Leaderboard github.com

GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links

Render Obsidian wikilinks to citekeys as formatted citations.

View repository ↗
TypeScript
★ 2
commit 3432c1ab6272
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

100%

explicit

Confidence: 75%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

92/100

strong

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

64/100

weak

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

100% explicit

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share100%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
Estimated AI-generated share100%
AI tool configuration files1
Work sessions at AI pace0
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
Claude Code	19	6,246	2026-09-16	2026-10-29

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2026-095,341 · 100% AI
2026-10905 · 100% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 3,993 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 0 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	—	—
Security	2.25	—	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok20 items

attributed_commit_share: 95.0%
attributed_commits: 19
attributed_loc: 6,246
attributed_loc_share: 100.0%
commits: 20
effective_loc: 6,246
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok1 item

AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration)

artifacts: 1
earliest_adoption: 2026-09-16
tools_configured: 1
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok

excluded_import_loc: 2,489
flagged_loc: 0
flagged_loc_share: 0.0%
flagged_units: 0
max_loc_per_hour: 341.50
measured_loc: 3,757
median_loc_per_hour: 219.24
pr_timed_units: 0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 6

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 2,295.40
releases: 3

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0
lines_scanned: 3,993
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 3,993
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 33
other_lines: 0
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 0
security:ai_findings: 9
security:ai_per_kloc: 2.25
security:other_findings: 0

Code quality

92 strong

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.50, CI runs tests; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

How the score is built

Complexity96
Duplication100
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI90
Documentation65
Type safety100
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok1 item

update in src/editor/viewPlugin.ts: complexity 18, 33 lines

complex_functions: 1
function_nloc: 2,344
functions: 263
long_functions: 0
many_param_functions: 0
mean_ccn: 2.69
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 1.4%

Duplication (jscpd)ok

compared_lines: 2,734
duplicated_lines: 0
duplicated_share: 0.0%
files: 33

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 3,993
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok3 items

CI config: .github/workflows/lint.yml .github/workflows/lint.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
CI runs tests (npm test, vitest)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: yes
ci_files: 2
cochange_commits: 11
cochange_share: 63.6%
source_lines: 3,993
test_lines: 1,981
test_ratio: 0.50

Documentationok2 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE LICENSE

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: no
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 164

Type safetyok1 item

TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json tsconfig.json

check:low_escape_density: yes
check:strict_config: yes
escapes: 0
escapes_per_kloc: 0

Security

64 weak

Security posture is weak: 17 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies; 6 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets90
Static analysis (SAST)95
Vulnerable dependencies57
CI workflows33
Security posture0
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 16
declared: 16
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 3

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 9
findings_high: 0
findings_low: 9
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 0
scanned_lines: 3,993
weighted_findings: 0.56

Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok

penalty: 34
vulnerabilities: 17
vulnerable_packages: 8
vulns_critical: 0
vulns_high: 2
vulns_low: 3
vulns_medium: 12
vulns_unknown: 0

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 9
findings_high: 6
findings_low: 2
findings_medium: 1
penalty: 66.60
workflows: 2

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: no
signed_commit_share: 5.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok

binary_assets: 0
signals: 0
suspicious: 0

Findings

8 high13 medium17 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/lint.yml:20	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/lint.yml:22	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:16	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`	.github/workflows/release.yml:19	runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:19	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/release.yml:36	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/lint.yml:10	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`osv/GHSA-4p3w-j4w9-5jqw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4p3w-j4w9-5jqw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-qxg6-89mg-rqv8`	package-lock.json	@vitest/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qxg6-89mg-rqv8	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
medium	`osv/GHSA-xp26-3454-mjgp`	package-lock.json	@vitest/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xp26-3454-mjgp	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/lint.yml:20	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/release.yml:16	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
low	`osv/GHSA-333x-w4r6-6crp`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-333x-w4r6-6crp	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-9jrq-w75r-8gcw	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`osv/GHSA-xhq7-xmqj-769h`	package-lock.json	[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xhq7-xmqj-769h	Dependencies (osv-scanner)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/index.ts:198	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/index.ts:218	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/index.ts:251	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/index.ts:280	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/index.ts:292	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/loader.ts:149	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/bibliography/loader.ts:162	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/notes.ts:64	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/parser/link.test.ts:7	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/render/formatter.test.ts:53	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`	src/render/formatter.ts:176	Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string....	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	test/fixtures/bibliography.json:22	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-4`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	9
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	ok	`osv-scanner version: 2.7.1`	17
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	9
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	3

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`3432c1ab6272`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	100%	92	64
2026-11-14	`3432c1ab6272`	`prov-4+qual-2+sec-2`	100%	92	64

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/GerritKruse/obsidian-citation-links
Commit: 3432c1ab627280923a8dccdf0ecd6942918dd16c
Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	100	explicit	75%	100%
Code quality	92	strong	90%	100%
Security	64	weak	85%	100%

AI provenance

Explicit AI attribution on 100% of first-party code added; an estimated 100% including velocity signals.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 100.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
Estimated AI-generated share: 100.0%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
Claude Code	19	6,246

AI tooling configured in repo: generic-agent

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 3,993 of 3,993.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2026-09	5,341	100%
2026-10	905	100%

Evidence

Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3432c1ab6272)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (9cff01256f43)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2bb1916004dd)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (de857c6ab0b8)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (65c1c825d7bd)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f71e6a18cc8c)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (ebaf640582dc)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4b353a670b9e)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (68cd0f1ba6c2)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c2d88da84c58)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (fa0c05907527)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (fc3608b7261e)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (7e3387bf0293)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4ee4d59f902d)
Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (65c0ec4e9f93)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.50, CI runs tests; 1% of function code in complex or long functions; 0% duplicated lines. Weakest area: docs.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	96
Duplication	100
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	90
Documentation	65
Type safety	100
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 263; mean complexity 2.7, 90th percentile 6; 1 complex and 0 long functions
Duplicated lines: 0.0% of 2,734 compared
Tests: 1,981 test lines for 3,993 source lines (ratio 0.50); CI test commands: npm test, vitest; 64% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

update in src/editor/viewPlugin.ts: complexity 18, 33 lines

Security

Security posture is weak: 17 known vulnerabilities in 8 dependencies; 6 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	90
Static analysis (Opengrep)	95
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	57
CI workflows (zizmor)	33
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	0
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Known vulnerabilities: 17 in 8 packages (critical 0, high 2, medium 12, low 3)
Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`osv/GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-68fv-2mgg-jv7q	package-lock.json
high	`osv/GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-587h-7wmj-h5pm	package-lock.json
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/lint.yml:20
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/lint.yml:22
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:16
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:19
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/release.yml:36
high	`zizmor/cache-poisoning`: runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low]	.github/workflows/release.yml:19
medium	`osv/GHSA-qxg6-89mg-rqv8`: @vitest/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-qxg6-89mg-rqv8	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-xp26-3454-mjgp`: @vitest/[email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-xp26-3454-mjgp	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-4p3w-j4w9-5jqw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-4p3w-j4w9-5jqw	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-698v-4r3x-3vcv	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-r825-w8mm-5pxw	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-rq7h-c2jc-7f22	package-lock.json
medium	`osv/GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg`: [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg	package-lock.json
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`: overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	.github/workflows/lint.yml:10
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	src/parser/link.test.ts:7
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	test/fixtures/bibliography.json:22
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file)	src/render/formatter.test.ts:53
low	`opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-formatstring`: Detected string concatenation with a non-literal variable in a util.format / console.log function. If an attacker injects a format specifier in the string, it will forge the log message. Try to use constant values for the format string. [confidence low]	src/bibliography/index.ts:198

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

Source lines: 3,993; test lines: 1,981

Language	Lines
TypeScript	5,903
JavaScript	71