Leaderboard github.com
CymChad/BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper
BRVAH:Powerful and flexible RecyclerAdapter
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
58/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
74/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files3
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.22
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2016-043,319 · 0% AI
- 2016-05468 · 0% AI
- 2016-06987 · 0% AI
- 2016-07787 · 0% AI
- 2016-081,990 · 0% AI
- 2016-09562 · 0% AI
- 2016-10287 · 0% AI
- 2016-111,036 · 0% AI
- 2016-122,149 · 0% AI
- 2017-01306 · 0% AI
- 2017-02123 · 0% AI
- 2017-031,179 · 0% AI
- 2017-04447 · 0% AI
- 2017-05313 · 0% AI
- 2017-064,306 · 0% AI
- 2017-07161 · 0% AI
- 2017-0859 · 0% AI
- 2017-0992 · 0% AI
- 2017-10162 · 0% AI
- 2017-1123 · 0% AI
- 2017-1211 · 0% AI
- 2018-015 · 0% AI
- 2018-024 · 0% AI
- 2018-03543 · 0% AI
- 2018-04274 · 0% AI
- 2018-050 · 0% AI
- 2018-073 · 0% AI
- 2018-08396 · 0% AI
- 2018-0989 · 0% AI
- 2018-10160 · 0% AI
- 2018-129 · 0% AI
- 2019-01210 · 0% AI
- 2019-02211 · 0% AI
- 2019-05414 · 0% AI
- 2019-066 · 0% AI
- 2019-071,428 · 0% AI
- 2019-08314 · 0% AI
- 2019-1110 · 0% AI
- 2019-126,686 · 0% AI
- 2020-01619 · 0% AI
- 2020-02111 · 0% AI
- 2020-031,136 · 0% AI
- 2020-0415 · 0% AI
- 2020-05148 · 0% AI
- 2020-088 · 0% AI
- 2020-106 · 0% AI
- 2021-0120 · 0% AI
- 2021-0331 · 0% AI
- 2021-1114 · 0% AI
- 2022-060 · 0% AI
- 2022-0710,176 · 0% AI
- 2022-084,335 · 0% AI
- 2022-0995 · 0% AI
- 2022-109 · 0% AI
- 2023-020 · 0% AI
- 2023-0458 · 0% AI
- 2023-05339 · 0% AI
- 2023-0637 · 0% AI
- 2023-08195 · 0% AI
- 2023-10162 · 0% AI
- 2023-11317 · 0% AI
- 2023-1221 · 0% AI
- 2024-0168 · 0% AI
- 2024-0631 · 0% AI
- 2025-0521 · 0% AI
- 2025-091,165 · 0% AI
- 2025-10153 · 0% AI
- 2025-110 · 0% AI
- 2025-121 · 0% AI
- 2026-02299 · 0% AI
- 2026-030 · 0% AI
- 2026-0498 · 0% AI
- 2026-05189 · 0% AI
- 2026-0637 · 0% AI
- 2026-1064 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 1,274
- effective_loc
- 49,507
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok3 items
- .claude/settings.local.json (claude-code configuration)
- CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration)
- AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration)
- artifacts
- 3
- earliest_adoption
- 2026-05-14
- tools_configured
- 2
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 12,456
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 380.25
- measured_loc
- 37,051
- median_loc_per_hour
- 60.85
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 25,294
- work_units
- 498
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 4,603.90
- releases
- 99
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 4
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 2
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.22
- lines_scanned
- 8,910
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0.45
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
58 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 3% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity92
- Duplication52
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI15
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process35
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok1 item
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 3,829
- functions
- 556
- long_functions
- 1
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.67
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 2.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/MyApplication.kt:2 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/entity/ClickEntity.java:2
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/animation/AnimationUseActivity.kt:34 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DefaultDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:41
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/animation/adapter/AnimationAdapter.kt:63 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/loadmore/adapter/RecyclerViewAdapter.kt:57
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/databinding/DataBindingUseActivity.java:43 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/differ/DifferActivity.java:36
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DefaultDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:36 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DragAndSwipeDifferActivity.kt:38
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DefaultDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:68 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DefaultDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:98
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DragAndSwipeDifferActivity.kt:102 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/HeaderDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:119
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/DragAndSwipeUseActivity.java:27 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/ManualDragAndSwipeUseActivity.java:51
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/HeaderDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:38 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/loadmore/AutoLoadMoreRefreshUseActivity.kt:27
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/dragswipe/HeaderDragAndSwipeActivity.kt:57 and app/src/main/java/com/chad/baserecyclerviewadapterhelper/activity/headerfooter/HeaderAndFooterUseActivity.kt:22
- compared_lines
- 4,801
- duplicated_lines
- 528
- duplicated_share
- 11.0%
- files
- 94
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 8,910
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok1 item
- CI config: .github/workflows/build.yml
.github/workflows/build.yml
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- no
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 211
- cochange_share
- 0.5%
- source_lines
- 8,910
- test_lines
- 0
- test_ratio
- 0
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 29
Type safetyskipped
Security
74 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: scorecard.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)98
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflows52
- Security posture40
- OpenSSF Scorecard27
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok12 items
- Scorecard Token-Permissions: 0/10 (detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 10/10 (security policy file detected)
- Scorecard Maintained: 7/10 (9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7)
- Scorecard Code-Review: 0/10 (Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Dangerous-Workflow: 10/10 (no dangerous workflow patterns detected)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 9/10 (binaries present in source code)
- Scorecard Pinned-Dependencies: 0/10 (dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- aggregate
- 4.10
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- no
- check:Dangerous-Workflow
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- yes
- check:Pinned-Dependencies
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- yes
- check:Token-Permissions
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 1
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 1
- scanned_lines
- 8,910
- weighted_findings
- 0.60
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 5
- findings_high
- 3
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- penalty
- 39.60
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok1 item
- Security policy: SECURITY.md
SECURITY.md
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- yes
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 16.0%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
3 high3 medium
6 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:14 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:17 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build.yml:23 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/build.yml:10 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build.yml:14 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity |
app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:14 | The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-5 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-5 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 5 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 40997b531652 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 58 | 74 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/CymChad/BaseRecyclerViewAdapterHelper
- Commit:
40997b531652019b10ed2fdd2712da5709dd90d3 - Generated: 2026-11-14T15:20:31+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 58 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 74 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
AI tooling configured in repo: claude-code, generic-agent
-
Stylometry index: 0.22 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 4). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-12 | 21 | 0% |
| 2024-01 | 68 | 0% |
| 2024-06 | 31 | 0% |
| 2025-05 | 21 | 0% |
| 2025-09 | 1,165 | 0% |
| 2025-10 | 153 | 0% |
| 2025-12 | 1 | 0% |
| 2026-02 | 299 | 0% |
| 2026-04 | 98 | 0% |
| 2026-05 | 189 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 37 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 64 | 0% |
Evidence
- .claude/settings.local.json (claude-code configuration) (.claude/sett)
- CLAUDE.md (claude-code configuration) (CLAUDE.md)
- AGENTS.md (generic-agent configuration) (AGENTS.md)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 3% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 92 |
| Duplication | 52 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 15 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 35 |
- Functions: 556; mean complexity 1.7, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 1 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 11.0% of 4,801 compared
- Tests: 0 test lines for 8,910 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
Security
Security posture is adequate: 3 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: scorecard.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 98 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 52 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 40 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 27 |
- Posture checks passed: security policy, lockfiles; missing: dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 4.1/10 (published 2026-11-09)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:14 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:17 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:23 |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] |
app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:14 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:14 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/build.yml:10 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 8,910; test lines: 0
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Kotlin | 7,223 |
| Java | 1,687 |