RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

FuelLabs/fuels-rs

Fuel Network Rust SDK

  • View repository ↗
  • Rust
  • ★ 42,938
  • commit f5191b6aab3d
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

<1%

possible

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

77/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 1 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.06

Attributed AI tools

ToolCommitsLines addedFirst seenLast seen
Claude Code11842026-04-062026-04-06

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2021-100 · 0% AI
  2. 2021-115,329 · 0% AI
  3. 2021-121,504 · 0% AI
  4. 2022-011,085 · 0% AI
  5. 2022-022,160 · 0% AI
  6. 2022-031,751 · 0% AI
  7. 2022-041,484 · 0% AI
  8. 2022-052,101 · 0% AI
  9. 2022-067,332 · 0% AI
  10. 2022-074,691 · 0% AI
  11. 2022-086,663 · 0% AI
  12. 2022-098,056 · 0% AI
  13. 2022-108,913 · 0% AI
  14. 2022-114,613 · 0% AI
  15. 2022-122,446 · 0% AI
  16. 2023-0111,496 · 0% AI
  17. 2023-022,321 · 0% AI
  18. 2023-037,235 · 0% AI
  19. 2023-042,754 · 0% AI
  20. 2023-051,671 · 0% AI
  21. 2023-06745 · 0% AI
  22. 2023-071,271 · 0% AI
  23. 2023-081,577 · 0% AI
  24. 2023-093,198 · 0% AI
  25. 2023-103,850 · 0% AI
  26. 2023-113,128 · 0% AI
  27. 2023-12262 · 0% AI
  28. 2024-011,417 · 0% AI
  29. 2024-021,974 · 0% AI
  30. 2024-032,402 · 0% AI
  31. 2024-043,213 · 0% AI
  32. 2024-052,494 · 0% AI
  33. 2024-062,892 · 0% AI
  34. 2024-071,486 · 0% AI
  35. 2024-082,078 · 0% AI
  36. 2024-09142 · 0% AI
  37. 2024-101,906 · 0% AI
  38. 2024-1118 · 0% AI
  39. 2024-122,518 · 0% AI
  40. 2025-011,520 · 0% AI
  41. 2025-021,874 · 0% AI
  42. 2025-033,256 · 0% AI
  43. 2025-04816 · 0% AI
  44. 2025-051,116 · 0% AI
  45. 2025-0687 · 0% AI
  46. 2025-07102 · 0% AI
  47. 2025-08187 · 0% AI
  48. 2025-09213 · 0% AI
  49. 2025-10468 · 0% AI
  50. 2026-032 · 0% AI
  51. 2026-04193 · 95% AI
  52. 2026-0630 · 0% AI
  53. 2026-10124 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 139 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 31,496 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 linesAI-attributedOtherRatio
Code quality0.000.06—
Security0.000.00—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok2 items
attributed_commit_share
0.1%
attributed_commits
1
attributed_loc
184
attributed_loc_share
0.1%
commits
903
effective_loc
130,164
tools_detected
1
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
10,442
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
288.24
measured_loc
119,722
median_loc_per_hour
2.06
pr_timed_units
627
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
628
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
774.60
releases
99
Coding styleok1 item
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
1
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
1
index
0.06
lines_scanned
31,635
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0.03
Findings in AI-written linesok
ai_lines
139
blame_failures
0
files_blamed
181
other_lines
31,496
quality:ai_findings
0
quality:ai_per_kloc
0
quality:other_findings
2
quality:other_per_kloc
0.06
security:ai_findings
0
security:ai_per_kloc
0
security:other_findings
0
security:other_per_kloc
0

Code quality

77 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.45, no CI test run detected; 7% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.

How the score is built

  • Complexity82
  • Duplication57
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI77
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
7
function_nloc
20,322
functions
1,601
long_functions
5
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
2.15
p90_ccn
4
risky_nloc_share
6.6%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
21,057
duplicated_lines
1,969
duplicated_share
9.3%
files
181
Lintok
category:correctness
2
findings
2
scanned_lines
31,635
weighted_findings
0.50
Tests and CIok4 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/docs.yml .github/workflows/docs.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml
  • CI runs linters (clippy, rustfmt)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
yes
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
yes
ci_files
3
cochange_commits
205
cochange_share
57.6%
source_lines
31,635
test_lines
14,162
test_ratio
0.45
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
73
Type safetyskipped

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 35 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflows0
  • Security posture60
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok
checked
68
declared
68
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
1
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
31,635
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
55
findings_high
35
findings_low
8
findings_medium
12
penalty
415.80
workflows
3
Security postureok15 items
  • Security policy: SECURITY.md SECURITY.md
  • Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) Cargo.toml
  • e2e/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) e2e/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels-accounts/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels-accounts/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels-code-gen/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels-code-gen/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels-core/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels-core/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels-macros/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels-macros/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels-programs/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels-programs/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels-test-helpers/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels-test-helpers/Cargo.toml
  • packages/fuels/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) packages/fuels/Cargo.toml
  • scripts/change-log/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) scripts/change-log/Cargo.toml
  • scripts/check-docs/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) scripts/check-docs/Cargo.toml
  • scripts/fuel-core-version/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) scripts/fuel-core-version/Cargo.toml
  • scripts/versions-replacer/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) scripts/versions-replacer/Cargo.toml
  • wasm-tests/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) wasm-tests/Cargo.toml
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
no
check:security_policy
yes
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
100.0%
unpinned_manifests
14
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

35 high12 medium9 low2 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:106 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/ci.yml:110 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:110 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:130 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:140 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:142 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:147 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:196 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:199 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/ci.yml:205 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:205 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:213 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:224 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:232 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:236 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/ci.yml:248 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:248 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:275 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:287 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:289 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/ci.yml:297 code injection via template expansion [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:299 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:33 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:35 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/cache-poisoning .github/workflows/ci.yml:38 runtime artifacts potentially vulnerable to a cache poisoning attack [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:38 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:66 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:79 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:91 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/docs.yml:13 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:14 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:17 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:24 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:39 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:59 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:1 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:103 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:136 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:153 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/ci.yml:244 code injection via template expansion [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:277 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:30 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:73 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/ci.yml:88 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/docs.yml:12 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence medium] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:14 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command .github/workflows/scripts/verify_tag.sh:28 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-command-substitution-in-command ci_checks.sh:20 The result of command substitution $(...) or `...`, if unquoted, is split on whitespace or other separators specified by the IFS variable. You should surround it with double quotes to avoid splitting the result. Lint
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:139 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:195 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:286 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:33 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:78 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:91 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key packages/fuels/tests/storage/contract_storage_test/out/debug/contract_storage_test-storage_slots.json:3 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit f79b458a11); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:54 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml:55 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Findings in AI-written linesAI provenanceokgit-blame0
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4142
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.055
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14f5191b6aab3dprov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7772

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-rs
  • Commit: f5191b6aab3d553ce2348234015e3523b46beb1e
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T15:42:26+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 65% 100%
Code quality 77 adequate 90% 100%
Security 72 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 1 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.1%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.1%
AI tool Attributed commits Lines added
Claude Code 1 184

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 139 of 31,635.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

  • Stylometry index: 0.06 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 1, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2025-03 3,256 0%
2025-04 816 0%
2025-05 1,116 0%
2025-06 87 0%
2025-07 102 0%
2025-08 187 0%
2025-09 213 0%
2025-10 468 0%
2026-03 2 0%
2026-04 193 95%
2026-06 30 0%
2026-10 124 0%

Evidence

  • Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (a12583268412)
  • placeholder or demo-only phrasing: // Replace with your own JSON abi path (relative to the root of your crate) (examples/rus)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.45, no CI test run detected; 7% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 82
Duplication 57
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 77
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 1,601; mean complexity 2.1, 90th percentile 4; 7 complex and 5 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 9.3% of 21,057 compared
  • Tests: 14,162 test lines for 31,635 source lines (ratio 0.45); CI test commands: none detected; 58% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 35 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) 0
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 60
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: security policy, signed commits; missing: dependency updates, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/template-injection: code injection via template expansion [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:297
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:33
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:35
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:38
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:66
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:79
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:91
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:106
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:110
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:130
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:140
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:142
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:147
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:196
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:199
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:205
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:213
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:224
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:232
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:236
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:248
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:275
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:287
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:289
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:299

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 31,635; test lines: 14,162
Language Lines
Rust 45,742
Shell 55