Leaderboard github.com

DevToys-app/DevToys

A Swiss Army knife for developers.

View repository ↗
C#
★ 32,273
commit 2dbbc8aa5949
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

possible

Confidence: 65%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

61/100

weak

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

43/100

poor

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts7%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace3
Releases at AI pace0
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.01

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2021-0911,743 · 0% AI
2021-1015,763 · 0% AI
2021-115,474 · 0% AI
2021-124,059 · 0% AI
2022-0111,979 · 0% AI
2022-021,301 · 0% AI
2022-032,976 · 0% AI
2022-04130 · 0% AI
2022-051,220 · 0% AI
2022-06826 · 0% AI
2022-071,562 · 0% AI
2022-0856 · 0% AI
2022-094,379 · 0% AI
2022-100 · 0% AI
2022-120 · 0% AI
2023-0117,586 · 0% AI
2023-027,403 · 0% AI
2023-034,139 · 0% AI
2023-047,005 · 0% AI
2023-055,966 · 0% AI
2023-0616,020 · 0% AI
2023-079,991 · 0% AI
2023-086,219 · 0% AI
2023-094,509 · 0% AI
2023-105,286 · 0% AI
2023-1110,489 · 0% AI
2023-1212,719 · 0% AI
2024-015,445 · 0% AI
2024-021,481 · 0% AI
2024-0318,028 · 0% AI
2024-04243 · 0% AI
2024-052,170 · 0% AI
2024-062,768 · 0% AI
2024-071,572 · 0% AI
2024-0848 · 0% AI
2024-10248 · 0% AI
2024-11345 · 0% AI
2025-020 · 0% AI
2026-01288 · 0% AI
2026-0236 · 0% AI
2026-0933 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok

attributed_commit_share: 0.0%
attributed_commits: 0
attributed_loc: 0
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 1,040
effective_loc: 201,505
tools_detected: 0

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok3 items

excluded_import_loc: 35,189
flagged_loc: 14,261
flagged_loc_share: 8.6%
flagged_units: 3
max_loc_per_hour: 1,948
measured_loc: 166,316
median_loc_per_hour: 65.21
pr_timed_units: 114
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 0
pre_ai_era_bursts: 0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 0
work_units: 519

Release velocityok

flagged_releases: 0
max_loc_per_day: 155.40
releases: 8

Coding styleok

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 1
count:narrated_steps: 0
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 1
files:narrated_steps: 0
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.01
lines_scanned: 56,540
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0.02
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Code quality

61 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.05, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 18% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

How the score is built

Complexity78
Duplication33
Lint and smells97
Tests and CI46
Documentation80
Type safety0
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 23
function_nloc: 26,365
functions: 2,707
long_functions: 7
many_param_functions: 6
mean_ccn: 2.28
p90_ccn: 4
risky_nloc_share: 8.1%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 36,222
duplicated_lines: 6,698
duplicated_share: 18.5%
files: 618

Lintok

category:best-practice: 5
category:correctness: 5
findings: 10
scanned_lines: 56,284
weighted_findings: 6.25

Tests and CIok2 items

CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
CI config: .github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml .github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: no
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 2
cochange_commits: 174
cochange_share: 21.3%
source_lines: 56,540
test_lines: 2,722
test_ratio: 0.05

Documentationok3 items

README.md README.md
LICENSE.md LICENSE.md
CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: yes
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 48

Type safetyok

check:low_escape_density: no
check:strict_config: no
escapes: 25
escapes_per_kloc: 10.21

Security

43 poor

Security posture is poor: 0 possible secret(s) in the tree, 2 only in history; 10 high-severity SAST findings; 10 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

Secrets14
Static analysis (SAST)95
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflows11
Security posture60
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesok

checked: 34
declared: 34
lookup_errors: 0
missing: 0
recent: 0

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 2
secrets_low_confidence: 0
secrets_nonprod: 48

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 10
findings_high: 10
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 0
parse_errors: 2
scanned_lines: 56,284
weighted_findings: 7.50

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 18
findings_high: 10
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 8
penalty: 134.40
workflows: 2

Security postureok2 items

Security policy: SECURITY.md SECURITY.md
src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/package.json has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/package.json

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: no
check:security_policy: yes
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 60.5%
unpinned_manifests: 1

Release downloadsok5 items

binary_assets: 252
signals: 1
suspicious: 0

Findings

20 high15 medium53 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:16	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:29	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:31	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:45	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:48	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:50	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:22	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:25	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:31	unpinned action reference [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.js:110	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.js:110	User controlled data in a `css.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.ts:131	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.ts:131	User controlled data in a `css.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.js:6	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.js:6	User controlled data in a `iframeDocument.body.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.ts:7	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.ts:7	User controlled data in a `iframeDocument.body.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/devtoys.g.js:956	User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/devtoys.g.js:956	User controlled data in a `css.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/Layout/SplitGrid/SplitGrid.razor.js:52	Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.lazy-load-module`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/Layout/SplitGrid/SplitGrid.razor.ts:66	Lazy loading can complicate code bundling if care is not taken, also `require`s are run synchronously by Node.js. If they are called from within a function, it may block other requests from being handled at a more critical time. The...	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.assigned-undefined`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/simplebar-modified.js:446	`undefined` is not a reserved keyword in Javascript, so this is "valid" Javascript but highly confusing and likely to result in bugs.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.assigned-undefined`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/simplebar-modified.js:499	`undefined` is not a reserved keyword in Javascript, so this is "valid" Javascript but highly confusing and likely to result in bugs.	Lint
medium	`opengrep/javascript.lang.best-practice.assigned-undefined`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/simplebar-modified.js:508	`undefined` is not a reserved keyword in Javascript, so this is "valid" Javascript but highly confusing and likely to result in bugs.	Lint
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:1	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:24	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:29	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:39	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:48	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/excessive-permissions`	.github/workflows/ci.yml:9	overly broad permissions [confidence medium]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:22	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/dev/DevToys.Tools/Models/JsonWebToken/JsonWebTokenPemEnumeration.cs:9	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
medium	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/dev/impl/DevToys/ViewModels/Tools/EncodersDecoders/JwtDecoderEncoder/JwtEncoder.cs:30	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 1954d5c42c); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	build.sh:7	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	init.sh:34	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	tools/Restore-MonacoEditor.sh:25	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	tools/Restore-MonacoEditor.sh:32	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command`	tools/Restore-MonacoEditor.sh:36	Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may...	Lint
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/Helpers/JsonWebTokenDecoderHelperTests.cs:35	Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/Helpers/JwtHelperTests.cs:11	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/CertificateDecoder/PemCertWithPrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 495db7dee4); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/CertificateDecoder/PemCertWithPrivateKeyWithExtensions.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 495db7dee4); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/ES/ES256-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/ES/ES256-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/ES/ES384-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/ES/ES384-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/ES/ES512-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/ES/ES512-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/HS/HS256-BasicToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/HS/HS256-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS256-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS256-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS256-RsaPrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS384-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS384-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS512-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/PS/PS512-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS256-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS256-EncryptedComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS256-EncryptedPrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS256-EncryptedPublicKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS256-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS256-RsaPrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS384-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS384-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS512-ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/app/tests/DevToys.UnitTests/Tools/TestData/JsonWebTokenEncoderDecoder/RS/RS512-PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Helpers/CertificateHelperTests.cs:164	Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 59f989f9b7); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Helpers/CertificateHelperTests.cs:268	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 5d5e6eef9b); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Helpers/JwtHelperTests.cs:13	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/ES/BasicToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/ES/ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/ES/PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/HS/BasicToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/HS/ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/PS/BasicToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/PS/ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/PS/PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/RS/BasicToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/RS/CertBasicToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 1954d5c42c); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/RS/ComplexToken.txt:1	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/RS/PrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/TestData/Jwt/RS/RsaPrivateKey.txt:1	Possible private-key secret in history (commit 1954d5c42c); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/jwt`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/Tools/JwtDecoderEncoderTests.cs:22	Possible jwt secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/Tools/JwtDecoderTests.cs:76	Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 3b0be14396); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)
low	`gitleaks/private-key`	src/tests/DevToys.Tests/Providers/Tools/JwtEncoderTests.cs:250	Possible private-key secret in history (commit a8b700b769); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-5`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-5`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	10
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	18
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	ok	`—`	0
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	10
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	50

Score history

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`2dbbc8aa5949`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	61	43

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys
Commit: 2dbbc8aa594978d11165a0e8112243c96a277dbc
Generated: 2026-11-14T15:22:34+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	possible	65%	100%
Code quality	61	weak	90%	100%
Security	43	poor	85%	100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 7.1%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
Stylometry index: 0.01 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2024-02	1,481	0%
2024-03	18,028	0%
2024-04	243	0%
2024-05	2,170	0%
2024-06	2,768	0%
2024-07	1,572	0%
2024-08	48	0%
2024-10	248	0%
2024-11	345	0%
2026-01	288	0%
2026-02	36	0%
2026-09	33	0%

Evidence

7,198 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (1,800 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (65716422d1e4)
3,693 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (923 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (a8b700b76944)
3,370 lines of first-party code in ~4.0h (842 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (25189b1dfa28)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.05, no CI test run detected; 8% of function code in complex or long functions; 18% duplicated lines. Weakest area: type safety.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	78
Duplication	33
Code smells (Opengrep)	97
Tests and CI	46
Documentation	80
Type safety	0
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 2,707; mean complexity 2.3, 90th percentile 4; 23 complex and 7 long functions
Duplicated lines: 18.5% of 36,222 compared
Tests: 2,722 test lines for 56,540 source lines (ratio 0.05); CI test commands: none detected; 21% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is poor: 0 possible secret(s) in the tree, 2 only in history; 10 high-severity SAST findings; 10 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	14
Static analysis (Opengrep)	95
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	11
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	60
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: security policy, signed commits; missing: dependency updates, lockfiles

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.js:110
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `css.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.js:110
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.ts:131
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `css.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Assets/javascript/dom.ts:131
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.js:6
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `iframeDocument.body.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.js:6
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.ts:7
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `iframeDocument.body.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/Components/UIElements/UIWebViewPresenter.razor.ts:7
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method`: User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/devtoys.g.js:956
high	`opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml`: User controlled data in a `css.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low]	src/app/dev/DevToys.Blazor/wwwroot/js/devtoys.g.js:956
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:16
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:29
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:31
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:45
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:48
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:50
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:22
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:25
high	`zizmor/unpinned-uses`: unpinned action reference [confidence high]	.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml:31
medium	`gitleaks/private-key`: Possible private-key secret in history (commit ea3dc87719); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	src/app/dev/DevToys.Tools/Models/JsonWebToken/JsonWebTokenPemEnumeration.cs:9
medium	`gitleaks/private-key`: Possible private-key secret in history (commit 1954d5c42c); removed from the current tree but still retrievable	src/dev/impl/DevToys/ViewModels/Tools/EncodersDecoders/JwtDecoderEncoder/JwtEncoder.cs:30
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:14
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:29
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yml:48

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

binary-release-asset: release v2.0.9.0 ships devtoys.cli_linux_arm.deb (259 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.0.9.0 ships devtoys.cli_linux_arm.zip (184 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.0.9.0 ships devtoys.cli_linux_arm_portable.zip (205 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.0.9.0 ships devtoys.cli_linux_x64.deb (1008 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v2.0.9.0 ships devtoys.cli_linux_x64.zip (255 downloads)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

Source lines: 56,540; test lines: 2,722

Language	Lines
C#	50,291
JavaScript	6,089
TypeScript	2,449
PowerShell	256
Shell	177