RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout

A UICollectionViewLayout subclass that adds custom transitions/animations to the UICollectionView without effecting your existing code.

  • View repository ↗
  • Swift
  • ★ 4,854
  • commit f6d163d761f9
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
54%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

75/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

79/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON RepoTrust ai badgeRepoTrust quality badgeRepoTrust security badge

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2017-02986 · 0% AI
  2. 2017-041 · 0% AI
  3. 2017-052 · 0% AI
  4. 2017-071 · 0% AI
  5. 2017-088 · 0% AI
  6. 2018-095 · 0% AI
  7. 2018-110 · 0% AI
  8. 2019-030 · 0% AI
  9. 2019-1019 · 0% AI
  10. 2019-121 · 0% AI
  11. 2020-0943 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
57
effective_loc
1,066
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
166
measured_loc
1,066
median_loc_per_hour
166
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
1,066
work_units
18
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
40.60
releases
10
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
844
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

75 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication100
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation100
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
328
functions
52
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
1.83
p90_ccn
4
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok
compared_lines
525
duplicated_lines
0
duplicated_share
0.0%
files
17
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
844
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
23
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
844
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok4 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
yes
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
63
Type safetyskipped

Security

79 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)92
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
1
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
1
parse_errors
1
scanned_lines
844
weighted_findings
0.25
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
7.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

1 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
medium opengrep/swift.lang.crypto.insecure-random iOS Example/Source/ImageCollectionViewController.swift:23 A random number generator was detected which is **not** *guaranteed* to be Cryptographically secure. If the source of entropy is used for security purposes (e.g. with other Cryptographic operations), make sure to use the... Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4141
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14f6d163d761f9prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7579
2026-11-14f6d163d761f9prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%7579

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 54% 100%
Code quality 75 adequate 90% 100%
Security 79 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2017-02 986 0%
2017-04 1 0%
2017-05 2 0%
2017-07 1 0%
2017-08 8 0%
2018-09 5 0%
2019-10 19 0%
2019-12 1 0%
2020-09 43 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 100
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 100
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 52; mean complexity 1.8, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 525 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 844 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: none

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 92
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
medium opengrep/swift.lang.crypto.insecure-random: A random number generator was detected which is not guaranteed to be Cryptographically secure. If the source of entropy is used for security purposes (e.g. with other Cryptographic operations), make sure to use the SecCopyRandomBytes API explicitly. [confidence low] [iOS Example/Source/ImageCollectionViewController.swift:23](https://github.com/KelvinJin/AnimatedCollectionViewLayout/blob/f6d163d761f9cd8af16eee1a65558614b396a874/iOS Example/Source/ImageCollectionViewController.swift#L23)

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 844; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Swift 762
Ruby 63
C 19