EdenLabs/agentic-renderdoc
An MCP server and RenderDoc extension that allows AI agents to inspect and interact with a live captures
unreviewed-ai-risk
- Repository: https://github.com/EdenLabs/agentic-renderdoc
- Commit:
2abcc5530656603375fff4eef90f1ab44f113fdf - Generated: 2026-11-13T23:47:44+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-4+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
Unreviewed AI code risk: a large share of this code is explicitly AI-attributed, and its tests or review process are weak while quality or security scores are low.
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 99 | explicit | 73% | 100% |
| Code quality | 41 | poor | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 75 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Explicit AI attribution on 99% of first-party code added; an estimated 99% including velocity signals.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 98.8%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 98.8%
| AI tool | Attributed commits | Lines added |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | 13 | 8,547 |
Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 7,362 of 7,466.
Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.
- Stylometry index: 0.40 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 3, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02 | 4,882 | 100% |
| 2026-03 | 820 | 100% |
| 2026-04 | 2,211 | 100% |
| 2026-05 | 634 | 100% |
| 2026-09 | 105 | 0% |
Evidence
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (2abcc5530656)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (62ca9e29726d)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (f0d9ba618951)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-authored-by: Claude' (d62de7adcd39)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3aad81b6bfaa)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (0f92a8d1af87)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (c8f1133c9509)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e685db8b8a52)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (e45db9ffb9f0)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (3a0973649518)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (4d64ade1344a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (5b494ccef40a)
- Claude Code: trailer 'Co-Authored-By: Claude' (bd80606ab1ef)
- 2,002 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (500 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (3aad81b6bfaa)
- step-by-step narration comment: # Step 1: ask the bridge to shut down via the protocol if it's (src/server/c)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is poor: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 20% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 55 |
| Duplication | 80 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 42 |
| Tests and CI | 4 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 0 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 258; mean complexity 4.2, 90th percentile 11; 9 complex and 3 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 3.6% of 5,616 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 7,466 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 9% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- shader_reflection in src/extension/serialize.py: complexity 34, 121 lines
- _decode_texture in src/server/tools.py: complexity 25, 69 lines
- pipeline_state in src/extension/serialize.py: complexity 24, 156 lines
- main in src/extension/embedded_headless.py: complexity 21, 78 lines
- make_describe_draw.make_describe_draw.describe_draw._describe in src/extension/utilities.py: complexity 19, 82 lines
Security
Security posture is adequate: 5 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 81 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_call' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
package.py:50 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_call' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/install.py:27 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'check_call' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
scripts/install.py:41 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/extension/headless.py:210 |
| high | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.dangerous-subprocess-use-audit: Detected subprocess function 'Popen' without a static string. If this data can be controlled by a malicious actor, it may be an instance of command injection. Audit the use of this call to ensure it is not controllable by an external resource. You may consider using 'shlex.escape()'. [confidence low] |
src/server/client.py:704 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.exec-detected: Detected the use of exec(). exec() can be dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content. If this content can be input from outside the program, this may be a code injection vulnerability. Ensure evaluated content is not definable by external sources. [confidence low] |
src/extension/handlers.py:409 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.eval-detected: Detected the use of eval(). eval() can be dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content. If this content can be input from outside the program, this may be a code injection vulnerability. Ensure evaluated content is not definable by external sources. [confidence low] |
src/extension/handlers.py:410 |
| medium | opengrep/python.lang.security.audit.exec-detected: Detected the use of exec(). exec() can be dangerous if used to evaluate dynamic content. If this content can be input from outside the program, this may be a code injection vulnerability. Ensure evaluated content is not definable by external sources. [confidence low] |
src/extension/handlers.py:412 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 7,466; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Python | 7,466 |