RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

JingMatrix/Vector

Modern Xposed Framework

  • View repository ↗
  • Kotlin
  • ★ 13,154
  • commit 91e77e439619
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

<1%

possible

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

60/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 2 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts3%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace3
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.05

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
OpenAI Codex13832026-07-152026-07-15
Claude Code13152026-07-252026-07-25

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2014-0117 · 0% AI
  2. 2019-01134,065 · 0% AI
  3. 2019-022,055 · 0% AI
  4. 2019-039,690 · 0% AI
  5. 2019-041,586 · 0% AI
  6. 2019-058,025 · 0% AI
  7. 2019-062,923 · 0% AI
  8. 2019-070 · 0% AI
  9. 2019-0916 · 0% AI
  10. 2019-1038 · 0% AI
  11. 2019-1172 · 0% AI
  12. 2019-1237 · 0% AI
  13. 2020-01758 · 0% AI
  14. 2020-0210,666 · 0% AI
  15. 2020-032,615 · 0% AI
  16. 2020-041,030 · 0% AI
  17. 2020-0517 · 0% AI
  18. 2020-0671 · 0% AI
  19. 2020-07143 · 0% AI
  20. 2020-08343 · 0% AI
  21. 2020-0912 · 0% AI
  22. 2020-10277 · 0% AI
  23. 2020-113,967 · 0% AI
  24. 2020-1213,640 · 0% AI
  25. 2021-0142,096 · 0% AI
  26. 2021-0217,628 · 0% AI
  27. 2021-034,212 · 0% AI
  28. 2021-044,567 · 0% AI
  29. 2021-053,996 · 0% AI
  30. 2021-061,044 · 0% AI
  31. 2021-07814 · 0% AI
  32. 2021-083,965 · 0% AI
  33. 2021-093,061 · 0% AI
  34. 2021-102,779 · 0% AI
  35. 2021-115,375 · 0% AI
  36. 2021-121,053 · 0% AI
  37. 2022-011,254 · 0% AI
  38. 2022-022,065 · 0% AI
  39. 2022-031,812 · 0% AI
  40. 2022-041,947 · 0% AI
  41. 2022-05282 · 0% AI
  42. 2022-06103 · 0% AI
  43. 2022-0729 · 0% AI
  44. 2022-0823 · 0% AI
  45. 2022-0939 · 0% AI
  46. 2022-10366 · 0% AI
  47. 2022-11157 · 0% AI
  48. 2022-122,573 · 0% AI
  49. 2023-015,604 · 0% AI
  50. 2023-02810 · 0% AI
  51. 2023-03369 · 0% AI
  52. 2023-04111 · 0% AI
  53. 2023-0580 · 0% AI
  54. 2023-0685 · 0% AI
  55. 2023-07610 · 0% AI
  56. 2023-081,018 · 0% AI
  57. 2023-0941 · 0% AI
  58. 2023-10185 · 0% AI
  59. 2023-110 · 0% AI
  60. 2023-1274 · 0% AI
  61. 2024-01192 · 0% AI
  62. 2024-02188 · 0% AI
  63. 2024-054,210 · 0% AI
  64. 2024-061 · 0% AI
  65. 2024-072,402 · 0% AI
  66. 2024-08287 · 0% AI
  67. 2024-091,133 · 0% AI
  68. 2024-1066 · 0% AI
  69. 2024-11143 · 0% AI
  70. 2024-12265 · 0% AI
  71. 2025-01164 · 0% AI
  72. 2025-028 · 0% AI
  73. 2025-0388 · 0% AI
  74. 2025-040 · 0% AI
  75. 2025-0710 · 0% AI
  76. 2025-08588 · 0% AI
  77. 2025-0972 · 0% AI
  78. 2025-11113 · 0% AI
  79. 2026-01801 · 0% AI
  80. 2026-0274 · 0% AI
  81. 2026-0310,020 · 0% AI
  82. 2026-045,664 · 0% AI
  83. 2026-0731,106 · 2% AI
  84. 2026-0819,526 · 0% AI
  85. 2026-09484 · 0% AI
  86. 2026-10370 · 0% AI
  87. 2026-11995 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 75 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 65,603 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.000.03—
Security0.000.06—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok4 items
attributed_commit_share
0.1%
attributed_commits
2
attributed_loc
698
attributed_loc_share
0.2%
commits
3,072
effective_loc
381,260
tools_detected
2
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok3 items
excluded_import_loc
243,267
flagged_loc
10,299
flagged_loc_share
7.5%
flagged_units
3
max_loc_per_hour
3,403.24
measured_loc
137,993
median_loc_per_hour
55.50
pr_timed_units
86
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
13,485
pre_ai_era_bursts
5
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
69,355
work_units
1,755
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
2,138
releases
13
Coding styleok3 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
3
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
3
files:placeholder
0
index
0.05
lines_scanned
65,678
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.05
per_kloc:placeholder
0
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
75
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
376
other_lines
65,603
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:ai_per_kloc
0
quality:other_findings
2
quality:other_per_kloc
0.03
security:ai_findings
0
security:ai_per_kloc
0
security:other_findings
4
security:other_per_kloc
0.06

Code quality

60 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 11% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity71
  • Duplication84
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI15
  • Documentation65
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
23
function_nloc
27,702
functions
2,453
long_functions
14
many_param_functions
17
mean_ccn
2.51
p90_ccn
5
risky_nloc_share
11.4%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
43,095
duplicated_lines
1,244
duplicated_share
2.9%
files
376
Lintok
category:correctness
2
findings
2
scanned_lines
65,678
weighted_findings
0.50
Tests and CIok2 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/core.yml .github/workflows/core.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/crowdin.yml .github/workflows/crowdin.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
2
cochange_commits
209
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
65,678
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
82
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings; 15 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)97
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows5
  • Security posture60
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
1
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
6
findings_high
2
findings_low
0
findings_medium
4
parse_errors
11
scanned_lines
65,678
weighted_findings
5.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
21
findings_high
15
findings_low
2
findings_medium
4
penalty
178.20
workflows
2
Security postureok1 item
  • Dependency updates: .github/dependabot.yml .github/dependabot.yml
check:dependency_updates
yes
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
57.5%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
20
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

17 high8 medium5 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:103 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/core.yml:108 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:108 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:118 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:140 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:146 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:155 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:166 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:39 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/core.yml:71 code injection via template expansion [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:88 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/core.yml:94 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/core.yml:94 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:26 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:29 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml manager/tools/check_translations.py:1 The Python documentation recommends using `defusedxml` instead of `xml` because the native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause... Static analysis (opengrep)
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml-parse manager/tools/check_translations.py:6 The native Python `xml` library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. Do not use this library to parse untrusted input. Instead the... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown .github/dependabot.yml:11 insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown .github/dependabot.yml:19 insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown .github/dependabot.yml:3 insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:22 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.crypto.use-of-md5 legacy/src/main/java/de/robv/android/xposed/XSharedPreferences.java:250 Detected MD5 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. MD5 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Use HMAC instead. [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.crypto.use-of-md5 legacy/src/main/java/de/robv/android/xposed/XposedHelpers.java:1758 Detected MD5 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. MD5 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Use HMAC instead. [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity manager/src/debug/AndroidManifest.xml:18 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity manager/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:32 The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command zygisk/module/customize.sh:37 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command zygisk/module/customize.sh:40 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/core.yml:38 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:25 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key edxp-core/src/main/cpp/main/src/riru_hook.h:24 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit c362449e33); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4142
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.021
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4146
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1491e77e439619prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%6072

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JingMatrix/Vector/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JingMatrix/Vector/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JingMatrix/Vector/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JingMatrix/Vector/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JingMatrix/Vector/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JingMatrix/Vector/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/JingMatrix/Vector
  • Commit: 91e77e439619bdee53c106ba9c82b9e08051c3e9
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T15:58:32+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 65% 100%
Code quality 60 weak 90% 100%
Security 72 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 2 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.2%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 2.7%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.2%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
OpenAI Codex 1 383
Claude Code 1 315

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 75 of 65,678.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 0.05 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 3, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2025-08 588 0%
2025-09 72 0%
2025-11 113 0%
2026-01 801 0%
2026-02 74 0%
2026-03 10,020 0%
2026-04 5,664 0%
2026-07 31,106 2%
2026-08 19,526 0%
2026-09 484 0%
2026-10 370 0%
2026-11 995 0%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: PR description attribution (7fd88c9ecd5f)
  • OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/fix-module-repo-loader' (2a633ef0943f)
  • 3,735 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (934 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (5d782a768036)
  • 4,182 lines of first-party code in ~4.6h (906 lines/hour, 3 commit session) (17625a04d5cd)
  • 2,382 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (596 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (779faeb5ee92)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // First, check if it exists. If not, we need to "discover" it. (daemon/src/m)
  • step-by-step narration comment: * first, and someone who keeps two and switches between them should not be offered a shortcut (manager/src/)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // first, because findLibrary answers with the first candidate it can open. (xposed/src/m)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 11% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 71
Duplication 84
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 15
Documentation 65
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 2,453; mean complexity 2.5, 90th percentile 5; 23 complex and 14 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 2.9% of 43,095 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 65,678 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings; 15 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 97
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 5
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 60
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: dependency updates, signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml: The Python documentation recommends using defusedxml instead of xml because the native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. [confidence low] manager/tools/check_translations.py:1
high opengrep/python.lang.security.use-defused-xml-parse: The native Python xml library is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. These attacks can leak confidential data and "XML bombs" can cause denial of service. Do not use this library to parse untrusted input. Instead the Python documentation recommends using defusedxml. [confidence medium] manager/tools/check_translations.py:6
high zizmor/template-injection: code injection via template expansion [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:71
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:39
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:88
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:94
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:103
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:108
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:118
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:140
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:146
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:155
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/core.yml:166
high zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] .github/workflows/core.yml:94
high zizmor/cache-poisoning: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] .github/workflows/core.yml:108
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:26
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:29
medium opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.crypto.use-of-md5: Detected MD5 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. MD5 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Use HMAC instead. [confidence high] legacy/src/main/java/de/robv/android/xposed/XSharedPreferences.java:250
medium opengrep/java.lang.security.audit.crypto.use-of-md5: Detected MD5 hash algorithm which is considered insecure. MD5 is not collision resistant and is therefore not suitable as a cryptographic signature. Use HMAC instead. [confidence high] legacy/src/main/java/de/robv/android/xposed/XposedHelpers.java:1758
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] manager/src/debug/AndroidManifest.xml:18
medium opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] manager/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:32
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown: insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] .github/dependabot.yml:3
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown: insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] .github/dependabot.yml:11
medium zizmor/dependabot-cooldown: insufficient cooldown in Dependabot updates [confidence high] .github/dependabot.yml:19
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] .github/workflows/crowdin.yml:22

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 65,678; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Kotlin 49,526
Java 8,610
C++ 5,214
C 2,101
Shell 160
Python 67