Leaderboard github.com

JakeDot/0x33bd

0x33bd - Sales Rounding BigDecimal for Java and JS

View repository ↗
JavaScript
★ 0
commit 9fe1bb32ceda
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

95%

explicit

Confidence: 82%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

72/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

82/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

95% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 95% of first-party code added; an estimated 95% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share95%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share95%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)3.00

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
GitHub Copilot coding agent	37	2,196	2026-03-14	2026-03-16
Jules	1	114	2026-08-16	2026-08-16

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-032,310 · 95% AI
2026-08114 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 414 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 100 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.00	—
Security	0.00	0.00	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok27 items

attributed_commit_share: 79.2%
attributed_commits: 38
attributed_loc: 2,310
attributed_loc_share: 95.3%
commits: 48
effective_loc: 2,424
tools_detected: 2

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 886
measured_loc: 2,424
median_loc_per_hour: 167.22
pr_timed_units: 9
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 16

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 6
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 1
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 3
lines_scanned: 514
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 6
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 414
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 8
other_lines: 100
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 0
quality:other_per_kloc: 0
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 0
security:other_per_kloc: 0

Code quality

72 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.02, no CI test run detected; 36% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity34
Duplication100
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI70
Documentation65
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok2 items

complex_functions: 2
function_nloc: 174
functions: 23
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 3.39
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 35.6%

Duplication (jscpd)ok

compared_lines: 332
duplicated_lines: 0
duplicated_share: 0.0%
files: 8

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 514
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok1 item

CI config: .github/workflows/cleanup-copilot-branches.yml .github/workflows/cleanup-copilot-branches.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: yes
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 1
cochange_commits: 22
cochange_share: 36.4%
source_lines: 514
test_lines: 526
test_ratio: 1.02

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 137

Type safetyskipped

Security

82 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 1 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)100
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflows82
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 0
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 1
scanned_lines: 514
weighted_findings: 0

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 1
findings_high: 1
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
penalty: 12
workflows: 1

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 14.6%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 high

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/cleanup-copilot-branches.yml:16	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	1
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`9fe1bb32ceda`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	95%	72	82
2026-11-14	`9fe1bb32ceda`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	95%	72	82

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/JakeDot/0x33bd
Commit: 9fe1bb32ceda4a4e96387c6367e7ffac0191df1c
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	95	explicit	82%	100%
Code quality	72	adequate	90%	100%
Security	82	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 95% of first-party code added; an estimated 95% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 95.3%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 95.3%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
GitHub Copilot coding agent	37	2,196
Jules	1	114

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 414 of 514.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Stylometry index: 3.00 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 6). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-03	2,310	95%
2026-08	114	100%

Evidence

Jules: author google-labs-jules[bot] (9fe1bb32ceda)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (8070877bf4e3)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (79e9da094963)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (6ff8c02c8700)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (d1ad4c1e1b81)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (b45092d65ba0)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (dc4d20e4d73a)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (8c43f6e1bf8a)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (affe83fea02b)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (27c810cdfe32)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (bdb61f563e97)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (be21160c564f)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (7b79f5ae500c)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (7a94f5d3eb30)
GitHub Copilot coding agent: author copilot-swe-agent[bot] (3196ba8a0a8c)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 1.02, no CI test run detected; 36% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	34
Duplication	100
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	70
Documentation	65
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 23; mean complexity 3.4, 90th percentile 5; 2 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 332 compared
Tests: 526 test lines for 514 source lines (ratio 1.02); CI test commands: none detected; 36% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 1 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	82
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/cleanup-copilot-branches.yml:16

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 514; test lines: 526

Language	Lines
JavaScript	478
Java	472
Kotlin	57
Shell	33