RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

MarioAriasC/funKTionale

Functional constructs for Kotlin

  • View repository ↗
  • Kotlin
  • ★ 913
  • commit 48d2589761d0
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

64/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

82/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2013-031,454 · 0% AI
  2. 2013-04305 · 0% AI
  3. 2013-051,225 · 0% AI
  4. 2013-060 · 0% AI
  5. 2013-080 · 0% AI
  6. 2013-100 · 0% AI
  7. 2013-120 · 0% AI
  8. 2014-03321 · 0% AI
  9. 2014-0711 · 0% AI
  10. 2014-101,293 · 0% AI
  11. 2014-12677 · 0% AI
  12. 2015-03579 · 0% AI
  13. 2015-05447 · 0% AI
  14. 2015-060 · 0% AI
  15. 2015-0785 · 0% AI
  16. 2015-08134 · 0% AI
  17. 2015-09353 · 0% AI
  18. 2015-10341 · 0% AI
  19. 2015-120 · 0% AI
  20. 2016-021,017 · 0% AI
  21. 2016-0668 · 0% AI
  22. 2016-08808 · 0% AI
  23. 2016-09274 · 0% AI
  24. 2016-11768 · 0% AI
  25. 2016-127,730 · 0% AI
  26. 2017-020 · 0% AI
  27. 2017-0366 · 0% AI
  28. 2017-0474 · 0% AI
  29. 2017-051,194 · 0% AI
  30. 2017-06206 · 0% AI
  31. 2017-1141 · 0% AI
  32. 2018-030 · 0% AI
  33. 2019-120 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
128
effective_loc
19,471
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
1,297.90
measured_loc
19,471
median_loc_per_hour
77.34
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
5,864
pre_ai_era_bursts
1
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
19,471
work_units
59
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
318.40
releases
30
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
5,559
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

64 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.25, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 19% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication31
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI42
  • Documentation40
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
1,411
functions
240
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
34
mean_ccn
1.52
p90_ccn
2
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok5 items
compared_lines
3,068
duplicated_lines
597
duplicated_share
19.5%
files
33
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
5,559
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
84
cochange_share
71.4%
source_lines
5,559
test_lines
1,377
test_ratio
0.25
Documentationok1 item
  • README.md README.md
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
no
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
48
Type safetyskipped

Security

82 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 3 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependencies83
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
5,559
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
11
vulnerabilities
3
vulnerable_packages
2
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
1
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
2
vulns_unknown
0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
1.6%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

1 high2 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high osv/GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r funktionale-all/pom.xml org.assertj:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r; also in funktionale-collections/pom.xml; also in funktionale-complement/pom.xml; also in funktionale-composition/pom.xml; also in funktionale-currying/pom.xml;... Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-2qp4-g3q3-f92w funktionale-all/pom.xml org.jetbrains.kotlin:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-2qp4-g3q3-f92w; also in funktionale-collections/pom.xml; also in funktionale-complement/pom.xml; also in funktionale-composition/pom.xml; also in... Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium osv/GHSA-cqj8-47ch-rvvq funktionale-all/pom.xml org.jetbrains.kotlin:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-cqj8-47ch-rvvq; also in funktionale-collections/pom.xml; also in funktionale-complement/pom.xml; also in funktionale-composition/pom.xml; also in... Dependencies (osv-scanner)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.13
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1448d2589761d0prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6482
2026-11-1448d2589761d0prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%6482

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MarioAriasC/funKTionale/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MarioAriasC/funKTionale/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MarioAriasC/funKTionale/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MarioAriasC/funKTionale/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MarioAriasC/funKTionale/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MarioAriasC/funKTionale/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 64 weak 90% 100%
Security 82 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2015-10 341 0%
2016-02 1,017 0%
2016-06 68 0%
2016-08 808 0%
2016-09 274 0%
2016-11 768 0%
2016-12 7,730 0%
2017-03 66 0%
2017-04 74 0%
2017-05 1,194 0%
2017-06 206 0%
2017-11 41 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.25, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 19% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 31
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 42
Documentation 40
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 240; mean complexity 1.5, 90th percentile 2; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 19.5% of 3,068 compared
  • Tests: 1,377 test lines for 5,559 source lines (ratio 0.25); CI test commands: none detected; 71% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: license, contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: 3 known vulnerabilities in 2 dependencies. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 83
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Known vulnerabilities: 3 in 2 packages (critical 0, high 1, medium 2, low 0)

  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high osv/GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r: org.assertj:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-rqfh-9r24-8c9r; also in funktionale-collections/pom.xml; also in funktionale-complement/pom.xml; also in funktionale-composition/pom.xml; also in funktionale-currying/pom.xml; also in funktionale-either/pom.xml; also in funktionale-experimental/pom.xml; also in funktionale-memoization/pom.xml; also in funktionale-option/pom.xml; also in funktionale-pairing/pom.xml; also in funktionale-partials/pom.xml; also in funktionale-pipe/pom.xml; also in funktionale-reverse/pom.xml; also in funktionale-state/pom.xml; also in funktionale-try/pom.xml; also in funktionale-utils/pom.xml; also in funktionale-validation/pom.xml; also in pom.xml funktionale-all/pom.xml
medium osv/GHSA-2qp4-g3q3-f92w: org.jetbrains.kotlin:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-2qp4-g3q3-f92w; also in funktionale-collections/pom.xml; also in funktionale-complement/pom.xml; also in funktionale-composition/pom.xml; also in funktionale-currying/pom.xml; also in funktionale-either/pom.xml; also in funktionale-experimental/pom.xml; also in funktionale-memoization/pom.xml; also in funktionale-option/pom.xml; also in funktionale-pairing/pom.xml; also in funktionale-partials/pom.xml; also in funktionale-pipe/pom.xml; also in funktionale-reverse/pom.xml; also in funktionale-state/pom.xml; also in funktionale-try/pom.xml; also in funktionale-utils/pom.xml; also in funktionale-validation/pom.xml; also in pom.xml funktionale-all/pom.xml
medium osv/GHSA-cqj8-47ch-rvvq: org.jetbrains.kotlin:[email protected] (Maven) is affected by GHSA-cqj8-47ch-rvvq; also in funktionale-collections/pom.xml; also in funktionale-complement/pom.xml; also in funktionale-composition/pom.xml; also in funktionale-currying/pom.xml; also in funktionale-either/pom.xml; also in funktionale-experimental/pom.xml; also in funktionale-memoization/pom.xml; also in funktionale-option/pom.xml; also in funktionale-pairing/pom.xml; also in funktionale-partials/pom.xml; also in funktionale-pipe/pom.xml; also in funktionale-reverse/pom.xml; also in funktionale-state/pom.xml; also in funktionale-try/pom.xml; also in funktionale-utils/pom.xml; also in funktionale-validation/pom.xml; also in pom.xml funktionale-all/pom.xml

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 5,559; test lines: 1,377
Language Lines
Kotlin 6,936