RepoTrust

Leaderboard github.com

Blizzard/s2client-api

StarCraft II Client - C++ library supported on Windows, Linux and Mac designed for building scripted bots and research using the SC2API.

  • View repository ↗
  • C++
  • ★ 1,685
  • commit 614acc00abb5
  • scored 2026-11-14
  • scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

0%

none-detected

Confidence
65%
Coverage
100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

59/100

weak

Confidence
90%
Coverage
100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

72/100

adequate

Confidence
85%
Coverage
100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

AI provenance

0% none-detected

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

How the score is built

  • Explicitly attributed share0%
  • Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
  • Estimated AI-generated share0%
  • AI tool configuration files0
  • Work sessions at AI pace0
  • Releases at AI pace0
  • Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.17

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

  1. 2017-0723,652 · 0% AI
  2. 2017-08650 · 0% AI
  3. 2017-091,090 · 0% AI
  4. 2017-10117 · 0% AI
  5. 2017-111,255 · 0% AI
  6. 2017-1223 · 0% AI
  7. 2018-0118 · 0% AI
  8. 2018-032 · 0% AI
  9. 2018-040 · 0% AI
  10. 2018-057 · 0% AI
  11. 2018-068 · 0% AI
  12. 2019-010 · 0% AI
  13. 2019-020 · 0% AI
  14. 2019-033 · 0% AI
  15. 2019-040 · 0% AI
  16. 2019-050 · 0% AI
  17. 2019-060 · 0% AI
  18. 2019-070 · 0% AI
  19. 2019-080 · 0% AI

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok
attributed_commit_share
0.0%
attributed_commits
0
attributed_loc
0
attributed_loc_share
0.0%
commits
135
effective_loc
26,825
tools_detected
0
AI tool configurationok
artifacts
0
tools_configured
0
workflow_agents
0
Commit velocityok
excluded_import_loc
23,652
flagged_loc
0
flagged_loc_share
0.0%
flagged_units
0
max_loc_per_hour
222
measured_loc
3,173
median_loc_per_hour
59.35
pr_timed_units
0
pre_ai_era_burst_loc
0
pre_ai_era_bursts
0
pre_ai_era_measured_loc
3,173
work_units
62
Release velocityok
flagged_releases
0
max_loc_per_day
0
releases
0
Coding styleok3 items
count:assistant_voice
0
count:emoji_in_code
0
count:narrated_steps
3
count:placeholder
0
files:assistant_voice
0
files:emoji_in_code
0
files:narrated_steps
2
files:placeholder
0
index
0.17
lines_scanned
17,803
per_kloc:assistant_voice
0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code
0
per_kloc:narrated_steps
0.17
per_kloc:placeholder
0

Code quality

59 weak

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.29, no CI test run detected; 31% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.

How the score is built

  • Complexity39
  • Duplication83
  • Lint and smells99
  • Tests and CI53
  • Documentation65
  • Type safetynot measured
  • Review process15

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items
complex_functions
26
function_nloc
9,934
functions
704
long_functions
11
many_param_functions
1
mean_ccn
4.78
p90_ccn
8
risky_nloc_share
31.5%
Duplication (jscpd)ok9 items
compared_lines
12,134
duplicated_lines
378
duplicated_share
3.1%
files
73
Lintok
category:correctness
2
findings
2
scanned_lines
17,803
weighted_findings
0.50
Tests and CIok1 item
  • CI config: .travis.yml .travis.yml
check:ci_present
yes
check:ci_runs_lint
no
check:ci_runs_tests
no
check:has_tests
yes
check:test_ratio
no
check:tests_cochange
no
ci_files
1
cochange_commits
77
cochange_share
7.8%
source_lines
17,803
test_lines
5,177
test_ratio
0.29
Documentationok2 items
  • README.md README.md
  • LICENSE LICENSE
check:changelog
no
check:contributing
no
check:license
yes
check:readme
yes
readme_lines
69
Type safetyskipped

Security

72 adequate

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

  • Secrets94
  • Static analysis (SAST)100
  • Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
  • CI workflowsnot measured
  • Security posture0
  • OpenSSF Scorecard33

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardok8 items
aggregate
2.90
check:Binary-Artifacts
yes
check:CII-Best-Practices
no
check:Code-Review
yes
check:Fuzzing
no
check:License
yes
check:Maintained
no
check:SAST
no
check:Security-Policy
no
Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok
secrets_current
0
secrets_history
0
secrets_low_confidence
1
secrets_nonprod
1
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
findings
0
findings_high
0
findings_low
0
findings_medium
0
parse_errors
4
scanned_lines
17,803
weighted_findings
0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)skipped
Security postureok
check:dependency_updates
no
check:lockfiles
yes
check:security_policy
no
check:signed_commits
no
signed_commit_share
6.7%
unpinned_manifests
0
Release downloadsok
binary_assets
0
signals
0
suspicious
0

Findings

4 low

SeverityRuleLocationMessageTool
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command generate_and_deploy_doxygen.sh:47 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low opengrep/bash.lang.correctness.unquoted-variable-expansion-in-command generate_and_deploy_doxygen.sh:54 Variable expansions must be double-quoted so as to prevent being split into multiple pieces according to whitespace or whichever separator is specified by the IFS variable. If you really wish to split the variable's contents, you may... Lint
low gitleaks/generic-api-key dir_3d0dfd3160b31ffa512c49330ac8d646.html:7 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 907f8bd4bf); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)
low gitleaks/generic-api-key docs/html/dir_3d0dfd3160b31ffa512c49330ac8d646.html:8 Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit c93b084b88); removed from the current tree but still retrievable Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

AnalyzerPillarStatusVersionFindingsNote
AI tool configurationAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Explicit AI attributionAI provenanceoksignatures-v10
Release velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Coding styleAI provenanceok—0
Commit velocityAI provenanceokprov-40
Complexity (lizard)Code qualityoklizard 1.25.10
DocumentationCode qualityok—0
Duplication (jscpd)Code qualityokrepotrust-dup-w60
LintCode qualityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4142
Tests and CICode qualityok—0
Type safetyCode qualityskipped—0
CI workflows (zizmor)Securityskipped—0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)Securityskipped—0
Release downloadsSecurityok—0
Security postureSecurityok—0
Package registriesSecurityskipped—0no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)Securityokopengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b4140
OpenSSF ScorecardSecurityokscorecard v5.6.00
Secrets (gitleaks)Securityokgitleaks 8.30.12

Score history

Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.

ScoredCommitScoringAI provenanceQualitySecurity
2026-11-14614acc00abb5prov-5+qual-2+sec-20%5972
2026-11-14614acc00abb5prov-4+qual-2+sec-20%5972

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api/)
[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api/)
[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api/)
Full text report
  • Repository: https://github.com/Blizzard/s2client-api
  • Commit: 614acc00abb5355e4c94a1b0279b46e9d845b7ce
  • Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
  • Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar Score Signal Confidence Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) 0 none-detected 65% 100%
Code quality 59 weak 90% 100%
Security 72 adequate 85% 100%

AI provenance

No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.

  • Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%

  • Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%

  • Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

  • Stylometry index: 0.17 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 3, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month Lines added Attributed to AI
2017-07 23,652 0%
2017-08 650 0%
2017-09 1,090 0%
2017-10 117 0%
2017-11 1,255 0%
2017-12 23 0%
2018-01 18 0%
2018-03 2 0%
2018-05 7 0%
2018-06 8 0%
2019-03 3 0%

Evidence

  • step-by-step narration comment: // First, find a random point inside the playable area of the map. (examples/com)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Step 1: distinguish between a hang and a crash. Lots of time has elapsed, so if there was a crash (src/sc2api/s)
  • step-by-step narration comment: // Step 2: distinguish between a non-responsive app and a failure to deliver a valid request. (src/sc2api/s)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is weak: test-to-source ratio 0.29, no CI test run detected; 31% of function code in complex or long functions; 3% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.

Area Score
Complexity (lizard) 39
Duplication 83
Code smells (Opengrep) 99
Tests and CI 53
Documentation 65
Type safety n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) 15
  • Functions: 704; mean complexity 4.8, 90th percentile 8; 26 complex and 11 long functions
  • Duplicated lines: 3.1% of 12,134 compared
  • Tests: 5,177 test lines for 17,803 source lines (ratio 0.29); CI test commands: none detected; 8% of recent source commits also change tests
  • Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: no high-impact findings. Weakest area: posture.

Area Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) 94
Static analysis (Opengrep) 100
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) n/a
CI workflows (zizmor) n/a
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 33
  • Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
  • OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.9/10 (published 2026-11-09)

Top findings

Severity Finding Location
low gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit 907f8bd4bf); removed from the current tree but still retrievable dir_3d0dfd3160b31ffa512c49330ac8d646.html:7
low gitleaks/generic-api-key: Possible generic-api-key secret in history (commit c93b084b88); removed from the current tree but still retrievable docs/html/dir_3d0dfd3160b31ffa512c49330ac8d646.html:8

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Repository profile

  • Source lines: 17,803; test lines: 5,177
Language Lines
C++ 17,219
C 5,629
Shell 132