RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0

🎬 A powerful, intuitive IPTV streaming app supporting M3U playlists, EPG, and community lists. Available for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android & TV Boxes.

  • View repository ↗
  • Rust
  • ★ 266
  • commit de18da661630
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

suspicious-distribution

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
48%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

58/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

91/100

strong

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts100%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace1
  • Releases at AI pacenot measured
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2026-11173,512 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
30
effective_loc
173,512
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok1 item
excluded_import_loc
0
flagged_loc
173,512
flagged_loc_share
100.0%
flagged_units
1
max_loc_per_hour
42,983.98
measured_loc
173,512
median_loc_per_hour
42,983.98
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
0
work_units
1
Release velocityskipped
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0
lines_scanned
30,679
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

58 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity100
  • Duplication60
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation65
  • Type safety40
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok
complex_functions
0
function_nloc
96,272
functions
22,435
long_functions
0
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
1.31
p90_ccn
2
risky_nloc_share
0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok7 items
compared_lines
115,886
duplicated_lines
9,887
duplicated_share
8.5%
files
9
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
173,512
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
9
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
173,512
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
191
Type safetyok
check:low_escape_density
yes
check:strict_config
no
escapes
0
escapes_per_kloc
0

Security

91 strong

Security posture is strong: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets97
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture60
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
1
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
9
scanned_lines
173,512
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok1 item
  • Security policy: security.md security.md
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
yes
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
100.0%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok4 items
  • links to file hosts or shorteners: dropbox.com/s README.md
  • gives an archive password README.md
  • 266 stars in 1 days (266/day)
  • owner account is 43 days old with 266 stars on this repo
binary_assets
0
signals
3
suspicious
1

Findings

1 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
low gitleaks/generic-api-key api.py:46 Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceskipped—0
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityok—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.11

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14de18da661630prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5891

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Feathershosmash/IPTV_Player2.0/)
Full text report

Scores

Caution: signals consistent with a malware lure. This repository appears to exist mainly to distribute a download (see Distribution signals below). Do not run its release files without independent verification.

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 48% 100%
Code quality 58 weak 90% 100%
Security 91 strong 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 100.0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2026-11 173,512 0%

Evidence

  • 173,512 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (42,984 lines/hour, 9 commit session) (723cde2f3d81)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 100
Duplication 60
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 65
Type safety 40
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 22,435; mean complexity 1.3, 90th percentile 2; 0 complex and 0 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 8.5% of 115,886 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 173,512 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Security

Security posture is strong: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 97
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 60
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: security policy, signed commits, lockfiles; missing: dependency updates

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
low gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree api.py:46

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

  • readme-download-lure: links to file hosts or shorteners: dropbox.com/s
  • readme-download-lure: gives an archive password
  • star-burst: 266 stars in 1 days (266/day)
  • new-owner: owner account is 43 days old with 266 stars on this repo

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 173,512; test lines: 0
Language Lines
Rust 72,456
C 49,324
Go 44,934
Python 6,798