RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician

WechatMagician is a Xposed module written in Kotlin, that allows you to completely control your Wechat.

  • View repository ↗
  • Kotlin
  • ★ 1,894
  • commit ec319f9d38d1
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

75/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

82/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2017-01523 · 0% AI
  2. 2017-0248 · 0% AI
  3. 2017-03212 · 0% AI
  4. 2017-0452 · 0% AI
  5. 2017-05141 · 0% AI
  6. 2017-06136 · 0% AI
  7. 2017-0719 · 0% AI
  8. 2017-08101 · 0% AI
  9. 2017-092,048 · 0% AI
  10. 2017-104,448 · 0% AI
  11. 2017-11779 · 0% AI
  12. 2017-123,200 · 0% AI
  13. 2018-011,544 · 0% AI
  14. 2018-023,703 · 0% AI
  15. 2018-032,290 · 0% AI
  16. 2018-04207 · 0% AI
  17. 2018-0530 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
738
effective_loc
19,481
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
249.13
measured_loc
19,481
median_loc_per_hour
53
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
19,481
work_units
208
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
422.60
releases
25
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
3,840
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

75 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.02, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication86
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI37
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
1,994
functions
213
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
2.14
p90_ccn
4
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok4 items
compared_lines
2,146
duplicated_lines
52
duplicated_share
2.4%
files
50
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
3,840
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
248
cochange_share
2.0%
source_lines
3,840
test_lines
73
test_ratio
0.02
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
61
Type safetyskipped

Security

82 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
3,840
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
3.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
10
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

No line-level findings.

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14ec319f9d38d1prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7582
2026-11-14ec319f9d38d1prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%7582

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Gh0u1L5/WechatMagician/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 75 adequate 90% 100%
Security 82 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2017-06 136 0%
2017-07 19 0%
2017-08 101 0%
2017-09 2,048 0%
2017-10 4,448 0%
2017-11 779 0%
2017-12 3,200 0%
2018-01 1,544 0%
2018-02 3,703 0%
2018-03 2,290 0%
2018-04 207 0%
2018-05 30 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.02, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 86
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 37
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 213; mean complexity 2.1, 90th percentile 4; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 2.4% of 2,146 compared
  • Tests: 73 test lines for 3,840 source lines (ratio 0.02); CI test commands: none detected; 2% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 3,840; test lines: 73
Language Lines
Kotlin 3,913