RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer

Media player for Windows using BASS

  • View repository ↗
  • C
  • ★ 0
  • commit 0631132fbd01
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

27%

explicit

Confidence
88%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

56/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

66/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

27% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 27% of first-party code added; an estimated 27% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share27%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share27%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code176742026-08-022026-10-14

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-061,132 · 0% AI
  2. 2026-070 · 0% AI
  3. 2026-08600 · 100% AI
  4. 2026-10103 · 72% AI
  5. 2026-11639 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 509 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 860 to others. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.000.00—
Security0.002.330.00×

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok18 items
attributed_commit_share
23.9%
attributed_commits
17
attributed_loc
674
attributed_loc_share
27.2%
commits
71
effective_loc
2,474
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
158.83
measured_loc
2,474
median_loc_per_hour
68.40
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
24
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
1,493.90
releases
5
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
1,369
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
509
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
1
other_lines
860
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:ai_per_kloc
0
quality:other_findings
0
quality:other_per_kloc
0
security:ai_findings
0
security:ai_per_kloc
0
security:other_findings
2
security:other_per_kloc
2.33
security:ratio
0

Code quality

56 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 34% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity36
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok6 items
complex_functions
6
function_nloc
1,006
functions
60
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
6.08
p90_ccn
16
risky_nloc_share
33.9%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
1,072
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
1
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
1,369
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .github/workflows/build.yml .github/workflows/build.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
45
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
1,369
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
107
Type safetyskipped

Security

66 weak

Security posture is weak: 7 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)88
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows23
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
2
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
2
parse_errors
1
scanned_lines
1,369
weighted_findings
0.50
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
13
findings_high
7
findings_low
4
findings_medium
2
penalty
88.40
workflows
1
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
0.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
16
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

7 high4 medium2 low2 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:125 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:234 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:251 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:263 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:283 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:415 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/build.yml:58 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:283 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/build.yml:58 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-strcat-fn player.c:1007 Finding triggers whenever there is a strcat or strncat used. This is an issue because strcat or strncat can lead to buffer overflow vulns. Fix this by using strcat_s instead. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-strcat-fn player.c:1008 Finding triggers whenever there is a strcat or strncat used. This is an issue because strcat or strncat can lead to buffer overflow vulns. Fix this by using strcat_s instead. [confidence low] Static analysis (opengrep)
low zizmor/misfeature .github/workflows/build.yml:141 usage of GitHub Actions misfeatures [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/misfeature .github/workflows/build.yml:352 usage of GitHub Actions misfeatures [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/build.yml:251 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/superfluous-actions .github/workflows/build.yml:263 action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.013
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4142
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-140631132fbd01prov-5+qual-2+sec-227%5666
2026-11-140631132fbd01prov-4+qual-2+sec-227%5666

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/MarcroSoft/BASSPlAIer
  • Commit: 0631132fbd0151456cadbbf059c747c118e69639
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 27 explicit 88% 100%
Code quality 56 weak 90% 100%
Security 66 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 27% of first-party code added; an estimated 27% including velocity signals.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 27.2%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 27.2%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 17 674

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 509 of 1,369.

Findings per 1,000 lines AI-attributed Other Ratio
Quality 0.0 0.0 n/a
Security 0.0 2.326 0.0x
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-06 1,132 0%
2026-08 600 100%
2026-10 103 72%
2026-11 639 0%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2690ae6d64d9)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4496a4c2cb44)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e783976eb8e7)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (074227f118c3)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f5a96448dec7)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bab178ca60bb)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (aad5aeaf4b8f)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (78906c67aecb)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (becc2534b692)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (41036cd5a029)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (686c27f9fe3a)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (895fcd266720)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c60887a586d5)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9eeeb833fb99)
  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (439c609b6b68)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 34% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 36
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 60; mean complexity 6.1, 90th percentile 16; 6 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 1,072 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 1,369 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 7 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 88
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 23
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:58
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:125
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:234
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:251
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:263
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:283
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:415
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-strcat-fn: Finding triggers whenever there is a strcat or strncat used. This is an issue because strcat or strncat can lead to buffer overflow vulns. Fix this by using strcat_s instead. [confidence low] player.c:1007
medium opengrep/c.lang.security.insecure-use-strcat-fn: Finding triggers whenever there is a strcat or strncat used. This is an issue because strcat or strncat can lead to buffer overflow vulns. Fix this by using strcat_s instead. [confidence low] player.c:1008
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/build.yml:58
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/build.yml:283
low zizmor/misfeature: usage of GitHub Actions misfeatures [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:141
low zizmor/misfeature: usage of GitHub Actions misfeatures [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:352
info zizmor/superfluous-actions: action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:251
info zizmor/superfluous-actions: action functionality is already included by the runner [confidence high] .github/workflows/build.yml:263

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 1,369; test lines: 0
Language Lines
C 1,369