 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:3253 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:3259 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.injection.tainted-filename |
dev-router.php:21 | File name based on user input risks server-side request forgery. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.injection.tainted-filename |
dev-router.php:32 | File name based on user input risks server-side request forgery. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.injection.tainted-filename |
dev-router.php:38 | File name based on user input risks server-side request forgery. [confidence medium] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
mailer.php:81 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 14 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 1f72c4fb8012 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 48 | 73 |
| 2026-11-14 | 1f72c4fb8012 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 48 | 73 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/PoweredBySalt/Portfolio-Website
- Commit:
1f72c4fb8012dccb854e246399b0a38db731b060 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 43% | 100% |
| Code quality | 48 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 73 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 10,351 | 0% |
| 2026-11 | 887 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 18% of function code in complex or long functions; 6% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 59 |
| Duplication | 69 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 222; mean complexity 2.9, 90th percentile 6; 4 complex and 2 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 6.1% of 7,036 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 10,451 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- update in javascript/magneticEdges.js: complexity 33, 99 lines
- SMTP::authenticate in PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php: complexity 32, 115 lines
- SMTP::get_lines in PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php: complexity 17, 73 lines
- build in javascript/magneticEdges.js: complexity 16, 61 lines
- (anonymous) in javascript/magneticEdges.js: complexity 6, 102 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 7 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 76 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.exec-use: Executing non-constant commands. This can lead to command injection. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:1889 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.exec-use: Executing non-constant commands. This can lead to command injection. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:1917 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php:718 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/SMTP.php:726 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.file-inclusion: Detected non-constant file inclusion. This can lead to local file inclusion (LFI) or remote file inclusion (RFI) if user input reaches this statement. LFI and RFI could lead to sensitive files being obtained by attackers. Instead, explicitly specify what to include. If that is not a viable solution, [confidence low] |
dev-router.php:33 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
javascript/popup.js:278 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a description_left.querySelector("p").innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
javascript/popup.js:278 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use: Using user input when deleting files with unlink() is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:3250 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use: Using user input when deleting files with unlink() is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:3253 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use: Using user input when deleting files with unlink() is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] |
PHPMailer/src/PHPMailer.php:3259 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.injection.tainted-filename: File name based on user input risks server-side request forgery. [confidence medium] |
dev-router.php:21 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.injection.tainted-filename: File name based on user input risks server-side request forgery. [confidence medium] |
dev-router.php:32 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.injection.tainted-filename: File name based on user input risks server-side request forgery. [confidence medium] |
dev-router.php:38 |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use: Using user input when deleting files with unlink() is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] |
mailer.php:81 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 10,451; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| PHP | 9,299 |
| JavaScript | 1,152 |