RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

BurntSushi/ripgrep

ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore

  • View repository ↗
  • Rust
  • ★ 69,945
  • commit 178cc027e283
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

possible

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

74/100

adequate

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

71/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts1%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace1
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.06

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2016-0272 · 0% AI
  2. 2016-03571 · 0% AI
  3. 2016-0447 · 0% AI
  4. 2016-06709 · 0% AI
  5. 2016-082,954 · 0% AI
  6. 2016-099,078 · 0% AI
  7. 2016-105,951 · 0% AI
  8. 2016-115,094 · 0% AI
  9. 2016-12220 · 0% AI
  10. 2017-01756 · 0% AI
  11. 2017-02526 · 0% AI
  12. 2017-03912 · 0% AI
  13. 2017-04676 · 0% AI
  14. 2017-0593 · 0% AI
  15. 2017-06146 · 0% AI
  16. 2017-07696 · 0% AI
  17. 2017-08211 · 0% AI
  18. 2017-09111 · 0% AI
  19. 2017-10272 · 0% AI
  20. 2017-1166 · 0% AI
  21. 2017-12131 · 0% AI
  22. 2018-01814 · 0% AI
  23. 2018-023,855 · 0% AI
  24. 2018-03374 · 0% AI
  25. 2018-0417,396 · 0% AI
  26. 2018-056 · 0% AI
  27. 2018-06338 · 0% AI
  28. 2018-07599 · 0% AI
  29. 2018-088,522 · 0% AI
  30. 2018-09404 · 0% AI
  31. 2018-101 · 0% AI
  32. 2018-1169 · 0% AI
  33. 2018-1274 · 0% AI
  34. 2019-01901 · 0% AI
  35. 2019-0221 · 0% AI
  36. 2019-03127 · 0% AI
  37. 2019-042,101 · 0% AI
  38. 2019-0513 · 0% AI
  39. 2019-06124 · 0% AI
  40. 2019-0729 · 0% AI
  41. 2019-08567 · 0% AI
  42. 2019-09175 · 0% AI
  43. 2019-10220 · 0% AI
  44. 2019-1181 · 0% AI
  45. 2019-12182 · 0% AI
  46. 2020-0120 · 0% AI
  47. 2020-023,531 · 0% AI
  48. 2020-03167 · 0% AI
  49. 2020-04231 · 0% AI
  50. 2020-0587 · 0% AI
  51. 2020-0613 · 0% AI
  52. 2020-07137 · 0% AI
  53. 2020-0820 · 0% AI
  54. 2020-096 · 0% AI
  55. 2020-1052 · 0% AI
  56. 2020-11102 · 0% AI
  57. 2020-12203 · 0% AI
  58. 2021-01148 · 0% AI
  59. 2021-020 · 0% AI
  60. 2021-0332 · 0% AI
  61. 2021-0411 · 0% AI
  62. 2021-051,057 · 0% AI
  63. 2021-06579 · 0% AI
  64. 2021-07131 · 0% AI
  65. 2021-0823 · 0% AI
  66. 2021-091 · 0% AI
  67. 2021-1017 · 0% AI
  68. 2021-1163 · 0% AI
  69. 2022-0115 · 0% AI
  70. 2022-021 · 0% AI
  71. 2022-038 · 0% AI
  72. 2022-045 · 0% AI
  73. 2022-05141 · 0% AI
  74. 2022-0639 · 0% AI
  75. 2022-0774 · 0% AI
  76. 2022-0843 · 0% AI
  77. 2022-092 · 0% AI
  78. 2022-104 · 0% AI
  79. 2022-11263 · 0% AI
  80. 2022-1237 · 0% AI
  81. 2023-01116 · 0% AI
  82. 2023-027 · 0% AI
  83. 2023-039 · 0% AI
  84. 2023-0442 · 0% AI
  85. 2023-059 · 0% AI
  86. 2023-062,171 · 0% AI
  87. 2023-071,253 · 0% AI
  88. 2023-08142 · 0% AI
  89. 2023-093,200 · 0% AI
  90. 2023-1012,305 · 0% AI
  91. 2023-11871 · 0% AI
  92. 2023-12135 · 0% AI
  93. 2024-01110 · 0% AI
  94. 2024-0221 · 0% AI
  95. 2024-037 · 0% AI
  96. 2024-0435 · 0% AI
  97. 2024-0561 · 0% AI
  98. 2024-0639 · 0% AI
  99. 2024-075 · 0% AI
  100. 2024-0858 · 0% AI
  101. 2024-09283 · 0% AI
  102. 2024-1014 · 0% AI
  103. 2024-11175 · 0% AI
  104. 2024-1227 · 0% AI
  105. 2025-011 · 0% AI
  106. 2025-0214 · 0% AI
  107. 2025-031 · 0% AI
  108. 2025-0430 · 0% AI
  109. 2025-0569 · 0% AI
  110. 2025-0639 · 0% AI
  111. 2025-07894 · 0% AI
  112. 2025-08265 · 0% AI
  113. 2025-09523 · 0% AI
  114. 2025-10447 · 0% AI
  115. 2025-1124 · 0% AI
  116. 2025-1225 · 0% AI
  117. 2026-0179 · 0% AI
  118. 2026-0214 · 0% AI
  119. 2026-03165 · 0% AI
  120. 2026-041 · 0% AI
  121. 2026-05178 · 0% AI
  122. 2026-06652 · 0% AI
  123. 2026-073,665 · 0% AI
  124. 2026-0814 · 0% AI
  125. 2026-101,115 · 0% AI
  126. 2026-1137 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
2,242
effective_loc
102,895
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok1 item
excluded_import_loc
17,185
flagged_loc
1,001
flagged_loc_share
1.2%
flagged_units
1
max_loc_per_hour
2,172.86
measured_loc
85,710
median_loc_per_hour
54.19
pr_timed_units
350
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
11,877
pre_ai_era_bursts
4
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
55,495
work_units
952
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
841.90
releases
99
Coding styleok3 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
3
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
3
files:placeholder
0
index
0.06
lines_scanned
49,948
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.06
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

74 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.13, no CI test run detected; 7% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.

How the score is built

  • Complexity81
  • Duplication51
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI58
  • Documentation100
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review process75

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
25
function_nloc
24,698
functions
2,192
long_functions
4
many_param_functions
0
mean_ccn
2.18
p90_ccn
5
risky_nloc_share
7.1%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
36,158
duplicated_lines
4,091
duplicated_share
11.3%
files
92
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
49,936
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok3 items
  • CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yml .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • CI config: .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release.yml
  • CI runs linters (rustfmt, cargo fmt)
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
yes
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
2
cochange_commits
160
cochange_share
16.2%
source_lines
49,948
test_lines
6,440
test_ratio
0.13
Documentationok4 items
  • README.md README.md
  • COPYING COPYING
  • CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md
  • CHANGELOG.md CHANGELOG.md
check:changelog
yes
check:contributing
yes
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
407
Type safetyskipped

Security

71 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 22 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)98
  • Vulnerable dependencies100
  • CI workflows1
  • Security posture20
  • OpenSSF Scorecard43

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardok12 items
aggregate
5
check:Binary-Artifacts
yes
check:CII-Best-Practices
no
check:Code-Review
yes
check:Dangerous-Workflow
yes
check:Fuzzing
yes
check:License
yes
check:Maintained
yes
check:Pinned-Dependencies
no
check:SAST
no
check:Security-Policy
no
check:Signed-Releases
no
check:Token-Permissions
no
Package registriesok
checked
25
declared
25
lookup_errors
0
missing
0
recent
0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
11
findings_high
0
findings_low
11
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
3
scanned_lines
49,936
weighted_findings
2.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
penalty
0
vulnerabilities
0
vulnerable_packages
0
vulns_critical
0
vulns_high
0
vulns_low
0
vulns_medium
0
vulns_unknown
0
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
findings
37
findings_high
22
findings_low
6
findings_medium
9
penalty
276.80
workflows
2
Security postureok9 items
  • crates/cli/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/cli/Cargo.toml
  • crates/globset/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/globset/Cargo.toml
  • crates/grep/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/grep/Cargo.toml
  • crates/ignore/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/ignore/Cargo.toml
  • crates/matcher/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/matcher/Cargo.toml
  • crates/pcre2/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/pcre2/Cargo.toml
  • crates/printer/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/printer/Cargo.toml
  • crates/regex/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/regex/Cargo.toml
  • crates/searcher/Cargo.toml has no lockfile alongside it (unpinned dependencies) crates/searcher/Cargo.toml
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
no
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
yes
signed_commit_share
50.5%
unpinned_manifests
9
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
121
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

22 high9 medium13 low4 info

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:120 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:132 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:138 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:218 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:220 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:232 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:234 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:245 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:247 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:260 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:262 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:273 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/ci.yml:281 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/release.yml:11 overly broad permissions [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/release.yml:12 overly broad permissions [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/excessive-permissions .github/workflows/release.yml:13 overly broad permissions [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:142 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:151 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:23 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:26 code injection via template expansion [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:314 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
high zizmor/unpinned-uses .github/workflows/release.yml:322 unpinned action reference [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:119 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:217 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:231 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:244 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:259 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/ci.yml:272 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/release.yml:141 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/release.yml:23 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
medium zizmor/artipacked .github/workflows/release.yml:313 credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:298 code injection via template expansion [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
low zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:298 code injection via template expansion [confidence high] CI workflows (zizmor)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage crates/cli/src/hostname.rs:41 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage crates/cli/src/hostname.rs:59 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage crates/core/flags/hiargs.rs:232 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe crates/core/flags/lowargs.rs:681 current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe crates/core/flags/lowargs.rs:690 current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.current-exe crates/core/flags/lowargs.rs:699 current_exe should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The output of this function should not be trusted for anything that might have security implications. Basically, if users can run the executable, they can change... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.args-os crates/core/flags/parse.rs:103 args_os should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.args-os crates/core/flags/parse.rs:72 args_os should not be used for security operations. From the docs: "The first element is traditionally the path of the executable, but it can be set to arbitrary text, and might not even exist. This means this property should not be... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir crates/ignore/benches/workloads.rs:44 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.temp-dir crates/ignore/src/lib.rs:529 temp_dir should not be used for security operations. From the docs: 'The temporary directory may be shared among users, or between processes with different privileges; thus, the creation of any files or directories in the temporary... Static analysis (opengrep)
low opengrep/rust.lang.security.unsafe-usage crates/searcher/src/searcher/mmap.rs:84 Detected 'unsafe' usage, please audit for secure usage [confidence high] Static analysis (opengrep)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:213 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:297 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:367 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)
info zizmor/template-injection .github/workflows/release.yml:385 code injection via template expansion [confidence low] CI workflows (zizmor)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityokzizmor 1.32.037
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityokosv-scanner version: 2.7.10
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityok—0
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b41411
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityokscorecard v5.6.00
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14178cc027e283prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%7471

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep
  • Commit: 178cc027e283fd965cb72d0a7395b219eada170c
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T15:15:29+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 possible 65% 100%
Code quality 74 adequate 90% 100%
Security 71 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 1.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 0.06 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 3, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2025-11 24 0%
2025-12 25 0%
2026-01 79 0%
2026-02 14 0%
2026-03 165 0%
2026-04 1 0%
2026-05 178 0%
2026-06 652 0%
2026-07 3,665 0%
2026-08 14 0%
2026-10 1,115 0%
2026-11 37 0%

Evidence

  • 1,001 lines of first-party code in ~1.4h (721 lines/hour, PR #3483) (be739c791028)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // First, check that the parent gitignore file isn't detected if the (crates/ignor)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Finally, add a leading slash. In the local file case, this turns (crates/print)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // now we just pick one. (crates/regex)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.13, no CI test run detected; 7% of function code in complex or long functions; 11% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 81
Duplication 51
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 58
Documentation 100
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) 75
  • Functions: 2,192; mean complexity 2.2, 90th percentile 5; 25 complex and 4 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 11.3% of 36,158 compared
  • Tests: 6,440 test lines for 49,948 source lines (ratio 0.13); CI test commands: none detected; 16% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: none

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 22 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: ci actions.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 98
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) 100
CI workflows (zizmor) 1
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 20
OpenSSF Scorecard 43
  • Posture checks passed: signed commits; missing: security policy, dependency updates, lockfiles
  • OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 5.0/10 (published 2026-11-09)

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:120
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:132
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:138
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:218
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:220
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:232
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:234
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:245
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:247
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:260
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:262
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:273
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/ci.yml:281
high zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:11
high zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:12
high zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:13
high zizmor/template-injection: code injection via template expansion [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:26
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:23
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:142
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:151
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:314
high zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] .github/workflows/release.yml:322
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:119
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:217
medium zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] .github/workflows/ci.yml:231

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 49,948; test lines: 6,440
Language Lines
Rust 55,512
Shell 841
Ruby 23
Lua 12