Leaderboard github.com
Monnoroch/ColorHighlighter
ColorHighlighter - is a plugin for the Sublime text 2 and 3, which underlays selected hexadecimal colorcodes (like "#FFFFFF", "rgb(255,255,255)", "white", etc.) with their real color. Also, plugin adds color picker to easily modify colors. Documentation: https://monnoroch.github.io/ColorHighlighter.
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
57/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
77/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2012-03135 · 0% AI
- 2012-04222 · 0% AI
- 2012-05696 · 0% AI
- 2012-072 · 0% AI
- 2013-02267 · 0% AI
- 2013-032 · 0% AI
- 2013-0444 · 0% AI
- 2013-051 · 0% AI
- 2013-080 · 0% AI
- 2013-112 · 0% AI
- 2014-031,149 · 0% AI
- 2014-042,110 · 0% AI
- 2014-05363 · 0% AI
- 2014-0628 · 0% AI
- 2014-0716 · 0% AI
- 2014-083 · 0% AI
- 2014-0930 · 0% AI
- 2014-1022 · 0% AI
- 2014-110 · 0% AI
- 2014-1254 · 0% AI
- 2015-024 · 0% AI
- 2015-031 · 0% AI
- 2015-040 · 0% AI
- 2015-060 · 0% AI
- 2015-082,551 · 0% AI
- 2015-09615 · 0% AI
- 2015-1024,289 · 0% AI
- 2015-121 · 0% AI
- 2016-02113 · 0% AI
- 2016-033 · 0% AI
- 2016-061 · 0% AI
- 2016-090 · 0% AI
- 2016-1024 · 0% AI
- 2017-070 · 0% AI
- 2017-080 · 0% AI
- 2017-098,390 · 0% AI
- 2017-10309 · 0% AI
- 2017-127 · 0% AI
- 2018-010 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 435
- effective_loc
- 41,454
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 32,375
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 236.58
- measured_loc
- 9,079
- median_loc_per_hour
- 64.80
- pr_timed_units
- 2
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 9,079
- work_units
- 168
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 1,555.20
- releases
- 12
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 17,939
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
57 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.16, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 16% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
How the score is built
- Complexity80
- Duplication39
- Lint and smells87
- Tests and CI44
- Documentation40
- Type safety40
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok7 items
- ColorEditor::ValueChangedHandler in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs: complexity 25, 62 lines
- _write in elementtree/ElementTree.py: complexity 24, 52 lines
- ColorEditor::UpdateFields in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs: complexity 18, 47 lines
- ColorGrid::OnPaint in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorGrid.cs: complexity 16, 52 lines
- __init__ in elementtree/ElementPath.py: complexity 16, 27 lines
- ColorEditor::InitializeComponent in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.Designer.cs: complexity 1, 244 lines
- ColorPickerDialog::InitializeComponent in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorPickerDialog.Designer.cs: complexity 1, 120 lines
- complex_functions
- 5
- function_nloc
- 7,884
- functions
- 778
- long_functions
- 2
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.51
- p90_ccn
- 5
- risky_nloc_share
- 7.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/AdobePhotoShopColorSwatchSerializer.cs:1 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/AdobePhotoShopColorSwatchSerializer.cs:9 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorCollection.cs:8
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/AdobePhotoShopColorSwatchSerializer.cs:11 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/InterleavedBitmapPaletteSerializer.cs:8
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/AdobePhotoShopColorSwatchSerializer.cs:29 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/GimpPaletteSerializer.cs:21
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/AdobePhotoshopColorSwatchColorSpace.cs:1 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/AdobePhotoshopColorSwatchFileVersion.cs:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorCollection.cs:1 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorCollectionEventArgs.cs:1
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorComparer.cs:45 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorComparer.cs:75
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs:59 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditorManager.cs:41
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs:69 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorSlider.cs:175
- 6+ duplicated lines: ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs:131 and ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorWheel.cs:372
- compared_lines
- 11,231
- duplicated_lines
- 1,754
- duplicated_share
- 15.6%
- files
- 88
Lintok
- category:best-practice
- 3
- category:correctness
- 5
- findings
- 8
- scanned_lines
- 17,778
- weighted_findings
- 10.25
Tests and CIok1 item
- CI config: .gitlab-ci.yml
.gitlab-ci.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 209
- cochange_share
- 1.9%
- source_lines
- 17,939
- test_lines
- 2,838
- test_ratio
- 0.16
Documentationok1 item
- README.md
README.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- no
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 115
Type safetyok
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- no
- escapes
- 0
- escapes_per_kloc
- 0
Security
77 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 8 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)87
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 9
- findings_high
- 8
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 17,778
- weighted_findings
- 7.30
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 1.5%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
11 high1 medium5 low
17 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:608 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:687 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.best-practice.open-never-closed |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:927 | file object opened without corresponding close | Lint |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml |
color_scheme.py:4 | The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml |
color_scheme_color_highlighter.py:4 | The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:1172 | The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:1254 | The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
gutter_icons_color_highlighter.py:119 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.subprocess-shell-true |
gutter_icons_color_highlighter.py:119 | Found 'subprocess' function 'Popen' with 'shell=True'. This is dangerous because this call will spawn the command using a shell process. Doing so propagates current shell settings and variables, which makes it much easier for a... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml |
main.py:48 | The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit |
pick_color_command.py:61 | Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/dockerfile.security.secret-in-build-arg |
ci/Dockerfile:41 | Docker build time arguments are not suited for secrets, because the argument values are saved with the image. Running `docker image history` on the image will show information on how the image was built, including arguments. If these... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
ci/integration-tests.sh:17 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
ci/run-container.sh:43 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
ci/run-container.sh:44 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
ci/run-integration-test.sh:14 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
ci/run-integration-test.sh:5 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 8 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 9 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 833bcfb55820 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 57 | 77 |
| 2026-11-14 | 833bcfb55820 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 57 | 77 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Monnoroch/ColorHighlighter
- Commit:
833bcfb55820c1a36c554c127d6c8ff2d5ea36b0 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:01+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 57 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 77 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-03 | 1 | 0% |
| 2015-08 | 2,551 | 0% |
| 2015-09 | 615 | 0% |
| 2015-10 | 24,289 | 0% |
| 2015-12 | 1 | 0% |
| 2016-02 | 113 | 0% |
| 2016-03 | 3 | 0% |
| 2016-06 | 1 | 0% |
| 2016-10 | 24 | 0% |
| 2017-09 | 8,390 | 0% |
| 2017-10 | 309 | 0% |
| 2017-12 | 7 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.16, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 16% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 80 |
| Duplication | 39 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 87 |
| Tests and CI | 44 |
| Documentation | 40 |
| Type safety | 40 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 778; mean complexity 2.5, 90th percentile 5; 5 complex and 2 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 15.6% of 11,231 compared
- Tests: 2,838 test lines for 17,939 source lines (ratio 0.16); CI test commands: none detected; 2% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- ColorEditor::ValueChangedHandler in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs: complexity 25, 62 lines
- _write in elementtree/ElementTree.py: complexity 24, 52 lines
- ColorEditor::UpdateFields in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorEditor.cs: complexity 18, 47 lines
- ColorGrid::OnPaint in ColorPicker/winapi/Cyotek.Windows.Forms.ColorPicker/ColorGrid.cs: complexity 16, 52 lines
- init in elementtree/ElementPath.py: complexity 16, 27 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 8 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 87 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
color_scheme.py:4 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
color_scheme_color_highlighter.py:4 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:1172 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
elementtree/ElementTree.py:1254 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
gutter_icons_color_highlighter.py:119 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.subprocess-shell-true: Found 'subprocess' function 'Popen' with 'shell=True'. This is dangerous because this call will spawn the command using a shell process. Doing so propagates current shell settings and variables, which makes it much easier for a malicious actor to execute commands. Use 'shell=False' instead. [confidence medium] |
gutter_icons_color_highlighter.py:119 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] |
main.py:48 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
pick_color_command.py:61 |
| medium | opengrep/dockerfile.security.secret-in-build-arg: Docker build time arguments are not suited for secrets, because the argument values are saved with the image. Running docker image history on the image will show information on how the image was built, including arguments. If these contain plain text secrets, anyone with access to the docker image [confidence low] |
ci/Dockerfile:41 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 17,939; test lines: 2,838
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C# | 11,979 |
| Python | 8,282 |
| Shell | 306 |
| Objective-C | 161 |
| C++ | 49 |