RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

JunkFood02/Seal

🦭 Video/Audio Downloader for Android, based on yt-dlp

  • View repository ↗
  • Kotlin
  • ★ 30,656
  • commit 7677f61a20fd
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

60/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

62/100

weak

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts16%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace5
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.01

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2022-041,496 · 0% AI
  2. 2022-057,338 · 0% AI
  3. 2022-067,577 · 0% AI
  4. 2022-071,218 · 0% AI
  5. 2022-083,452 · 0% AI
  6. 2022-091,681 · 0% AI
  7. 2022-101,305 · 0% AI
  8. 2022-113,881 · 0% AI
  9. 2022-123,555 · 0% AI
  10. 2023-017,445 · 0% AI
  11. 2023-024,412 · 0% AI
  12. 2023-031,463 · 0% AI
  13. 2023-04755 · 0% AI
  14. 2023-055,305 · 0% AI
  15. 2023-06173 · 0% AI
  16. 2023-07494 · 0% AI
  17. 2023-082,057 · 0% AI
  18. 2023-0946 · 0% AI
  19. 2023-101,340 · 0% AI
  20. 2023-116,373 · 0% AI
  21. 2023-12719 · 0% AI
  22. 2024-01969 · 0% AI
  23. 2024-02899 · 0% AI
  24. 2024-032,599 · 0% AI
  25. 2024-041,040 · 0% AI
  26. 2024-05361 · 0% AI
  27. 2024-061,335 · 0% AI
  28. 2024-071,140 · 0% AI
  29. 2024-086,656 · 0% AI
  30. 2024-096,242 · 0% AI
  31. 2024-1011,116 · 0% AI
  32. 2024-11910 · 0% AI
  33. 2024-120 · 0% AI
  34. 2025-010 · 0% AI
  35. 2025-020 · 0% AI
  36. 2025-030 · 0% AI
  37. 2025-0431 · 0% AI
  38. 2025-050 · 0% AI
  39. 2025-060 · 0% AI
  40. 2025-070 · 0% AI
  41. 2025-090 · 0% AI
  42. 2025-100 · 0% AI
  43. 2025-110 · 0% AI
  44. 2025-120 · 0% AI
  45. 2026-010 · 0% AI
  46. 2026-020 · 0% AI
  47. 2026-030 · 0% AI
  48. 2026-040 · 0% AI
  49. 2026-050 · 0% AI
  50. 2026-060 · 0% AI
  51. 2026-070 · 0% AI
  52. 2026-080 · 0% AI
  53. 2026-090 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
1,400
effective_loc
95,383
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok5 items
excluded_import_loc
6,491
flagged_loc
15,401
flagged_loc_share
17.3%
flagged_units
5
max_loc_per_hour
2,252.28
measured_loc
88,892
median_loc_per_hour
58.70
pr_timed_units
13
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
722
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
7,224
releases
99
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
1
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
1
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0.01
lines_scanned
34,550
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0.03
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

60 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 21% of function code in complex or long functions; 14% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity54
  • Duplication44
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI35
  • Documentation100
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
3
function_nloc
17,607
functions
836
long_functions
24
many_param_functions
32
mean_ccn
2.04
p90_ccn
4
risky_nloc_share
20.8%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
21,764
duplicated_lines
2,941
duplicated_share
13.5%
files
144
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
34,550
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok5 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/android.yml .github/workflows/android.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/android_ci.yml .github/workflows/android_ci.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/sponsor.yml .github/workflows/sponsor.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
5
cochange_commits
224
cochange_share
0.4%
source_lines
34,550
test_lines
27
test_ratio
0.00
Documentationok4 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
  • CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
yes
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
113
Type safetyskipped

Security

62 weak

Security posture is weak: 0 possible secret(s) in the tree, 1 only in history; 17 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

  • Secrets85
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows2
  • Security posture20
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
1
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
34,550
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
26
findings_high
17
findings_low
0
findings_medium
9
penalty
220.80
workflows
5
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
87.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok6 items
binary_assets
42
signals
2
suspicious
0

Findings

17 high10 medium

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:19 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:23 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:30 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android.yml:12 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android.yml:15 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android.yml:22 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android.yml:24 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android.yml:30 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android.yml:39 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:13 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:16 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:23 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:25 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml:10 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:13 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:16 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:23 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:18 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/android.yml:12 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/android.yml:8 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:13 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:8 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml:7 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:12 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:8 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium gitleaks/github-pat app/src/main/java/com/junkfood/seal/util/SponsorUtil.kt:13 Possible github-pat secret in history (commit e8c530bcb5); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.026
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-147677f61a20fdprov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6062

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JunkFood02/Seal/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JunkFood02/Seal/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JunkFood02/Seal/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JunkFood02/Seal/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JunkFood02/Seal/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JunkFood02/Seal/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/JunkFood02/Seal
  • Commit: 7677f61a20fda4210e84215fef9e9b51d25daa47
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T16:00:57+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 65% 100%
Code quality 60 weak 90% 100%
Security 62 weak 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 16.2%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 0.01 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2024-01 969 0%
2024-02 899 0%
2024-03 2,599 0%
2024-04 1,040 0%
2024-05 361 0%
2024-06 1,335 0%
2024-07 1,140 0%
2024-08 6,656 0%
2024-09 6,242 0%
2024-10 11,116 0%
2024-11 910 0%
2025-04 31 0%

Evidence

  • 3,700 lines of first-party code in ~1.6h (2,252 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (4f4696936a6f)
  • 2,770 lines of first-party code in ~2.5h (1,126 lines/hour, 4 commit session) (d8d27b630053)
  • 3,985 lines of first-party code in ~4.4h (906 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (722ae74dfda1)
  • 1,293 lines of first-party code in ~1.5h (876 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (7f7cd381028d)
  • 3,653 lines of first-party code in ~4.5h (807 lines/hour, 4 commit session) (04598a1b3fcf)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 21% of function code in complex or long functions; 14% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 54
Duplication 44
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 35
Documentation 100
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 836; mean complexity 2.0, 90th percentile 4; 3 complex and 24 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 13.5% of 21,764 compared
  • Tests: 27 test lines for 34,550 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: none

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is weak: 0 possible secret(s) in the tree, 1 only in history; 17 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 85
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 2
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 20
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:19
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:23
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:30
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android.yml:12
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android.yml:15
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android.yml:22
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android.yml:24
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android.yml:30
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android.yml:39
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:13
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:16
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:23
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:25
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml:10
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:13
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:16
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/sponsor.yml:23
medium gitleaks/github-pat: Possible github-pat secret in history (commit e8c530bcb5); removed from the current tree but still retrievable app/src/main/java/com/junkfood/seal/util/SponsorUtil.kt:13
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:18
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/Issue-Handler.yaml:11
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/android.yml:12
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/android.yml:8
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:13
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/android_ci.yml:8
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/close-stale-issues.yml:7

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 34,550; test lines: 27
Language Lines
Kotlin 34,577