Leaderboard github.com
Joxno/SimpleTicketSystem_AI_Tracer_1
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 41%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
62/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
75/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pacenot measured
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2026-083,065 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 2
- effective_loc
- 3,065
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 3,065
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 0
- measured_loc
- 0
- median_loc_per_hour
- 0
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 0
- work_units
- 0
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 3,065
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
62 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication74
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI0
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 1,589
- functions
- 114
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 2.63
- p90_ccn
- 6
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok4 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Config/BackupConfig.cs:3 and SimpleTicketSystem.AppHost/Config/BackupConfig.cs:3
- 6+ duplicated lines: SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Controllers/TicketsController.cs:123 and SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Controllers/TicketsController.cs:166
- 6+ duplicated lines: SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Mcp/TicketMcpTool.cs:41 and SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Mcp/TicketMcpTool.cs:73
- 6+ duplicated lines: SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Services/TicketService.cs:169 and SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Services/TicketService.cs:200
- compared_lines
- 1,712
- duplicated_lines
- 88
- duplicated_share
- 5.1%
- files
- 54
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 3,065
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 1
- cochange_share
- 0.0%
- source_lines
- 3,065
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 60
Type safetyskipped
Security
75 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 1 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)71
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 3
- findings_high
- 1
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 3,065
- weighted_findings
- 3.05
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 50.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
1 high2 medium
3 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user-entrypoint |
SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Dockerfile:19 | By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/csharp.lang.security.stacktrace-disclosure |
SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Program.cs:92 | Stacktrace information is displayed in a non-Development environment. Accidentally disclosing sensitive stack trace information in a production environment aids an attacker in reconnaissance and information gathering. [confidence high] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/dockerfile.security.secret-in-build-arg |
SimpleTicketSystem.Frontend/Dockerfile:14 | Docker build time arguments are not suited for secrets, because the argument values are saved with the image. Running `docker image history` on the image will show information on how the image was built, including arguments. If these... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 3 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 3008852a9993 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 62 | 75 |
| 2026-11-14 | 3008852a9993 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 62 | 75 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Joxno/SimpleTicketSystem_AI_Tracer_1
- Commit:
3008852a9993c94dcd528b7a05b08fe7a48d32ea - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 41% | 100% |
| Code quality | 62 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 75 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08 | 3,065 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 5% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 74 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 0 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 114; mean complexity 2.6, 90th percentile 6; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 5.1% of 1,712 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 3,065 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is adequate: 1 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 71 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/dockerfile.security.missing-user-entrypoint: By not specifying a USER, a program in the container may run as 'root'. This is a security hazard. If an attacker can control a process running as root, they may have control over the container. Ensure that the last USER in a Dockerfile is a USER other than 'root'. [confidence medium] |
SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Dockerfile:19 |
| medium | opengrep/csharp.lang.security.stacktrace-disclosure: Stacktrace information is displayed in a non-Development environment. Accidentally disclosing sensitive stack trace information in a production environment aids an attacker in reconnaissance and information gathering. [confidence high] |
SimpleTicketSystem.Api/Program.cs:92 |
| medium | opengrep/dockerfile.security.secret-in-build-arg: Docker build time arguments are not suited for secrets, because the argument values are saved with the image. Running docker image history on the image will show information on how the image was built, including arguments. If these contain plain text secrets, anyone with access to the docker image [confidence low] |
SimpleTicketSystem.Frontend/Dockerfile:14 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 3,065; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| C# | 3,046 |
| JavaScript | 19 |