Leaderboard github.com
Ashok-Varma/BottomNavigation
This Library helps users to use Bottom Navigation Bar (A new pattern from google) with ease and allows ton of customizations
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 65%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
82/100
strong
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
76/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2016-031,666 · 0% AI
- 2016-041,289 · 0% AI
- 2016-05721 · 0% AI
- 2016-06209 · 0% AI
- 2016-07590 · 0% AI
- 2016-0923 · 0% AI
- 2017-061,115 · 0% AI
- 2017-07617 · 0% AI
- 2017-1015 · 0% AI
- 2017-120 · 0% AI
- 2018-0521 · 0% AI
- 2018-070 · 0% AI
- 2018-08208 · 0% AI
- 2018-1020 · 0% AI
- 2018-11146 · 0% AI
- 2019-120 · 0% AI
- 2020-02129 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 144
- effective_loc
- 6,769
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 257.75
- measured_loc
- 6,769
- median_loc_per_hour
- 79.50
- pr_timed_units
- 0
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 6,769
- work_units
- 52
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 946.30
- releases
- 14
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 4,184
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
82 strong
Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.01, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication88
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI59
- Documentation65
- Type safetynot measured
- Review processnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 2,021
- functions
- 276
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.71
- p90_ccn
- 3
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok2 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: bottom-navigation-bar/src/main/java/com/ashokvarma/bottomnavigation/BottomNavigationTab.java:147 and bottom-navigation-bar/src/main/java/com/ashokvarma/bottomnavigation/BottomNavigationTab.java:175
- 6+ duplicated lines: sample/src/androidTest/java/com/ashokvarma/sample/Utils.java:87 and sample/src/androidTest/java/com/ashokvarma/sample/Utils.java:102
- compared_lines
- 2,494
- duplicated_lines
- 54
- duplicated_share
- 2.2%
- files
- 18
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 4,184
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok3 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/android.yml
.github/workflows/android.yml - CI config: .travis.yml
.travis.yml - CI runs tests (./gradlew check)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 2
- cochange_commits
- 66
- cochange_share
- 9.1%
- source_lines
- 4,184
- test_lines
- 47
- test_ratio
- 0.01
Documentationok2 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- no
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 63
Type safetyskipped
Security
76 adequate
Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)95
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflows63
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecardnot measured
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardskipped
no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 1
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 1
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 4,184
- weighted_findings
- 0.60
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 4
- findings_high
- 2
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- penalty
- 27.60
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 7.6%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok
- binary_assets
- 0
- signals
- 0
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
2 high3 medium
5 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/android.yml:11 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/android.yml:13 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/android.yml:11 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/android.yml:6 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity |
sample/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:13 | The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access... | Static analysis (opengrep) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 4 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 1 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no published OpenSSF Scorecard result for this repo |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | 4144f98787a2 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 82 | 76 |
| 2026-11-14 | 4144f98787a2 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 82 | 76 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/Ashok-Varma/BottomNavigation
- Commit:
4144f98787a2bca55ccdd3c19372e00a75e75b68 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:52:00+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 65% | 100% |
| Code quality | 82 | strong | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 76 | adequate | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-05 | 721 | 0% |
| 2016-06 | 209 | 0% |
| 2016-07 | 590 | 0% |
| 2016-09 | 23 | 0% |
| 2017-06 | 1,115 | 0% |
| 2017-07 | 617 | 0% |
| 2017-10 | 15 | 0% |
| 2018-05 | 21 | 0% |
| 2018-08 | 208 | 0% |
| 2018-10 | 20 | 0% |
| 2018-11 | 146 | 0% |
| 2020-02 | 129 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is strong: test-to-source ratio 0.01, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 2% duplicated lines. Weakest area: testing.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 88 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 59 |
| Documentation | 65 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | n/a |
- Functions: 276; mean complexity 1.7, 90th percentile 3; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 2.2% of 2,494 compared
- Tests: 47 test lines for 4,184 source lines (ratio 0.01); CI test commands: ./gradlew check; 9% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: contributing, changelog
Security
Security posture is adequate: 2 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 95 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 63 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | n/a |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/android.yml:11 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/android.yml:13 |
| medium | opengrep/java.android.security.exported_activity: The application exports an activity. Any application on the device can launch the exported activity which may compromise the integrity of your application or its data. Ensure that any exported activities do not have privileged access to your application's control plane. [confidence medium] |
sample/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml:13 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/android.yml:11 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/android.yml:6 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 4,184; test lines: 47
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Java | 3,910 |
| Kotlin | 321 |