Leaderboard github.com
Morveus/everquest-spell-keys
Your EverQuest spell gems live on your keys — plugins for Logitech MX Creative Console and Elgato Stream Deck
unreviewed-ai-risk
AI provenance
100%
explicit
- Confidence
- 79%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
47/100
poor
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
82/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
100% explicit
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share100%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share100%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Attributed AI tools
| Tool | Commits | Lines added | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 35 | 4,541 | 2026-08-02 | 2026-08-13 |
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-084,541 · 100% AI
Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest
From git blame: 3,242 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.
| Findings per 1,000 lines | AI-attributed | Other | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 5.86 | — | — |
| Security | 0.00 | — | — |
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok26 items
- Claude Code: 35 attributed commits, 4,541 lines added
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude'
- attributed_commit_share
- 97.2%
- attributed_commits
- 35
- attributed_loc
- 4,541
- attributed_loc_share
- 100.0%
- commits
- 36
- effective_loc
- 4,541
- tools_detected
- 1
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 390.28
- measured_loc
- 4,541
- median_loc_per_hour
- 294.10
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 10
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 429.30
- releases
- 1
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 3,242
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Findings in AI-written linesok
- ai_lines
- 3,242
- blame_failures
- 0
- files_blamed
- 18
- other_lines
- 0
- quality:ai_findings
- 19
- quality:ai_per_kloc
- 5.86
- quality:other_findings
- 0
- security:ai_findings
- 0
- security:ai_per_kloc
- 0
- security:other_findings
- 0
Code quality
47 poor
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 30% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity41
- Duplication97
- Lint and smells69
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok9 items
- SpellBarReader::Update in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 51, 168 lines
- Tga::Load in core/EqIconLib.cs: complexity 25, 77 lines
- SpellBarReader::LoadState in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 23, 46 lines
- SpellBarReader::LocateBar in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 20, 63 lines
- EqGame::FindGameDir in core/EqGame.cs: complexity 19, 88 lines
- Matcher::FindBar in core/EqIconLib.cs: complexity 19, 58 lines
- Matcher::FindGridPeriodic in core/EqIconLib.cs: complexity 17, 53 lines
- SpellBarReader::ClimbToTop in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 17, 42 lines
- SpellBarReader::ReidentifyGems in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 17, 40 lines
- complex_functions
- 9
- function_nloc
- 2,136
- functions
- 123
- long_functions
- 1
- many_param_functions
- 2
- mean_ccn
- 5.07
- p90_ccn
- 13
- risky_nloc_share
- 29.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item
- compared_lines
- 2,069
- duplicated_lines
- 12
- duplicated_share
- 0.6%
- files
- 18
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 19
- findings
- 19
- scanned_lines
- 3,242
- weighted_findings
- 4.75
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 28
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 3,242
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 152
Type safetyskipped
Security
82 adequate
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 3,242
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok2 items
- release v1.1.0 ships everquest-streamdeck-v1.1.0.zip (0 downloads)
- release v1.0.0 ships EverQuestSpells-v1.0.0.zip (0 downloads)
- binary_assets
- 2
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
19 low
19 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/IconUpdater.cs:148 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/IconUpdater.cs:68 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/IconUpdater.cs:74 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:1005 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:1017 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:1039 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:1206 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:265 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:286 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:362 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:610 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:838 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:846 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
core/SpellBarReader.cs:889 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
plugin/EverQuestPlugin/EverQuestPlugin.cs:40 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
streamdeck/EverQuestStreamDeck/Program.cs:115 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
streamdeck/EverQuestStreamDeck/Program.cs:94 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
streamdeck/EverQuestStreamDeck/SpellKeys.cs:64 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/csharp.lang.best-practice.structured-logging |
streamdeck/EverQuestStreamDeck/SpellKeys.cs:70 | String interpolation in log message obscures the distinction between variables and the log message. Use structured logging instead, where the variables are passed as additional arguments and the interpolation is performed by the logging... | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Findings in AI-written lines | AI provenance | ok | git-blame | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 19 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 0c89d6e00c20 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 47 | 82 |
| 2026-11-14 | 0c89d6e00c20 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 100% | 47 | 82 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Morveus/everquest-spell-keys
- Commit:
0c89d6e00c202a7caa7c23a1c08400b22a757085 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 100 | explicit | 79% | 100% |
| Code quality | 47 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 82 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 35 | 4,541 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 3,242 of 3,242.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 4,541 | 100% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (0c89d6e00c20)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8c99894da42d)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (278d059be691)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (25b0dea8c195)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3af4fbb33214)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b8edeed779ba)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (08d9b42b2ded)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (738f8160e477)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (5329e9af8eb9)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (35827c8caaf4)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2c5bb8a98cd5)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (58433da983e4)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (097c0092be0e)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a1f490d2bfbc)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3bb5437f3f6b)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 30% of function code in complex or long functions; 1% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 41 |
| Duplication | 97 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 69 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 123; mean complexity 5.1, 90th percentile 13; 9 complex and 1 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 0.6% of 2,069 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 3,242 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- SpellBarReader::Update in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 51, 168 lines
- Tga::Load in core/EqIconLib.cs: complexity 25, 77 lines
- SpellBarReader::LoadState in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 23, 46 lines
- SpellBarReader::LocateBar in core/SpellBarReader.cs: complexity 20, 63 lines
- EqGame::FindGameDir in core/EqGame.cs: complexity 19, 88 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v1.1.0 ships everquest-streamdeck-v1.1.0.zip (0 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v1.0.0 ships EverQuestSpells-v1.0.0.zip (0 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 3,242; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C# | 3,242 |