Leaderboard github.com

MathiasDevelopes/otpuac

Gate Windows UAC prompts behind OTP

View repository ↗
Rust
★ 0
commit b1a44f36e1b3
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

16%

explicit

Confidence: 77%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

75/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

62/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

16% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 16% of first-party code added; an estimated 16% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share16%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts18%
Estimated AI-generated share16%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace1
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	11	1,521	2026-10-02	2026-10-03

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-067,911 · 0% AI
2026-101,521 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 1,098 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 1,829 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.00	—
Security	10.93	7.65	1.43×

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok12 items

attributed_commit_share: 39.3%
attributed_commits: 11
attributed_loc: 1,521
attributed_loc_share: 16.1%
commits: 28
effective_loc: 9,432
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok1 item

AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2026-06-23
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok1 item

1,721 lines of first-party code in ~1.1h (1,590 lines/hour, 1 commit session)

excluded_import_loc: 5,262
flagged_loc: 1,721
flagged_loc_share: 41.3%
flagged_units: 1
max_loc_per_hour: 1,589.84
measured_loc: 4,170
median_loc_per_hour: 304
pr_timed_units: 10
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 15

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 443.70
releases: 1

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 2,927
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 1,098
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 29
other_lines: 1,829
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 0
quality:other_per_kloc: 0
security:ai_findings: 12
security:ai_per_kloc: 10.93
security:other_findings: 14
security:other_per_kloc: 7.65
security:ratio: 1.43

Code quality

75 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

Complexity100
Duplication90
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI35
Documentation65
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok

complex_functions: 0
function_nloc: 1,842
functions: 166
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.34
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 0.0%

Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items

compared_lines: 1,963
duplicated_lines: 36
duplicated_share: 1.8%
files: 29

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 2,741
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok3 items

CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/rust.yml .github/workflows/rust.yml
CI runs tests (go test, cargo test)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: no
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 2
cochange_commits: 20
cochange_share: 0.0%
source_lines: 2,927
test_lines: 0
test_ratio: 0

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 49

Type safetyskipped

Security

62 weak

Security posture is weak: 1 known vulnerabilities in 1 dependencies; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)44
Vulnerable dependencies95
CI workflows9
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 11
declared: 11
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 26
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 26
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 2,741
weighted_findings: 6.50

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 3
vulnerabilities: 1
vulnerable_packages: 1
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 0
vulns_low: 0
vulns_medium: 0
vulns_unknown: 1

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 21
findings_high: 12
findings_low: 6
findings_medium: 3
penalty: 143.70
workflows: 2

Security postureok3 items

crates/otpuac-core/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/otpuac-core/Cargo.toml
crates/otpuac-provider/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/otpuac-provider/Cargo.toml
crates/otpuac-setup/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/otpuac-setup/Cargo.toml

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: no
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 50.0%
unpinned_manifests: 3

Release downloadsok4 items

binary_assets: 4
signals: 1
suspicious: 0

Findings

12 high4 medium29 low3 info

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:100	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:115	code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:29	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:36	code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:38	code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/release.yml:53	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:53	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:18	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:20	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:43	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:45	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:65	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:1	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:13	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:34	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0385`	Cargo.lock	[email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0385	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/release.yml:28	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:18	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/rust.yml:43	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`	crates/otpuac-core/src/vault.rs:189	temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:105	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:42	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:54	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:63	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:65	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:71	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:85	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:91	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/install.rs:158	temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/main.rs:73	current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change...	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows.rs:18	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:114	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:129	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:144	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:155	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:162	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:30	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:61	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/account.rs:88	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/registry.rs:16	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/registry.rs:26	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/registry.rs:47	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/registry.rs:50	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/security.rs:19	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`	crates/otpuac-setup/src/platform/windows/security.rs:31	Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	Static analysis (opengrep)
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:116	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:73	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
info	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/release.yml:78	code injection via template expansion [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	21
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	1
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	26
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`b1a44f36e1b3`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	16%	75	62
2026-11-14	`b1a44f36e1b3`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	16%	75	62

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/MathiasDevelopes/otpuac
Commit: b1a44f36e1b38c81ba6949ff8447fbf8928fcdc8
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	16	explicit	77%	100%
Code quality	75	adequate	90%	100%
Security	62	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 16% of first-party code added; an estimated 16% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 16.1%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 18.2%
Estimated AI-generated share: 16.1%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	11	1,521

AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 1,098 of 2,927.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Quality	0.0	0.0	n/a
Security	10.929	7.654	1.43x

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-06	7,911	0%
2026-10	1,521	100%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (b1a44f36e1b3)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9d7fa0c5b9cd)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (ba8ba1fa0f5d)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (e074e384d285)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (f837b58cfb9c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (6853d53201bd)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (46c4ce988904)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (1099ecf4b996)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (3b1ee7fa66d9)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (e93cec473c86)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (6a25c76cc78e)
AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
1,721 lines of first-party code in ~1.1h (1,590 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (50b2ec2d6ba4)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	100
Duplication	90
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	35
Documentation	65
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 166; mean complexity 2.3, 90th percentile 5; 0 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 1.8% of 1,963 compared
Tests: 0 test lines for 2,927 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: go test, cargo test; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is weak: 1 known vulnerabilities in 1 dependencies; 12 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	44
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	95
CI workflows (zizmor)	9
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 1 in 1 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 0, low 0)
Posture checks passed: signed commits; missing: security policy, dependency updates, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:36
high	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:38
high	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:115
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:29
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:53
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:100
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:53
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:18
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:20
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:43
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:45
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:65
medium	`osv/RUSTSEC-2026-0385`: [email protected] (crates.io) is affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0385	Cargo.lock
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:1
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:13
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/rust.yml:34
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir`: temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary directory must use a secure method to create a uniquely named file. [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/vault.rs:189
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:42
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:54
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:63
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:65
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:71
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:85
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:91
low	`opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage`: Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high]	crates/otpuac-core/src/win.rs:105

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

binary-release-asset: release v1.0.1 ships OTPUAC-1.0.1-windows-x64.zip (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v1.0.1 ships OTPUAC-Setup-1.0.1-x64.exe (1 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v1.0.0 ships OTPUAC-1.0.0-windows-x64.zip (0 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v1.0.0 ships OTPUAC-Setup-1.0.0-x64.exe (2 downloads)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

Source lines: 2,927; test lines: 0

Language	Lines
Rust	2,741
PowerShell	186