Leaderboard github.com

Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone

Fully vibe coded splitwise clone using Claude Code

View repository ↗
Java
★ 0
commit b01f6bf364e0
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence: 75%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

69/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

79/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share100%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share100%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pacenot measured
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	17	2,898	2026-02-24	2026-02-24

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-022,898 · 100% AI
2026-040 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 2,743 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	—	—
Security	0.00	—	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok18 items

attributed_commit_share: 89.5%
attributed_commits: 17
attributed_loc: 2,898
attributed_loc_share: 100.0%
commits: 19
effective_loc: 2,898
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok1 item

.claude/settings.local.json (claude-code configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2026-02-24
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 0
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 308.83
measured_loc: 2,898
median_loc_per_hour: 207.82
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 3

Release velocityskipped

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 2,743
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 2,743
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 40
other_lines: 0
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 0
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 0

Code quality

69 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.05, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

How the score is built

Complexity100
Duplication91
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI31
Documentation20
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok

complex_functions: 0
function_nloc: 1,430
functions: 155
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.20
p90_ccn: 5
risky_nloc_share: 0.0%

Duplication (jscpd)ok1 item

6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/budgetapp/ui/recurring/AddRecurringDialog.java:77 and app/src/main/java/com/budgetapp/ui/transaction/AddTransactionDialog.java:147

compared_lines: 1,587
duplicated_lines: 24
duplicated_share: 1.5%
files: 40

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 2,743
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok

check:ci_present: no
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 0
cochange_commits: 14
cochange_share: 21.4%
source_lines: 2,743
test_lines: 143
test_ratio: 0.05

Documentationok1 item

README.md README.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: no
check:readme: no
readme_lines: 2

Type safetyskipped

Security

79 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets100
Static analysis (SAST)93
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflowsnot measured
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 1
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 1
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 2,743
weighted_findings: 0.60

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)skipped

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 0.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

1 medium

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
medium	`opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity`	app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:17	The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access...	Static analysis (opengrep)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	skipped	`—`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	1
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	0

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`b01f6bf364e0`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	100%	69	79
2026-11-14	`b01f6bf364e0`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	100%	69	79

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/Infintesky/Splitwise-Clone
Commit: b01f6bf364e0692083551f8a3eb70ea4789013ad
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	100	explicit	75%	100%
Code quality	69	adequate	90%	100%
Security	79	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	17	2,898

AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 2,743 of 2,743.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-02	2,898	100%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (49a3d66238f5)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e14ca7ca7b1b)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3d7d14cf324a)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a093ea3c1cdb)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (95c88abee706)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a16882036f63)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (a937824110fa)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7fcdeb4f46c2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bed325148183)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4c5626d49417)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (150c14115ec8)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bfff049ae1af)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3d585427f6a0)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (8d5e94e4d35e)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (df3a3a7090ae)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.05, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	100
Duplication	91
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	31
Documentation	20
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 155; mean complexity 2.2, 90th percentile 5; 0 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 1.5% of 1,587 compared
Tests: 143 test lines for 2,743 source lines (ratio 0.05); CI test commands: none detected; 21% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: readme, license, contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	100
Static analysis (Opengrep)	93
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
medium	`opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity`: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium]	app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:17

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 2,743; test lines: 143

Language	Lines
Java	2,886