Leaderboard github.com
AkshayChordiya/News
A sample News 🗞 app built using Modern Android Development [Architecture Components, Coroutines, Retrofit, Room, Kotlin, Dagger]
AI provenance
0%
none-detected
- Confidence
- 61%
- Coverage
- 100%
Estimated share of AI-generated code. Explicit attribution is a lower bound.
Code quality
74/100
adequate
- Confidence
- 90%
- Coverage
- 100%
Complexity, duplication, lint density, tests, CI, docs and review process.
Security
66/100
weak
- Confidence
- 85%
- Coverage
- 100%
Secrets, static analysis, vulnerable dependencies, CI and supply-chain posture.
AI provenance
0% none-detected
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
How the score is built
- Explicitly attributed share0%
- Unattributed share in AI-pace bursts0%
- Estimated AI-generated share0%
- AI tool configuration files0
- Work sessions at AI pace0
- Releases at AI pace0
- Coding-style index (1.0+ means possible)0.00
Lines added per month all AI-attributed share
- 2017-05339 · 0% AI
- 2017-06771 · 0% AI
- 2017-0719 · 0% AI
- 2017-11483 · 0% AI
- 2018-03282 · 0% AI
- 2018-04222 · 0% AI
- 2019-036 · 0% AI
- 2019-04637 · 0% AI
- 2019-10133 · 0% AI
- 2019-11528 · 0% AI
- 2020-02177 · 0% AI
- 2020-03124 · 0% AI
- 2020-050 · 0% AI
- 2020-07243 · 0% AI
- 2020-09218 · 0% AI
- 2020-1017 · 0% AI
Evidence by analyzer
Explicit AI attributionok
- attributed_commit_share
- 0.0%
- attributed_commits
- 0
- attributed_loc
- 0
- attributed_loc_share
- 0.0%
- commits
- 85
- effective_loc
- 4,199
- tools_detected
- 0
AI tool configurationok
- artifacts
- 0
- tools_configured
- 0
- workflow_agents
- 0
Commit velocityok
- excluded_import_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc
- 0
- flagged_loc_share
- 0.0%
- flagged_units
- 0
- max_loc_per_hour
- 192.25
- measured_loc
- 4,199
- median_loc_per_hour
- 65.48
- pr_timed_units
- 3
- pre_ai_era_burst_loc
- 0
- pre_ai_era_bursts
- 0
- pre_ai_era_measured_loc
- 4,199
- work_units
- 32
Release velocityok
- flagged_releases
- 0
- max_loc_per_day
- 9.60
- releases
- 5
Coding styleok
- count:assistant_voice
- 0
- count:emoji_in_code
- 0
- count:narrated_steps
- 0
- count:placeholder
- 0
- files:assistant_voice
- 0
- files:emoji_in_code
- 0
- files:narrated_steps
- 0
- files:placeholder
- 0
- index
- 0
- lines_scanned
- 1,079
- per_kloc:assistant_voice
- 0
- per_kloc:emoji_in_code
- 0
- per_kloc:narrated_steps
- 0
- per_kloc:placeholder
- 0
Code quality
74 adequate
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.17, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
How the score is built
- Complexity100
- Duplication58
- Lint and smells100
- Tests and CI72
- Documentation80
- Type safetynot measured
- Review process5
Evidence by analyzer
Complexity (lizard)ok
- complex_functions
- 0
- function_nloc
- 227
- functions
- 43
- long_functions
- 0
- many_param_functions
- 0
- mean_ccn
- 1.16
- p90_ccn
- 2
- risky_nloc_share
- 0.0%
Duplication (jscpd)ok3 items
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/akshay/newsapp/news/NewsMapper.kt:10 and app/src/main/java/com/akshay/newsapp/news/NewsMapper.kt:23
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/akshay/newsapp/news/storage/NewsDatabaseMigrations.kt:37 and app/src/main/java/com/akshay/newsapp/news/storage/NewsDatabaseMigrations.kt:57
- 6+ duplicated lines: app/src/main/java/com/akshay/newsapp/news/storage/NewsDatabaseMigrations.kt:43 and app/src/main/java/com/akshay/newsapp/news/storage/entity/NewsArticleDb.kt:79
- compared_lines
- 501
- duplicated_lines
- 45
- duplicated_share
- 9.0%
- files
- 28
Lintok
- findings
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,079
- weighted_findings
- 0
Tests and CIok2 items
- CI config: .github/workflows/build-workflow.yml
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml - CI runs tests (gradlew test)
- check:ci_present
- yes
- check:ci_runs_lint
- no
- check:ci_runs_tests
- yes
- check:has_tests
- yes
- check:test_ratio
- no
- check:tests_cochange
- no
- ci_files
- 1
- cochange_commits
- 48
- cochange_share
- 20.8%
- source_lines
- 1,079
- test_lines
- 187
- test_ratio
- 0.17
Documentationok3 items
- README.md
README.md - LICENSE
LICENSE - CONTRIBUTING.md
CONTRIBUTING.md
- check:changelog
- no
- check:contributing
- yes
- check:license
- yes
- check:readme
- yes
- readme_lines
- 82
Type safetyskipped
Security
66 weak
Security posture is weak: 5 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
How the score is built
- Secrets100
- Static analysis (SAST)100
- Vulnerable dependenciesnot measured
- CI workflows35
- Security posture0
- OpenSSF Scorecard27
Evidence by analyzer
OpenSSF Scorecardok12 items
- Scorecard Maintained: 0/10 (0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard Binary-Artifacts: 9/10 (binaries present in source code)
- Scorecard Dangerous-Workflow: 10/10 (no dangerous workflow patterns detected)
- Scorecard Code-Review: 1/10 (Found 3/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1)
- Scorecard Token-Permissions: 0/10 (detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions)
- Scorecard Pinned-Dependencies: 0/10 (dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0)
- Scorecard CII-Best-Practices: 0/10 (no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected)
- Scorecard Security-Policy: 0/10 (security policy file not detected)
- Scorecard License: 10/10 (license file detected)
- Scorecard Fuzzing: 0/10 (project is not fuzzed)
- Scorecard Signed-Releases: 0/10 (Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.)
- Scorecard SAST: 0/10 (SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0)
- aggregate
- 2.80
- check:Binary-Artifacts
- yes
- check:CII-Best-Practices
- no
- check:Code-Review
- yes
- check:Dangerous-Workflow
- yes
- check:Fuzzing
- no
- check:License
- yes
- check:Maintained
- no
- check:Pinned-Dependencies
- no
- check:SAST
- no
- check:Security-Policy
- no
- check:Signed-Releases
- no
- check:Token-Permissions
- no
Package registriesskipped
no registry dependencies declared
Secrets (gitleaks)ok
- secrets_current
- 0
- secrets_history
- 0
- secrets_low_confidence
- 0
- secrets_nonprod
- 0
Static analysis (opengrep)ok
- findings
- 0
- findings_high
- 0
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 0
- parse_errors
- 0
- scanned_lines
- 1,079
- weighted_findings
- 0
Dependencies (osv-scanner)skipped
CI workflows (zizmor)ok
- findings
- 7
- findings_high
- 5
- findings_low
- 0
- findings_medium
- 2
- penalty
- 63.60
- workflows
- 1
Security postureok
- check:dependency_updates
- no
- check:lockfiles
- yes
- check:security_policy
- no
- check:signed_commits
- no
- signed_commit_share
- 4.7%
- unpinned_manifests
- 0
Release downloadsok3 items
- release v3.0.0 ships NewsApp-v3.0.apk (244 downloads)
- release v2.8.5 ships NewsApp.v2.8.5.apk (70 downloads)
- release v2.8.0 ships NewsApp.v2.8.0.apk (48 downloads)
- binary_assets
- 3
- signals
- 1
- suspicious
- 0
Findings
5 high2 medium
7 findings
| Severity | Rule | Location | Message | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:18 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:22 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:28 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:33 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:54 | unpinned action reference [confidence high] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:12 | overly broad permissions [confidence medium] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:17 | credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] | CI workflows (zizmor) |
Tools and coverage
Every analyzer that ran on this commit. A failed or skipped tool is a coverage gap: its share of the score is left out and the coverage figure drops.
| Analyzer | Pillar | Status | Version | Findings | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI tool configuration | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Explicit AI attribution | AI provenance | ok | signatures-v1 | 0 | |
| Release velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Coding style | AI provenance | ok | — | 0 | |
| Commit velocity | AI provenance | ok | prov-4 | 0 | |
| Complexity (lizard) | Code quality | ok | lizard 1.25.1 | 0 | |
| Documentation | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Duplication (jscpd) | Code quality | ok | repotrust-dup-w6 | 0 | |
| Lint | Code quality | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| Tests and CI | Code quality | ok | — | 0 | |
| Type safety | Code quality | skipped | — | 0 | |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | Security | ok | zizmor 1.32.0 | 7 | |
| Dependencies (osv-scanner) | Security | skipped | — | 0 | |
| Release downloads | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Security posture | Security | ok | — | 0 | |
| Package registries | Security | skipped | — | 0 | no registry dependencies declared |
| Static analysis (opengrep) | Security | ok | opengrep 1.33.1; rules f1d2b562b414 | 0 | |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Security | ok | scorecard v5.6.0 | 0 | |
| Secrets (gitleaks) | Security | ok | gitleaks 8.30.1 | 0 |
Score history
Scores from different scoring versions aren't directly comparable.
| Scored | Commit | Scoring | AI provenance | Quality | Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-14 | a538b049b863 | prov-5+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 74 | 66 |
| 2026-11-14 | a538b049b863 | prov-4+qual-2+sec-2 | 0% | 74 | 66 |
Full text report
- Repository: https://github.com/AkshayChordiya/News
- Commit:
a538b049b8635220185e454e68e41bd4cfd72138 - Generated: 2026-11-14T14:51:59+00:00
- Scorer 0.1.0, scoring prov-5+qual-2+sec-2, report schema v2
Scores
| Pillar | Score | Signal | Confidence | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI provenance (estimated AI-generated share) | 0 | none-detected | 61% | 100% |
| Code quality | 74 | adequate | 90% | 100% |
| Security | 66 | weak | 85% | 100% |
AI provenance
No AI attribution or AI-consistent velocity signals detected.
- Explicitly attributed share (lower bound): 0.0%
- Unattributed share in AI-consistent velocity bursts: 0.0%
- Estimated AI-generated share: 0.0%
| Month | Lines added | Attributed to AI |
|---|---|---|
| 2017-11 | 483 | 0% |
| 2018-03 | 282 | 0% |
| 2018-04 | 222 | 0% |
| 2019-03 | 6 | 0% |
| 2019-04 | 637 | 0% |
| 2019-10 | 133 | 0% |
| 2019-11 | 528 | 0% |
| 2020-02 | 177 | 0% |
| 2020-03 | 124 | 0% |
| 2020-07 | 243 | 0% |
| 2020-09 | 218 | 0% |
| 2020-10 | 17 | 0% |
AI provenance describes how code was produced; it is not a quality judgment. Unless attribution is explicit, these are signals consistent with AI generation, not proof. Squash/rebase workflows, imported code, and rewritten history reduce accuracy.
Code quality
Code quality is adequate: test-to-source ratio 0.17, CI runs tests; 0% of function code in complex or long functions; 9% duplicated lines. Weakest area: process.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Complexity (lizard) | 100 |
| Duplication | 58 |
| Code smells (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Tests and CI | 72 |
| Documentation | 80 |
| Type safety | n/a |
| Process (Scorecard review/maintenance) | 5 |
- Functions: 43; mean complexity 1.2, 90th percentile 2; 0 complex and 0 long functions
- Duplicated lines: 9.0% of 501 compared
- Tests: 187 test lines for 1,079 source lines (ratio 0.17); CI test commands: gradlew test; 21% of recent source commits also change tests
- Docs missing or thin: changelog
Security
Security posture is weak: 5 high-severity workflow issues. Weakest area: posture.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Secrets (gitleaks, tree + history) | 100 |
| Static analysis (Opengrep) | 100 |
| Vulnerable dependencies (OSV) | n/a |
| CI workflows (zizmor) | 35 |
| Posture (policy, updates, signing, lockfiles) | 0 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 27 |
- Posture checks passed: lockfiles; missing: security policy, dependency updates, signed commits
- OpenSSF Scorecard aggregate: 2.8/10 (published 2026-11-09)
Top findings
| Severity | Finding | Location |
|---|---|---|
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:18 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:22 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:28 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:33 |
| high | zizmor/unpinned-uses: unpinned action reference [confidence high] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:54 |
| medium | zizmor/artipacked: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts [confidence low] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:17 |
| medium | zizmor/excessive-permissions: overly broad permissions [confidence medium] |
.github/workflows/build-workflow.yml:12 |
Static signals only: the scorer never runs the project's code. Secret findings are pattern matches that were not verified, and secret values are never stored.
Distribution signals
- binary-release-asset: release v3.0.0 ships NewsApp-v3.0.apk (244 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v2.8.5 ships NewsApp.v2.8.5.apk (70 downloads)
- binary-release-asset: release v2.8.0 ships NewsApp.v2.8.0.apk (48 downloads)
Signals consistent with a repository that exists to distribute a download. They are heuristics, not a verdict; release files were not downloaded or inspected.
Repository profile
- Source lines: 1,079; test lines: 187
| Language | Lines |
|---|---|
| Kotlin | 1,266 |