Leaderboard github.com
BookStackApp/BookStack
NOW MANAGED ON CODEBERG
AI provenance
0%
possible
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
62/100
weak
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
70/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% possible
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts2%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace3
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.01
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2015-074,870 · 0% AI
- 2015-084,076 · 0% AI
- 2015-093,043 · 0% AI
- 2015-10896 · 0% AI
- 2015-11923 · 0% AI
- 2015-122,148 · 0% AI
- 2016-011,635 · 0% AI
- 2016-022,963 · 0% AI
- 2016-033,289 · 0% AI
- 2016-041,268 · 0% AI
- 2016-052,261 · 0% AI
- 2016-06680 · 0% AI
- 2016-07440 · 0% AI
- 2016-08865 · 0% AI
- 2016-091,784 · 0% AI
- 2016-101,607 · 0% AI
- 2016-111,013 · 0% AI
- 2016-121,679 · 0% AI
- 2017-013,659 · 0% AI
- 2017-022,559 · 0% AI
- 2017-031,675 · 0% AI
- 2017-042,755 · 0% AI
- 2017-05426 · 0% AI
- 2017-061,312 · 0% AI
- 2017-072,767 · 0% AI
- 2017-084,785 · 0% AI
- 2017-094,383 · 0% AI
- 2017-10187 · 0% AI
- 2017-11470 · 0% AI
- 2017-121,018 · 0% AI
- 2018-012,169 · 0% AI
- 2018-021,336 · 0% AI
- 2018-03817 · 0% AI
- 2018-042,686 · 0% AI
- 2018-051,100 · 0% AI
- 2018-06314 · 0% AI
- 2018-072,495 · 0% AI
- 2018-081,286 · 0% AI
- 2018-093,358 · 0% AI
- 2018-102,461 · 0% AI
- 2018-11475 · 0% AI
- 2018-123,565 · 0% AI
- 2019-01756 · 0% AI
- 2019-022,836 · 0% AI
- 2019-031,750 · 0% AI
- 2019-042,732 · 0% AI
- 2019-051,613 · 0% AI
- 2019-061,286 · 0% AI
- 2019-072,647 · 0% AI
- 2019-082,830 · 0% AI
- 2019-092,962 · 0% AI
- 2019-108,613 · 0% AI
- 2019-111,403 · 0% AI
- 2019-123,243 · 0% AI
- 2020-013,184 · 0% AI
- 2020-022,314 · 0% AI
- 2020-034,695 · 0% AI
- 2020-043,459 · 0% AI
- 2020-05899 · 0% AI
- 2020-061,615 · 0% AI
- 2020-072,090 · 0% AI
- 2020-08628 · 0% AI
- 2020-093,447 · 0% AI
- 2020-101,527 · 0% AI
- 2020-112,544 · 0% AI
- 2020-12906 · 0% AI
- 2021-012,922 · 0% AI
- 2021-021,764 · 0% AI
- 2021-035,836 · 0% AI
- 2021-041,285 · 0% AI
- 2021-052,738 · 0% AI
- 2021-067,198 · 0% AI
- 2021-071,133 · 0% AI
- 2021-086,244 · 0% AI
- 2021-092,550 · 0% AI
- 2021-108,247 · 0% AI
- 2021-114,004 · 0% AI
- 2021-122,819 · 0% AI
- 2022-014,764 · 0% AI
- 2022-0215,058 · 0% AI
- 2022-034,709 · 0% AI
- 2022-043,668 · 0% AI
- 2022-05898 · 0% AI
- 2022-063,723 · 0% AI
- 2022-073,659 · 0% AI
- 2022-082,853 · 0% AI
- 2022-095,689 · 0% AI
- 2022-104,641 · 0% AI
- 2022-115,967 · 0% AI
- 2022-12435 · 0% AI
- 2023-014,103 · 0% AI
- 2023-023,528 · 0% AI
- 2023-031,457 · 0% AI
- 2023-044,101 · 0% AI
- 2023-053,127 · 0% AI
- 2023-064,349 · 0% AI
- 2023-072,086 · 0% AI
- 2023-086,146 · 0% AI
- 2023-093,740 · 0% AI
- 2023-105,672 · 0% AI
- 2023-111,908 · 0% AI
- 2023-125,534 · 0% AI
- 2024-011,666 · 0% AI
- 2024-024,041 · 0% AI
- 2024-03919 · 0% AI
- 2024-04868 · 0% AI
- 2024-053,289 · 0% AI
- 2024-062,948 · 0% AI
- 2024-073,822 · 0% AI
- 2024-086,148 · 0% AI
- 2024-0954,059 · 0% AI
- 2024-105,008 · 0% AI
- 2024-115,423 · 0% AI
- 2024-128,128 · 0% AI
- 2025-011,479 · 0% AI
- 2025-025,852 · 0% AI
- 2025-03821 · 0% AI
- 2025-041,868 · 0% AI
- 2025-052,533 · 0% AI
- 2025-06975 · 0% AI
- 2025-074,953 · 0% AI
- 2025-081,305 · 0% AI
- 2025-091,231 · 0% AI
- 2025-103,495 · 0% AI
- 2025-111,849 · 0% AI
- 2025-122,753 · 0% AI
- 2026-01962 · 0% AI
- 2026-023,301 · 0% AI
- 2026-03731 · 0% AI
- 2026-041,690 · 0% AI
- 2026-054,892 · 0% AI
- 2026-06458 · 0% AI
- 2026-072,109 · 0% AI
- 2026-084,391 · 0% AI
- 2026-092,762 · 0% AI
- 2026-10483 · 0% AI
- 2026-11559 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 4,853
- effective_loc
- 439,803
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok3 items
- 5,328 lines of first-party code in ~0.5h (10,656 lines/hour, PR #3258)
- 3,080 lines of first-party code in ~0.5h (6,160 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- 1,010 lines of first-party code in ~1.2h (828 lines/hour, 1 commit session)
- excluded_import_loc
- 67,055
- flagged_loc
- 9,418
- flagged_loc_share
- 2.5%
- flagged_units
- 3
- max_loc_per_hour
- 10,656
- measured_loc
- 372,748
- median_loc_per_hour
- 59.99
- pr_timed_units
- 247
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 5,147
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 2
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 153,315
- work_units
- 2,943
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 0
- releases
- 0
Coding styleok2 items
- step-by-step narration comment: // Now we will clear the users out of memory so they are no longer available
- step-by-step narration comment: // Now we process each of the unique target nodes, attempting
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 2
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 2
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0.01
- lines_scanned
- 217,367
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0.01
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
62 weak
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.26, no CI test run detected; 11% of function code in complex or long functions; 16% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
How the score is built
- Complexity72
- Duplication39
- Lint and smells99
- Tests and CI43
- Documentation65
- Type safety100
- Review process50
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
- insertText in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalSelection.ts: complexity 91, 287 lines
- $handleArrowKey in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/table/LexicalTableSelectionHelpers.ts: complexity 62, 281 lines
- (anonymous) in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalEvents.ts: complexity 56, 191 lines
- updateDOMSelection in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalSelection.ts: complexity 47, 144 lines
- (anonymous) in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalMutations.ts: complexity 45, 136 lines
- $patchStyleText in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/selection/lexical-node.ts: complexity 44, 119 lines
- deleteCharacter in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalSelection.ts: complexity 41, 92 lines
- (anonymous) in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/table/LexicalTableSelectionHelpers.ts: complexity 41, 129 lines
- $wrapNodesImpl in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/selection/range-selection.ts: complexity 37, 137 lines
- onKeyDown in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalEvents.ts: complexity 34, 97 lines
- complex_functions
- 74
- function_nloc
- 61,395
- functions
- 6,308
- long_functions
- 22
- many_param_functions
- 1
- mean_ccn
- 2.36
- p90_ccn
- 5
- risky_nloc_share
- 11.2%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Access/Controllers/MfaBackupCodesController.php:62 and app/Access/Controllers/MfaTotpController.php:74
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Access/Guards/AsyncExternalBaseSessionGuard.php:15 and app/Access/Guards/ExternalBaseSessionGuard.php:135
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Activity/Controllers/WebhookController.php:61 and app/Activity/Controllers/WebhookController.php:99
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Activity/Notifications/Messages/CommentCreationNotification.php:14 and app/Activity/Notifications/Messages/CommentMentionNotification.php:14
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Activity/Notifications/Messages/PageCreationNotification.php:13 and app/Activity/Notifications/Messages/PageUpdateNotification.php:13
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Entities/Controllers/BookApiController.php:143 and app/Entities/Controllers/BookshelfApiController.php:127
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Entities/Controllers/BookController.php:93 and app/Entities/Controllers/BookController.php:172
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Entities/Controllers/PageController.php:282 and app/Entities/Controllers/PageController.php:307
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Entities/Queries/BookQueries.php:58 and app/Entities/Queries/BookshelfQueries.php:63
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/Entities/Repos/BaseRepo.php:51 and app/Entities/Repos/BaseRepo.php:86
- compared_lines
- 164,572
- duplicated_lines
- 25,539
- duplicated_share
- 15.5%
- files
- 1,981
Lintok
- category:correctness
- 14
- findings
- 14
- scanned_lines
- 217,362
- weighted_findings
- 5.75
Tests and CIok
- check:ci_present
- no
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- no
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- yes
- ci_files
- 0
- cochange_commits
- 228
- cochange_share
- 50.4%
- source_lines
- 217,367
- test_lines
- 55,649
- test_ratio
- 0.26
Documentationok2 items
- readme.md
readme.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 142
Type safetyok1 item
- TypeScript strict type checking: tsconfig.json
tsconfig.json
- check:low_escape_density
- yes
- check:strict_config
- yes
- escapes
- 151
- escapes_per_kloc
- 3.11
Security
70 weak
Security posture is weak: 6 known vulnerabilities in 6 dependencies; 74 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets88
- Static analysis (SAST)90
- Vulnerable dependencies77
- CI workflowsnot measured
- Security posture20
- OpenSSF Scorecard20
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok10 items
- Scorecard Maintained: 10/10 (30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10)
- Scorecard Code-Review: 0/10 (Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (no SAST tool detected)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 10/10 (no binaries found in the repo)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard Pinned-Dependencies: 0/10 (dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard Branch-Protection: 0/10 (branch protection not enabled on development/release branches)
- aggregate
- 3.20
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:Branch-Protection
- no
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- no
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- yes
- check:Pinned-Dependencies
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
Package registriesok
- checked
- 36
- declared
- 36
- lookup_errors
- 0
- missing
- 0
- recent
- 0
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 2
- secrets_nonprod
- 2
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 111
- findings_high
- 74
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 37
- parse_errors
- 5
- scanned_lines
- 217,362
- weighted_findings
- 64.75
Dependencies (osv-scanner)ok
- penalty
- 16
- vulnerabilities
- 6
- vulnerable_packages
- 6
- vulns_critical
- 0
- vulns_high
- 0
- vulns_low
- 1
- vulns_medium
- 5
- vulns_unknown
- 0
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- yes
- signed_commit_share
- 92.5%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
74 high45 medium16 low
135 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Access/Guards/ExternalBaseSessionGuard.php:220 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-dangerous-model-construction |
app/Activity/Models/Watch.php:26 | Setting `$guarded` to an empty array allows mass assignment to every property in a Laravel model. This explicitly overrides Eloquent's safe-by-default mass assignment protections. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/App/helpers.php:23 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-cookie-secure-set |
app/Config/session.php:56 | Found a configuration file where the secure attribute is not set to 'true'. Setting 'secure' to 'true' prevents the client from transmitting the cookie over unencrypted channels and therefore prevents cookies from being stolen through... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Entities/Tools/PageContent.php:361 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Entities/Tools/SlugGenerator.php:55 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Theming/CustomHtmlHeadContentProvider.php:27 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Theming/CustomHtmlHeadContentProvider.php:43 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Theming/ThemeService.php:139 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto |
app/Uploads/UserAvatars.php:108 | Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/code/index.mjs:64 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/code/index.mjs:64 | User controlled data in a `elem.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:66 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:66 | User controlled data in a `this.responseContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:71 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:71 | User controlled data in a `this.responseContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:64 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:64 | User controlled data in a `this.listPanel.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:80 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:80 | User controlled data in a `this.editContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:116 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:116 | User controlled data in a `this.list.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/code-editor.js:203 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/code-editor.js:203 | User controlled data in a `this.historyList.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/dropdown-search.js:57 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/dropdown-search.js:57 | User controlled data in a `this.listContainerElem.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/entity-search.js:44 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/entity-search.js:44 | User controlled data in a `this.searchResults.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/entity-selector.ts:141 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/entity-selector.ts:141 | User controlled data in a `this.resultsContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/entity-selector.ts:159 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/entity-selector.ts:159 | User controlled data in a `this.resultsContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/image-manager.js:187 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/image-manager.js:187 | User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/image-manager.js:192 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/image-manager.js:192 | User controlled data in a `this.loadMore.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/image-manager.js:274 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/image-manager.js:274 | User controlled data in a `this.formContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/page-comment-reference.ts:122 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/page-comment-reference.ts:122 | User controlled data in a `marker.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/page-comment-reference.ts:202 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/page-comment-reference.ts:202 | User controlled data in a `close.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/page-editor.js:56 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/page-editor.js:56 | User controlled data in a `this.draftDisplay.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/template-manager.js:77 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/template-manager.js:77 | User controlled data in a `this.list.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/template-manager.js:86 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/template-manager.js:86 | User controlled data in a `this.list.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/components/user-select.js:17 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/components/user-select.js:17 | User controlled data in a `this.userInfoContainer.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/services/dom.ts:176 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/services/dom.ts:176 | User controlled data in a `wrap.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/services/vdom.ts:26 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/services/vdom.ts:26 | User controlled data in a `contentDom.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/config.js:167 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/config.js:167 | User controlled data in a `el.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugin-codeeditor.js:103 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugin-codeeditor.js:103 | User controlled data in a `tempEl.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugins-details.js:237 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugins-details.js:237 | User controlled data in a `details.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/decorators/MentionDecorator.ts:99 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/decorators/MentionDecorator.ts:99 | User controlled data in a `iconWrap.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/color-picker.ts:68 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/color-picker.ts:68 | User controlled data in a `removeButton.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/color-picker.ts:77 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/color-picker.ts:77 | User controlled data in a `selectButton.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/external-content.ts:23 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/external-content.ts:23 | User controlled data in a `wrapper.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/menu-button.ts:10 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/blocks/menu-button.ts:10 | User controlled data in a `icon.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/buttons.ts:64 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/buttons.ts:64 | User controlled data in a `icon.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/modals.ts:60 | User controlled data in methods like `innerHTML`, `outerHTML` or `document.write` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml |
resources/js/wysiwyg/ui/framework/modals.ts:60 | User controlled data in a `closeButton.innerHTML` is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:101 | JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:96 | JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.no-stringify-keys |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:97 | JSON stringify does not produce a stable key ordering, and should not be relied on for producing object keys. Consider using json-stable-stringify instead. | Lint |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Console/Commands/InstallModuleCommand.php:255 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Console/Commands/InstallModuleCommand.php:264 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Exports/PdfGenerator.php:151 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Exports/ZipExports/ZipExportBuilder.php:100 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Exports/ZipExports/ZipExportBuilder.php:106 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Exports/ZipExports/ZipExportBuilder.php:113 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Exports/ZipExports/ZipImportRunner.php:121 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Http/DownloadResponseFactory.php:51 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.lang.security.unlink-use |
app/Theming/ThemeModuleManager.php:79 | Using user input when deleting files with `unlink()` is potentially dangerous. A malicious actor could use this to modify or access files they have no right to. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 |
package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 |
package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 |
package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 |
package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | osv/GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 |
package-lock.json | [email protected] (npm) is affected by GHSA-gcqx-w48m-w2h4 | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/code/languages.js:113 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.jquery.security.audit.prohibit-jquery-html |
resources/js/code/languages.js:39 | JQuery's `html` function is susceptible to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. If you're just passing text, consider `text` instead. Otherwise, use a function that escapes HTML such as edX's `HtmlUtils.setHtml()`. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:64 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:116 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/components/book-sort.js:200 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/components/code-editor.js:205 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/markdown/actions.ts:115 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/markdown/actions.ts:141 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/markdown/actions.ts:344 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/markdown/inputs/textarea.ts:149 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/services/multi-lists.ts:61 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.incomplete-sanitization |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/config.js:222 | `` html, body, html.dark-mode { background: ${options.darkMode ? '#222' : '#fff'}; } body { padding-left: 15px !important; padding-right: 15px !important; height: initial !important; margin:0!important; ... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/drop-paste-handling.js:50 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/drop-paste-handling.js:54 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/fixes.js:155 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugin-drawio.js:109 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugin-drawio.js:30 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugin-drawio.js:69 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugins-imagemanager.js:15 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/plugins-imagemanager.js:16 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.html-in-template-string |
resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/rich-text/LexicalMediaNode.ts:349 | This template literal looks like HTML and has interpolated variables. These variables are not HTML-encoded by default. If the variables contain HTML tags, these may be interpreted by the browser, resulting in cross-site scripting (XSS).... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/javascript.lang.security.audit.unsafe-dynamic-method |
resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/utils/index.ts:142 | Using non-static data to retrieve and run functions from the object is dangerous. If the data is user-controlled, it may allow executing arbitrary code. [confidence low] | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-blade-form-missing-csrf |
resources/views/books/create.blade.php:30 | Detected a form executing a state-changing HTTP method `POST` to route definition `{{ $bookshelf?->getUrl('/create-book') ?? url('/books') }}` without a Laravel CSRF decorator or explicit CSRF token implementation. If this form modifies... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-blade-form-missing-csrf |
resources/views/books/edit.blade.php:19 | Detected a form executing a state-changing HTTP method `POST` to route definition `{{ $book->getUrl() }}` without a Laravel CSRF decorator or explicit CSRF token implementation. If this form modifies sensitive state this will open your... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-blade-form-missing-csrf |
resources/views/chapters/create.blade.php:18 | Detected a form executing a state-changing HTTP method `POST` to route definition `{{ $book->getUrl('/create-chapter') }}` without a Laravel CSRF decorator or explicit CSRF token implementation. If this form modifies sensitive state... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-blade-form-missing-csrf |
resources/views/chapters/edit.blade.php:20 | Detected a form executing a state-changing HTTP method `POST` to route definition `{{ $chapter->getUrl() }}` without a Laravel CSRF decorator or explicit CSRF token implementation. If this form modifies sensitive state this will open... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-blade-form-missing-csrf |
resources/views/shelves/create.blade.php:22 | Detected a form executing a state-changing HTTP method `POST` to route definition `{{ url(` without a Laravel CSRF decorator or explicit CSRF token implementation. If this form modifies sensitive state this will open your application to... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| medium | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-blade-form-missing-csrf |
resources/views/shelves/edit.blade.php:19 | Detected a form executing a state-changing HTTP method `POST` to route definition `{{ $shelf->getUrl() }}` without a Laravel CSRF decorator or explicit CSRF token implementation. If this form modifies sensitive state this will open your... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:32 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:52 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:53 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:58 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:59 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:68 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:69 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:70 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:79 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command |
dev/docker/db-testing/run.sh:80 | Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... | Lint |
| low | opengrep/javascript.lang.correctness.missing-template-string-indicator |
resources/js/wysiwyg-tinymce/config.js:224 | This looks like a JavaScript template string. Are you missing a '$' in front of '{...}'? | Lint |
| low | osv/GHSA-63hm-g96r-2m2q |
composer.lock | laravel/[email protected] (Packagist) is affected by GHSA-63hm-g96r-2m2q | Dependencies (osv-scanner) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
config/app.php:81 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit db3acabc66); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/generic-api-key |
public/dist/wysiwyg.js:12 | Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit b5638a1c72); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/private-key |
tests/Helpers/OidcJwtHelper.php:92 | Possible private-key secret in the current tree (test/docs/example file) | Secrets (gitleaks) |
| low | gitleaks/private-key |
tests/Unit/OpenIdConnectIdTokenTest.php:77 | Possible private-key secret in history (commit f3d54e4a2d); removed from the current tree but still retrievable | Secrets (gitleaks) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-5 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-5 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 14 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | ok | osv-scanner version: 2.7.1 | 6 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 111 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 4 |
Score history
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 0b6b667e0d84 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 62 | 70 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/BookStackApp/BookStack
- Commit:
0b6b667e0d84ebb3406de6de9fadbf4230c29c0b - Generated: 2026-11-14T15:16:10+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | possible | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 62 | weak | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 70 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development.
-
Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
-
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 2.1%
-
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
-
Stylometry index: 0.01 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 2, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-12 | 2,753 | 0% |
| 2026-01 | 962 | 0% |
| 2026-02 | 3,301 | 0% |
| 2026-03 | 731 | 0% |
| 2026-04 | 1,690 | 0% |
| 2026-05 | 4,892 | 0% |
| 2026-06 | 458 | 0% |
| 2026-07 | 2,109 | 0% |
| 2026-08 | 4,391 | 0% |
| 2026-09 | 2,762 | 0% |
| 2026-10 | 483 | 0% |
| 2026-11 | 559 | 0% |
Evidence
- 5,328 lines of first-party code in ~0.5h (10,656 lines/hour, PR #3258) (da0dc7292cda)
- 3,080 lines of first-party code in ~0.5h (6,160 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (db4093d52335)
- 1,010 lines of first-party code in ~1.2h (828 lines/hour, 1 commit session) (c519f707e826)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Now we will clear the users out of memory so they are no longer available (app/Access/G)
- step-by-step narration comment: // Now we process each of the unique target nodes, attempting (resources/js)
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.26, no CI test run detected; 11% of function code in complex or long functions; 16% duplicated lines. Weakest area: duplication.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 72 |
| Duplication | 39 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 99 |
| Tests and CI | 43 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | 100 |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 50 |
- Functions: 6,308; mean complexity 2.4, 90th percentile 5; 74 complex and 22 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 15.5% of 164,572 compared
- Tests: 55,649 test lines for 217,367 source lines (ratio 0.26); CI test commands: none detected; 50% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Most complex functions:
- insertText in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalSelection.ts: complexity 91, 287 lines
- $handleArrowKey in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/table/LexicalTableSelectionHelpers.ts: complexity 62, 281 lines
- (anonymous) in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalEvents.ts: complexity 56, 191 lines
- updateDOMSelection in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalSelection.ts: complexity 47, 144 lines
- (anonymous) in resources/js/wysiwyg/lexical/core/LexicalMutations.ts: complexity 45, 136 lines
Security
Security posture is weak: 6 known vulnerabilities in 6 dependencies; 74 high-severity SAST findings. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 88 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 90 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | 77 |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | n/a |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 20 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 20 |
-
Known vulnerabilities: 6 in 6 packages (critical 0, high 0, medium 5, low 1)
-
Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates
-
OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 3.2/10 (published 2026-11-09)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Access/Guards/ExternalBaseSessionGuard.php:220 |
| high | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-dangerous-model-construction: Setting $guarded to an empty array allows mass assignment to every property in a Laravel model. This explicitly overrides Eloquent's safe-by-default mass assignment protections. [confidence low] |
app/Activity/Models/Watch.php:26 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/App/helpers.php:23 |
| high | opengrep/php.laravel.security.laravel-cookie-secure-set: Found a configuration file where the secure attribute is not set to 'true'. Setting 'secure' to 'true' prevents the client from transmitting the cookie over unencrypted channels and therefore prevents cookies from being stolen through man in the middle attacks. [confidence low] |
app/Config/session.php:56 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Entities/Tools/PageContent.php:361 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Entities/Tools/SlugGenerator.php:55 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Theming/CustomHtmlHeadContentProvider.php:27 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Theming/CustomHtmlHeadContentProvider.php:43 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Theming/ThemeService.php:139 |
| high | opengrep/php.lang.security.weak-crypto: Detected usage of weak crypto function. Consider using stronger alternatives. [confidence low] |
app/Uploads/UserAvatars.php:108 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/code/index.mjs:64 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a elem.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/code/index.mjs:64 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:66 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.responseContainer.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:66 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:71 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.responseContainer.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/ajax-form.js:71 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:64 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.listPanel.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:64 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:80 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.editContainer.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/attachments.js:80 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:116 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.list.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/auto-suggest.js:116 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/code-editor.js:203 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-innerhtml: User controlled data in a this.historyList.innerHTML is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/code-editor.js:203 |
| high | opengrep/javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities [confidence low] |
resources/js/components/dropdown-search.js:57 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 217,367; test lines: 55,649
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| PHP | 195,354 |
| TypeScript | 70,516 |
| JavaScript | 7,037 |
| Shell | 104 |
| SQL | 5 |