Leaderboard github.com

BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller

Remove large amounts of unwanted applications quickly.

View repository ↗
C#
★ 22,478
commit 30da609384c9
scored 2026-11-14
scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2

AI provenance

possible

Confidence: 65%
Coverage: 100%

Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.

Code quality

67/100

adequate

Confidence: 90%
Coverage: 100%

Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.

Security

80/100

adequate

Confidence: 85%
Coverage: 100%

Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.

Dispute or request a re-score Full report JSON

AI provenance

0% possible

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 2 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

How the score is built

Explicitly attributed share0%
Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts10%
Estimated AI-generated share0%
AI tool configuration files0
Work sessions at AI pace3
Releases at AI pace1
Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.04

Attributed AI tools

Tool	Commits	Lines added	First seen	Last seen
OpenAI Codex	2	87	2026-06-08	2026-06-09

Lines added per month all AI-attributed share

2015-0830,653 · 0% AI
2015-0916,115 · 0% AI
2015-101,040 · 0% AI
2015-123,223 · 0% AI
2016-012,382 · 0% AI
2016-023,714 · 0% AI
2016-031,255 · 0% AI
2016-04227 · 0% AI
2016-071,676 · 0% AI
2016-08416 · 0% AI
2016-1099 · 0% AI
2016-121,118 · 0% AI
2017-0151,287 · 0% AI
2017-027,312 · 0% AI
2017-03632 · 0% AI
2017-041,152 · 0% AI
2017-051,027 · 0% AI
2017-061,072 · 0% AI
2017-071,081 · 0% AI
2017-08352 · 0% AI
2017-094,626 · 0% AI
2017-10845 · 0% AI
2017-11710 · 0% AI
2017-125,557 · 0% AI
2018-01504 · 0% AI
2018-02470 · 0% AI
2018-0346 · 0% AI
2018-0472 · 0% AI
2018-06579 · 0% AI
2018-071,748 · 0% AI
2018-082,043 · 0% AI
2018-091,382 · 0% AI
2018-10862 · 0% AI
2018-11292 · 0% AI
2019-01149 · 0% AI
2019-021 · 0% AI
2019-03395 · 0% AI
2019-040 · 0% AI
2019-053,392 · 0% AI
2019-06507 · 0% AI
2019-0855 · 0% AI
2019-09196 · 0% AI
2020-01286 · 0% AI
2021-0522,540 · 0% AI
2021-0769 · 0% AI
2021-082 · 0% AI
2021-1014 · 0% AI
2021-1217 · 0% AI
2022-02748 · 0% AI
2022-05320 · 0% AI
2022-060 · 0% AI
2022-083,960 · 0% AI
2022-09299 · 0% AI
2023-010 · 0% AI
2023-03335 · 0% AI
2023-05128 · 0% AI
2023-060 · 0% AI
2023-0753 · 0% AI
2023-0915 · 0% AI
2023-1041 · 0% AI
2023-120 · 0% AI
2024-014 · 0% AI
2024-020 · 0% AI
2024-030 · 0% AI
2024-05108 · 0% AI
2024-060 · 0% AI
2024-0848 · 0% AI
2024-090 · 0% AI
2024-11953 · 0% AI
2024-120 · 0% AI
2025-02213 · 0% AI
2025-0421 · 0% AI
2025-06664 · 0% AI
2025-07118 · 0% AI
2025-0844 · 0% AI
2026-0316,614 · 0% AI
2026-061,485 · 6% AI
2026-0847 · 0% AI
2026-09339 · 0% AI

Findings in AI-attributed lines vs the rest

From git blame: 87 lines trace to AI-attributed commits, 130,438 to others. Too few lines in one group for a fair comparison. Reported, not scored.

Findings per 1,000 lines	AI-attributed	Other	Ratio
Code quality	0.00	0.00	—
Security	0.00	0.04	—

Evidence by analyzer

Explicit AI attributionok3 items

OpenAI Codex: 2 attributed commits, 87 lines added
OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/fix-self-uninstall-cleanup'
OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/scoop-custom-paths'

attributed_commit_share: 0.1%
attributed_commits: 2
attributed_loc: 87
attributed_loc_share: 0.0%
commits: 1,650
effective_loc: 199,749
tools_detected: 1

AI tool configurationok

artifacts: 0
tools_configured: 0
workflow_agents: 0

Commit velocityok3 items

excluded_import_loc: 96,275
flagged_loc: 19,243
flagged_loc_share: 18.6%
flagged_units: 3
max_loc_per_hour: 24,500
measured_loc: 103,474
median_loc_per_hour: 72.41
pr_timed_units: 70
pre_ai_era_burst_loc: 18,385
pre_ai_era_bursts: 5
pre_ai_era_measured_loc: 76,815
work_units: 553

Release velocityok1 item

v6.0 → v6.1: 13,081 lines in 2.67 days (4,896.0 lines/day)

flagged_releases: 1
max_loc_per_day: 4,896
releases: 72

Coding styleok4 items

count:assistant_voice: 0
count:emoji_in_code: 0
count:narrated_steps: 4
count:placeholder: 0
files:assistant_voice: 0
files:emoji_in_code: 0
files:narrated_steps: 3
files:placeholder: 0
index: 0.04
lines_scanned: 106,558
per_kloc:assistant_voice: 0
per_kloc:emoji_in_code: 0
per_kloc:narrated_steps: 0.04
per_kloc:placeholder: 0

Findings in AI-written linesok

ai_lines: 87
blame_failures: 0
files_blamed: 559
other_lines: 130,438
quality:ai_findings: 0
quality:ai_per_kloc: 0
quality:other_findings: 0
quality:other_per_kloc: 0
security:ai_findings: 0
security:ai_per_kloc: 0
security:other_findings: 5
security:other_per_kloc: 0.04

Code quality

67 adequate

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.01, CI runs tests; 20% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

How the score is built

Complexity55
Duplication59
Lint and smells100
Tests and CI57
Documentation80
Type safetynot measured
Review processnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

Complexity (lizard)ok10 items

complex_functions: 44
function_nloc: 49,997
functions: 3,699
long_functions: 33
many_param_functions: 2
mean_ccn: 2.96
p90_ccn: 6
risky_nloc_share: 19.7%

Duplication (jscpd)ok10 items

compared_lines: 89,903
duplicated_lines: 7,936
duplicated_share: 8.8%
files: 559

Lintok

findings: 0
scanned_lines: 130,525
weighted_findings: 0

Tests and CIok3 items

CI config: .github/workflows/ci.yaml .github/workflows/ci.yaml
CI config: .github/workflows/winget.yml .github/workflows/winget.yml
CI runs tests (dotnet test)

check:ci_present: yes
check:ci_runs_lint: no
check:ci_runs_tests: yes
check:has_tests: yes
check:test_ratio: no
check:tests_cochange: no
ci_files: 2
cochange_commits: 183
cochange_share: 4.4%
source_lines: 130,525
test_lines: 714
test_ratio: 0.01

Documentationok3 items

README.md README.md
Licence.txt Licence.txt
CONTRIBUTING.md CONTRIBUTING.md

check:changelog: no
check:contributing: yes
check:license: yes
check:readme: yes
readme_lines: 46

Type safetyskipped

Security

80 adequate

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings; 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

How the score is built

Secrets97
Static analysis (SAST)99
Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
CI workflows66
Security posture20
OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured

Evidence by analyzer

OpenSSF Scorecardskipped

no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo

Package registriesskipped

no registry dependencies declared

Secrets (gitleaks)ok

secrets_current: 0
secrets_history: 0
secrets_low_confidence: 1
secrets_nonprod: 0

Static analysis (opengrep)ok

findings: 4
findings_high: 2
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 2
parse_errors: 1
scanned_lines: 130,525
weighted_findings: 2.70

Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped

CI workflows (zizmor)ok

findings: 3
findings_high: 2
findings_low: 0
findings_medium: 1
penalty: 25.20
workflows: 2

Security postureok

check:dependency_updates: no
check:lockfiles: yes
check:security_policy: no
check:signed_commits: yes
signed_commit_share: 55.0%
unpinned_manifests: 0

Release downloadsok5 items

binary_assets: 36
signals: 1
suspicious: 0

Findings

4 high3 medium1 low

Severity	Rule	Location	Message	Tool
high	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/winget.yml:17	code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`zizmor/template-injection`	.github/workflows/winget.yml:19	code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	CI workflows (zizmor)
high	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.injections.os-command-injection`	source/KlocTools/Extensions/ProcessExtensions.cs:116	The software constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it...	Static analysis (opengrep)
high	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.injections.os-command-injection`	source/KlocTools/Extensions/ProcessExtensions.cs:126	The software constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it...	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`	.github/workflows/ci.yaml:18	credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	CI workflows (zizmor)
medium	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.filesystem.unsafe-path-combine`	source/UninstallTools/Startup/Normal/StartupEntryManager.cs:177	String argument backupPath is used to read or write data from a file via Path.Combine without direct sanitization via Path.GetFileName. If the path is user-supplied data this can lead to path traversal. [confidence medium]	Static analysis (opengrep)
medium	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.filesystem.unsafe-path-combine`	source/UninstallTools/Startup/Task/TaskEntry.cs:74	String argument backupPath is used to read or write data from a file via Path.Combine without direct sanitization via Path.GetFileName. If the path is user-supplied data this can lead to path traversal. [confidence medium]	Static analysis (opengrep)
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`	source/KlocTools/Extensions/FormsExtensions.cs:234	Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	Secrets (gitleaks)

Tools and coverage

Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.

Analyzer	Pillar	Status	Version	Findings	Note
AI tool configuration	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Explicit AI attribution	AI provenance	ok	`signatures-v1`	0
Release velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-5`	0
Coding style	AI provenance	ok	`—`	0
Commit velocity	AI provenance	ok	`prov-5`	0
Findings in AI-written lines	AI provenance	ok	`git-blame`	0
Complexity (lizard)	Code quality	ok	`lizard 1.25.1`	0
Documentation	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Duplication (jscpd)	Code quality	ok	`repotrust-dup-w6`	0
Lint	Code quality	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	0
Tests and CI	Code quality	ok	`—`	0
Type safety	Code quality	skipped	`—`	0
CI workflows (zizmor)	Security	ok	`zizmor 1.32.0`	3
Dependencies (osv-scanner)	Security	skipped	`—`	0
Release downloads	Security	ok	`—`	0
Security posture	Security	ok	`—`	0
Package registries	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no registry dependencies declared
Static analysis (opengrep)	Security	ok	`opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414`	4
OpenSSF Scorecard	Security	skipped	`—`	0	no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Secrets (gitleaks)	Security	ok	`gitleaks 8.30.1`	1

Score history

Scored	Commit	Scoring	AI provenance	Quality	Security
2026-11-14	`30da609384c9`	`prov-5+qual-2+sec-2`	0%	67	80

Embed a badge

Maintainers can show these in a README. Badges update when the repository is re-scored.

[![RepoTrust ai](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller/ai.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller/)

[![RepoTrust quality](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller/quality.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller/)

[![RepoTrust security](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/badge/github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller/security.svg)](https://repotrust.synapticcyber.com/r/github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller/)

Full text report

Repository: https://github.com/BCUninstaller/Bulk-Crap-Uninstaller
Commit: 30da609384c98ba6e35c6530129541ea4ff3970a
Generated: 2026-11-14T15:13:38+00:00
Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2

Scores

Pillar	Score	Signal	Confidence	Coverage
AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share)	0	possible	65%	100%
Code quality	67	adequate	90%	100%
Security	80	adequate	85%	100%

AI provenance

Weak signals consistent with AI-assisted development. 2 commit(s) carry explicit AI attribution, too few to characterize the codebase.

Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 9.6%
Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%

AI tool	Attributed commits	Lines added
OpenAI Codex	2	87

Current source lines last changed by AI-attributed commits: 87 of 130,525.

Too few lines in one group to compare finding densities.

Stylometry index: 0.04 per 1,000 lines (narrated steps 4, placeholders 0, assistant phrasing 0, emoji 0). Reported as a signal, not scored.

Month	Lines added	Attributed to AI
2024-05	108	0%
2024-08	48	0%
2024-11	953	0%
2025-02	213	0%
2025-04	21	0%
2025-06	664	0%
2025-07	118	0%
2025-08	44	0%
2026-03	16,614	0%
2026-06	1,485	6%
2026-08	47	0%
2026-09	339	0%

Evidence

OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/fix-self-uninstall-cleanup' (51d6ca7728ff)
OpenAI Codex: PR branch 'codex/scoop-custom-paths' (2dcf118aa2d2)
12,250 lines of first-party code in ~0.5h (24,500 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (3c9b0d81b13f)
3,181 lines of first-party code in ~0.8h (4,118 lines/hour, 2 commit session) (541f8af7fd4a)
v6.0 → v6.1: 13,081 lines in 2.67 days (4,896.0 lines/day) (v6.0...v6.1)
3,812 lines of first-party code in ~4.7h (815 lines/hour, 4 commit session) (bd2b9910241f)
step-by-step narration comment: // Finally, draw the images (source/BulkC)
step-by-step narration comment: // Finally, draw all the images in their correct location (source/Objec)
step-by-step narration comment: // Finally, draw the images (source/Objec)
step-by-step narration comment: // Finally, select the row (source/Objec)

AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.

Code quality

Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.01, CI runs tests; 20% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: complexity.

Area	Score
Complexity (lizard)	55
Duplication	59
Code smells (Opengrep)	100
Tests and CI	57
Documentation	80
Type safety	n/a
Process (Scorecard review/maintenance)	n/a

Functions: 3,699; mean complexity 3.0, 90th percentile 6; 44 complex and 33 long functions
Duplicated lines: 8.8% of 89,903 compared
Tests: 714 test lines for 130,525 source lines (ratio 0.01); CI test commands: dotnet test; 4% of recent source commits also change tests
Docs missing or thin: changelog

Most complex functions:

Security

Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity SAST findings; 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.

Area	Score
Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history)	97
Static analysis (Opengrep)	99
Vulnerable dependencies (OSV)	n/a
CI workflows (zizmor)	66
Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles)	20
OpenSSF Scorecard	n/a

Posture checks passed: signed commits, lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates

Top findings

Severity	Finding	Location
high	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.injections.os-command-injection`: The software constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. [confidence low]	source/KlocTools/Extensions/ProcessExtensions.cs:116
high	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.injections.os-command-injection`: The software constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. [confidence low]	source/KlocTools/Extensions/ProcessExtensions.cs:126
high	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	.github/workflows/winget.yml:17
high	`zizmor/template-injection`: code injection via template expansion [confidence high]	.github/workflows/winget.yml:19
medium	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.filesystem.unsafe-path-combine`: String argument backupPath is used to read or write data from a file via Path.Combine without direct sanitization via Path.GetFileName. If the path is user-supplied data this can lead to path traversal. [confidence medium]	source/UninstallTools/Startup/Normal/StartupEntryManager.cs:177
medium	`opengrep/csharp.lang.security.filesystem.unsafe-path-combine`: String argument backupPath is used to read or write data from a file via Path.Combine without direct sanitization via Path.GetFileName. If the path is user-supplied data this can lead to path traversal. [confidence medium]	source/UninstallTools/Startup/Task/TaskEntry.cs:74
medium	`zizmor/artipacked`: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low]	.github/workflows/ci.yaml:18
low	`gitleaks/generic-api-key`: Possible generic-api-key secret in the current tree	source/KlocTools/Extensions/FormsExtensions.cs:234

Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.

Distribution signals

binary-release-asset: release v6.3 ships BCUninstaller_6.3.0_net8.0-windows10.0.18362.0.zip (19437 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v6.3 ships BCUninstaller_6.3.0_portable.7z (45367 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v6.3 ships BCUninstaller_6.3.0_setup.exe (153871 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v6.3 ships Localisation_Pack_6.3.0.zip (2777 downloads)
binary-release-asset: release v6.2 ships BCUninstaller_6.2.0_net8.0-windows10.0.18362.0.zip (20283 downloads)

Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.

Repository profile

Source lines: 130,525; test lines: 714

Language	Lines
C#	131,046
C++	177
C	16