RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager

🖱️ 纯粹的Windows右键菜单管理程序

  • View repository ↗
  • C#
  • ★ 20,437
  • commit 55507155dd8e
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

56/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

82/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.03

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2020-109,163 · 0% AI
  2. 2020-111,397 · 0% AI
  3. 2020-123,020 · 0% AI
  4. 2021-012 · 0% AI
  5. 2021-024,424 · 0% AI
  6. 2021-03962 · 0% AI
  7. 2021-041,994 · 0% AI
  8. 2021-051,402 · 0% AI
  9. 2021-06594 · 0% AI
  10. 2021-07637 · 0% AI
  11. 2021-085,093 · 0% AI
  12. 2021-090 · 0% AI
  13. 2021-100 · 0% AI
  14. 2021-110 · 0% AI
  15. 2022-010 · 0% AI
  16. 2022-030 · 0% AI
  17. 2022-070 · 0% AI
  18. 2023-030 · 0% AI
  19. 2023-040 · 0% AI
  20. 2024-020 · 0% AI
  21. 2024-050 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
234
effective_loc
28,688
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
13,401
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
891.82
measured_loc
15,287
median_loc_per_hour
87.25
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
6,087
pre_ai_era_bursts
2
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
14,596
work_units
54
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
375.10
releases
12
Coding styleok
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
1
count:narrated_steps
0
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
1
files:narrated_steps
0
files:placeholder
0
index
0.03
lines_scanned
16,351
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0.06
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

56 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 13% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

How the score is built

  • Complexity68
  • Duplication80
  • Lint and smells100
  • Tests and CI0
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
12
function_nloc
9,095
functions
602
long_functions
5
many_param_functions
1
mean_ccn
3.29
p90_ccn
7
risky_nloc_share
12.7%
Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items
compared_lines
10,033
duplicated_lines
363
duplicated_share
3.6%
files
113
Lintok
findings
0
scanned_lines
16,351
weighted_findings
0
Tests and CIok
check:ci_present
no
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
no
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
0
cochange_commits
118
cochange_share
0.0%
source_lines
16,351
test_lines
0
test_ratio
0
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
59
Type safetyskipped

Security

82 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets100
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
0
secrets_nonprod
0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
0
scanned_lines
16,351
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
15.5%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok5 items
binary_assets
30
signals
1
suspicious
0

Findings

No line-level findings.

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-50
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityskipped—0no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.10

Score history

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-1455507155dd8eprov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5682

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BluePointLilac/ContextMenuManager/)
Full text report

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 56 weak 90% 100%
Security 82 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 0.03 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 0, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 1). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2020-10 9,163 0%
2020-11 1,397 0%
2020-12 3,020 0%
2021-01 2 0%
2021-02 4,424 0%
2021-03 962 0%
2021-04 1,994 0%
2021-05 1,402 0%
2021-06 594 0%
2021-07 637 0%
2021-08 5,093 0%

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.00, no CI test run detected; 13% of function code in complex or long functions; 4% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 68
Duplication 80
Code smells (Opengrep) 100
Tests and CI 0
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) n/a
  • Functions: 602; mean complexity 3.3, 90th percentile 7; 12 complex and 5 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 3.6% of 10,033 compared
  • Tests: 0 test lines for 16,351 source lines (ratio 0.00); CI test commands: none detected; 0% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 100
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard n/a
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 16,351; test lines: 0
Language Lines
C# 16,345
C 6